| Literature DB >> 33158133 |
Zhigang Fang1,2, Zhaoyang Hu2, Xinqiang Yin2, Gang Song2, Qingsheng Cai2.
Abstract
Subcellular fractions and the chemical forms of cadmium (Cd) reflect its level of toxicity to plants; however, these effects of exogenous glutathione (GSH) are poorly understood. We exposed two Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) cultivars (IdyII and Harukaze) to 50 µM Cd or 200 µM GSH to investigate the effect of GSH on the Cd uptake, subcellular compartments, and chemical forms. Cd significantly inhibited the plant growth, while GSH supplementation decreased this inhibition. The application of GSH significantly improved the Cd concentration in the roots but reduced that in the shoots and decreased the Cd translocation from root to shoot. The Cd concentration of the root in the cell wall was increased while the concentration in the soluble fraction was decreased when supplied with GSH. The inorganic form (80% ethanol for Cd extraction) in the roots was significantly reduced when treated with GSH. The Cd form extracted by 2% acetic acid (HAC) with low toxicity and immobility were greatly increased. In leaves, the application GSH decreased in any form of Cd form extracted. In conclusion, exogenous GSH decreased the translocation of Cd and alleviated Italian ryegrass Cd toxicity by accumulating more Cd in the root cell wall and immobilizing more Cd in lower toxicity fractions.Entities:
Keywords: GSH; Italian ryegrass; absorption; cadmium; chemical form; subcellular distribution
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33158133 PMCID: PMC7663564 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17218143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
The effect of glutathione (GSH) on the plant biomass of Italian ryegrass seedlings under cadmium (Cd) stress.
| Cultivar | Treatment | Root DW/mg | Root Tl | Shoot DW/mg | Shoot TI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IdyII | CK | 22.51 ± 2.77 a | 1.00 | 123.98 ± 10.4 a | 1.00 |
| Cd | 13.30 ± 1.57 c | 0.59 | 80.48 ± 8.41 c | 0.65 | |
| Cd + GSH | 20.54 ± 1.71 ab | 0.91 | 104.42 ± 5.65 ab | 0.84 | |
| GSH | 24.79 ± 1.87 a | 1.10 | 122.38 ± 5.55 a | 0.99 | |
| Harukaze | CK | 15.29 ± 0.99 bc | 1.00 | 84.00 ± 5.05 bc | 1.00 |
| Cd | 5.46 ± 0.58 d | 0.36 | 35.20 ± 3.62 e | 0.42 | |
| Cd + GSH | 13.02 ± 2.43 c | 0.85 | 59.41 ± 6.82 d | 0.71 | |
| GSH | 14.72 ± 1.47 c | 0.96 | 94.83 ± 3.90 bc | 1.12 |
DW, dry weight; CK, control; Cd, 50 µM Cd; Cd + GSH, 50 µM Cd with 200 µM GSH; TI indicates tolerance index; Values are means ± standard error (SE) (n = 3). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among the treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 1The effect of GSH on the Cd concentration in plant roots (a), shoots (b), and translocation factor (TF) (c) exposed to Cd stress. Values are means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters in the column indicate significant differences among the treatments at p < 0.05. Cd, 50 µM Cd; Cd + GSH, and 50 µM Cd with 200 µM GSH. Cd in CK and GSH was below the detection.
Figure 2The effect of GSH on the subcellular distribution of Cd in Italian ryegrass roots (a) and leaves (b) exposed to Cd stress. The capital letters A and B on the horizontal axis represent IdyII and Harukaze, respectively. Cd, 50 µM Cd; Cd + GSH, 50 µM Cd with 200 µM GSH; Values are means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters in the same subcellular fraction indicate significant differences among the treatments at p < 0.05.
The effect of GSH on the Cd subcellular distribution in the roots and leaves of two Italian ryegrass cultivars exposed to Cd.
