Literature DB >> 33158928

Cost-effectiveness of antithrombotic agents for atrial fibrillation in older adults at risk for falls: a mathematical modelling study.

Eric K C Wong1, Christina Belza2, David M J Naimark2, Sharon E Straus2, Harindra C Wijeysundera2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic drugs decrease stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, but they increase bleeding risk, particularly in older adults at high risk for falls. We aimed to determine the most cost-effective antithrombotic therapy in older adults with atrial fibrillation who are at high risk for falls.
METHODS: We conducted a mathematical modelling study from July 2019 to March 2020 based on the Ontario, Canada, health care system. We derived the base-case age, sex and fall risk distribution from a published cohort of older adults at risk for falls, and the bleeding and stroke risk parameters from an atrial fibrillation trial population. Using a probabilistic microsimulation Markov decision model, we calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for each of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. Cost data were adjusted for inflation to 2018 values. The analysis used the Ontario public payer perspective with a lifetime horizon.
RESULTS: In our model, the most cost-effective antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation in older patients at risk for falls was apixaban, with an ICER of $8517 per QALY gained (5.86 QALYs at $92 056) over ASA. It was a dominant strategy over warfarin and the other antithrombotic agents. There was moderate uncertainty in cost-effectiveness ranking, with apixaban as the preferred choice in 66% of model iterations (given willingness to pay of $50 000 per QALY gained); edoxaban, 30 mg, was preferred in 31% of iterations. Sensitivity analysis across ranges of age, bleeding risk and fall risk still favoured apixaban over the other medications.
INTERPRETATION: From a public payer perspective, apixaban is the most cost-effective antithrombotic agent in older adults at high risk for falls. Health care funders should implement strategies to encourage use of the most cost-effective medication in this population. Copyright 2020, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33158928      PMCID: PMC7661050          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  39 in total

1.  The lifetime risk of stroke: estimates from the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Sudha Seshadri; Alexa Beiser; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Carlos S Kase; Rhoda Au; William B Kannel; Philip A Wolf
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Incidence of intracranial hemorrhage and outcomes after ground-level falls in geriatric trauma patients taking preinjury anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents.

Authors:  Subhash Reddy; Rohit Sharma; Jonathan Grotts; Lisa Ferrigno; Stephen Kaminski
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J C van Swieten; P J Koudstaal; M C Visser; H J Schouten; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.

Authors:  M E Tinetti; M Speechley; S F Ginter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical Outcomes and History of Fall in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Oral Anticoagulation: Insights From the ARISTOTLE Trial.

Authors:  Meena P Rao; Dragos Vinereanu; Daniel M Wojdyla; John H Alexander; Dan Atar; Elaine M Hylek; Michael Hanna; Lars Wallentin; Renato D Lopes; Bernard J Gersh; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Functional outcome 3 months after stroke predicts long-term survival.

Authors:  Marie Eriksson; Bo Norrving; Andreas Terént; Birgitta Stegmayr
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.762

7.  A comparison of risk stratification schemes for stroke in 79,884 atrial fibrillation patients in general practice.

Authors:  T P Van Staa; E Setakis; G L Di Tanna; D A Lane; G Y H Lip
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  Economic evaluation of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion, dabigatran, and warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Sheldon M Singh; Andrew Micieli; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Non-major bleeding with apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Cecilia Bahit; Renato D Lopes; Daniel M Wojdyla; Claes Held; Michael Hanna; Dragos Vinereanu; Elaine M Hylek; Freek Verheugt; Shinya Goto; John H Alexander; Lars Wallentin; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Apixaban Concentrations with Lower than Recommended Dosing in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Smrithi Sukumar; Markus Gulilat; Bradley Linton; Steven E Gryn; George K Dresser; Jeffrey E Alfonsi; Ute I Schwarz; Richard B Kim; Janice B Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 7.538

View more
  2 in total

1.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at Risk of Falling: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinxing Gao; Donghua Huang; Yuting Hu; Yuanyuan Chen; Haidong Zhang; Fuwei Liu; Jun Luo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-09

2.  Financial Incentives for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Ontario, Canada: A Cost-Utility Analysis.

Authors:  John K Peel; Rafael Neves Miranda; David Naimark; Graham Woodward; Mamas A Mamas; Mina Madan; Harindra C Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 6.106

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.