Literature DB >> 33158467

Immunosuppression in liver transplant.

Tommaso Di Maira1, Ester Coelho Little2, Marina Berenguer3.   

Abstract

The increasing potency of immunosuppression (IS) agents resulted in significantly decreased rates of steroid resistant rejection and rejection related graft loss in liver transplantation (LT). Currently, more than two thirds of late mortality after LT is unrelated to graft function. However, the increased benefit of more potent IS drugs, coupled with the prolonged survival of transplant recipients led to longer patients exposure to these drugs and their unwanted adverse effects, creating a double-edged sword. In this article the authors describe the mechanism of action and the adverse effects of the most commonly used immunosuppressed drugs, and the most commonly used IS regimens for both induction and maintenance regimens. The balance between the ideal IS regimen to prevent rejection and the need to minimize the dose of IS drugs in order to prevent the adverse effects related to its use requires the knowledge of the science and the experience with the art of medicine. The different protocols aimed at protecting renal function and preventing the development of de novo cancer and metabolic syndrome are discussed here. The main causes of mortality late after liver transplant are associated with prolonged use of IS medications, and clear evidence exists about over-immunosuppression of recipients of liver transplant. The current status of strategies of IS minimization and withdrawal are reviewed in this article, with evaluation of its benefits and pitfalls.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Azathioprine; Calcineurin inhibitors; Cyclosporine; Everolimus; Immunosuppression; Immunosuppression induction; Immunosuppression maintenance; Immunosuppression minimization; Immunosuppression withdrawal; Liver transplantation; Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors; Monoclonal antibodies; Mycophenolate mofetil; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Tolerance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33158467     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current aspects of renal dysfunction after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mariana P Pacheco; Luiz Augusto Carneiro-D'Albuquerque; Daniel F Mazo
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  Chronic rejection after liver transplantation: Opening the Pandora's box.

Authors:  Roberta Angelico; Bruno Sensi; Tommaso M Manzia; Giuseppe Tisone; Giuseppe Grassi; Alessandro Signorello; Martina Milana; Ilaria Lenci; Leonardo Baiocchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Typical and atypical properties of peripheral nerve allografts enable novel strategies to repair segmental-loss injuries.

Authors:  George D Bittner; Jared S Bushman; Cameron L Ghergherehchi; Kelly C S Roballo; Jaimie T Shores; Tyler A Smith
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.322

4.  Characterization and Proteomic Analyses of Proinflammatory Cytokines in a Mouse Model of Liver Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Shi-Peng Li; Xin-Qiang Li; Xiao-Jie Chen; Jin-Ming Zhang; Guang-Peng Zhou; Liu-Xin Zhou; Hai-Ming Zhang; Li-Ying Sun; Zhi-Jun Zhu
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 7.310

5.  Nano-Chemotherapy synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitor- A better option?

Authors:  Xinye Qian; Wang Hu; Jun Yan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 8.786

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.