| Cultivar | Treatment | Root | Leaf | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell Wall% | Organelle% | Soluble Fraction% | Cell Wall% | Organelle% | Soluble Fraction% | ||
| IdyII | Cd | 26.28 ± 1.01 c | 4.06 ± 0.93 c | 69.66 ± 1.87 a | 29.50 ± 1.53 a | 8.53 ± 1.31 a | 61.97 ± 2.81 b |
| Cd + GSH | 66.98 ± 2.50 a | 6.94 ± 0.79 bc | 26.08 ± 1.95 c | 20.58 ± 2.53 b | 9.67 ± 1.28 a | 69.75 ± 3.22 a | |
| Harukaze | Cd | 13.56 ± 0.22 d | 12.11 ± 1.38 a | 74.33 ± 1.58 a | 25.14 ± 0.21 ab | 7.92 ± 0.47 a | 66.95 ± 0.26 ab |
| Cd + GSH | 40.21 ± 5.49 b | 10.27 ± 2.04 ab | 49.52 ± 5.06 b | 24.46 ± 0.87 ab | 9.38 ± 0.87 a | 66.16 ± 0.67 ab | |
Cd, 50 µM Cd; Cd + GSH, 50 µM Cd with 200 µM GSH; Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among the treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 3The effect of GSH on the Cd concentration of chemical forms in Italian ryegrass roots exposed to Cd stress. Values are means ± SE (n = 3). Cd, 50 µM Cd; Cd + GSH, 50 µM Cd with 200 µM GSH; Cd in different chemical forms was extracted successively by the following extraction solutions: (a) 80% ethanol (F ethanol); (b) d-H2O (F H2O); (c) 1 M NaCl (F NaCl); (d) 2% acetic acid (HAC) (F NaCl); (e) 0.6 M HCl (F HCl); (f) residue (F R). Different letters in the same chemical forms indicate significant differences among the treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 4The effect of GSH on the Cd concentration of chemical forms in Italian ryegrass leaves exposed to Cd stress. The values are means ± SE (n = 3). Cd, 50 µM Cd; Cd + GSH, 50 µM Cd with 200 µM GSH; Cd in different chemical forms was extracted successively by the following extraction solutions: (a) 80% ethanol (F ethanol); (b) d-H2O (F H2O); (c) 1 M NaCl (F NaCl); (d) 2% HAC (F NaCl). Different letters in the same chemical forms indicate significant differences among the treatments at p < 0.05.
The effect of GSH on the distribution of each chemical form of Cd in Italian ryegrass exposed to Cd stress.
| Tissue | Cultivar | Treatment | F Ethanol% | F d-H2O% | F NaCl% | F HAC% | F HCl% | F Residue% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root | IdyII | Cd50 | 59.25 ± 5.42 a | 14.45 ± 3.03 b | 23.31 ± 1.91 a | 2.79 ± 0.49 c | 0.20 ± 0.04 c | 0 c |
| Cd50 + GSH | 30.96 ± 1.00 b | 22.07 ± 0.95 a | 14.51 ± 1.12 b | 25.36 ± 1.01 b | 7.05 ± 0.45 a | 0.2 ± 0.06 b | ||
| Harukaze | Cd50 | 69.72 ± 2.52 a | 11.59 ± 1.1 b | 16.18 ± 3.92 ab | 1.15 ± 0.26 c | 1.36 ± 0.47 b | 0 c | |
| Cd50 + GSH | 29.69 ± 3.56 b | 17.11 ± 2.25 ab | 15.49 ± 0.44 b | 30.92 ± 1.5 a | 6.65 ± 0.27 a | 0.77 ± 0.13 a | ||
| Leaf | IdyII | Cd50 | 40.84 ± 6.29 a | 25.69 ± 2.32 a | 26.13 ± 3.14 a | 7.34 ± 0.88 a | - | - |
| Cd50 + GSH | 58.25 ± 9.64 a | 9.86 ± 2.67 c | 22.36 ± 3.14 a | 9.67 ± 2.03 a | - | - | ||
| Harukaze | Cd50 | 59.46 ± 7.17 a | 18.36 ± 2.06 b | 20.51 ± 5.97 a | 1.67 ± 0.49 b | - | - | |
| Cd50 + GSH | 57.93 ± 0.58 a | 11.71 ± 1.22 bc | 27.05 ± 1.07 a | 3.31 ± 0.33 b | - | - |
Cd, 50 µM Cd; Cd + GSH, 50 µM Cd with 200 µM GSH; different letters in the same column indicate significant differences among the treatments at p < 0.05.
The correlation coefficients among the root TI, the proportion of Cd in root cell wall and chemical form.
| Index | Tl | RCW% | F Ethanol% | F H2O% | F NaCl% | F HAC% | F HCl% | F Residue% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tl | 1 | |||||||
| RCW% | 0.860 ** | 1 | ||||||
| F ethanol% | –0.774 ** | –0.812 ** | 1 | |||||
| F H2O% | 0.545 | 0.776 ** | –0.805 ** | 1 | ||||
| F NaCl% | –0.205 | –0.316 | 0.254 | –0.255 | 1 | |||
| F HAC% | 0.767 ** | 0.753 ** | –0.954 ** | 0.663 * | –0.460 | 1 | ||
| F HCl% | 0.698 * | 0.791 ** | –0.891 ** | 0.700 * | –0.637 * | 0.954 ** | 1 | |
| F Residue% | 0.747 ** | 0.550 | –0.823 ** | 0.439 | –0.404 | 0.913 ** | 0.822 ** | 1 |
TI, RCW, F ethanol%, F H2O%, F NaCl%, F HAC%, F HCl%, and F Residue% indicate the tolerance index, the proportion of Cd in root cell wall, the proportion of F ethanol, the proportion of F H2O, the proportion of F NaCl, the proportion of F HAC, the proportion of F HCl, and the proportion of F Residue, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.