| Literature DB >> 33157912 |
Godwin C Abiogu1, Moses Onyemaechi Ede1, Fidelis E Amaeze1, Ogechi Nnamani1, John J Agah2, Clifford E Ogheneakoke3, Felix O Ugwuozor1, Ngozi Obiyo1, Chukwuemeka Ezurike1, Nneka Nwosu1, Obageli C Onyeanusi4, Maduaka L Nweke5, Chijioke V Amoke1, Timothy E Asogwa1, Emmanuel I Obeagu6, Kelechi R Ede7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visually impaired students have been reported to struggle with value system and rash decision making process. This study examined the impact of rational emotive behavioral therapy (REBT) in reducing negative personal value system of visually impaired people.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33157912 PMCID: PMC7647572 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022333
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Demographic characteristics of the participants.
| Characteristics | V-REBP group n (%) | No contact control group n (%) | Statistic χ2 | Sig |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 17 (60.7) | 15 (53.6) | 0.292 | .589 |
| Female | 11 (39.3) | 13 (46.4) | ||
| Age | ||||
| 16 yr & below | 6 (21.4) | 6 (21.49) | 0.101 | .951 |
| 17–19 yr | 14 (50.0) | 15 (53.6) | ||
| 20 yr and above | 8 (28.6) | 7 (25.0) | ||
| Religious affiliation | ||||
| Christianity | 17 (60.7) | 17 (60.7) | 0.786 | .675 |
| Islam | 6 (21.4) | 8 (28.6) | ||
| Others | 5 (17.9) | 3 (10.7) | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Igbo | 11 (39.3) | 11 (39.3) | 1.636 | .651 |
| Hausa | 6 (21.4) | 6 (21.4) | ||
| Yoruba | 7 (25.0) | 4 (14.3) | ||
| Others | 4 (14.3) | 7 (25.0) | ||
| State | ||||
| Enugu | 9 (32.1) | 5 (17.9) | 2.227 | .527 |
| Imo | 5 (17.9) | 7 (25.0) | ||
| Anambra | 5 (17.9) | 8 (28.6) | ||
| Others | 9 (32.1) | 8 (28.6) | ||
| Position in the family | ||||
| First | 8 (28.6) | 4 (14.3) | 2.204 | .531 |
| Second | 7 (25.0) | 10 (35.7) | ||
| Third | 7 (25.0) | 9 (32.1) | ||
| Fourth | 6 (21.4) | 5 (17.9) | ||
| Parents edu | ||||
| Primary | 6 (21.4) | 4 (14.3) | 1.249 | .524 |
| Secondary | 9 (32.1) | 13 (46.4) | ||
| Tertiary | 13 (46.4) | 11 (39.3) | ||
| Family size | ||||
| 5 & below | 8 (28.6) | 5 (17.9) | 2.808 | .422 |
| 6–10 | 11 (39.3) | 11 (39.3) | ||
| 11–15 | 3 (10.7) | 5 (17.9) | ||
| 16 & above | 6 (21.4) | 3 (10.7) | ||
Figure 1Participants flow diagram.
Summary of the value-based rational emotive behavior progamme.
| Objectives | Weeks | Sessions | Activities | Techniques |
| To familiarize present the participants with the operational documents and guidelines for the programme | 1 | 1 | Formal introduction and familiarization by a way of stating names, classes, religion, ethnicity etc. exchange of pleasantries, rapports and the establishment of norm, standard and decorum for the programme commencement. | Therapeutic agreement |
| Education on negative personal value system | 2–3 | 2–3 | Apt explanation of personal value system stressExplanation of negative personal value system | Bodily and mood observation technique |
| Highlighting of signs and symptoms of negative personal value system | 4–5 | 4–5 | Brief explanation of the traits, characteristics, signs and symptoms associated with negative personal value system.Exposition on how these signs and symptoms are related to negative personal value systemBrief revision, and take home activities were done | Bio-feedback, relaxing practical exercise techniques |
| Identification of negative personal value systems related behavior | 6 | 6 | How to identify conditions associated with negative personal value system.Highlighting and making meaningful the irrational conceptions of personal value system | Hypnosis and practice activities were the techniques |
| The subjects were given detailed and in-depth knowledge on the basis of the programme and its purposes. | 7 | 7 | The meaning of rational emotive behavior therapy was divulged to the students.Rational emotive behavior therapy was related negative personal values.Discussions were initiated on how to overcome conditions, events that are associated negative personal value system.Brief revision, and take home activities | Cognitive disputation, mood observation and practical exercise were the techniques |
| The researchers endeavoured to determine the ideolog, philosophies and irrational beliefs that preoccupy the subjects about their negative personal value system | 8 | 8 | The ideologies, philosophies and irrational beliefs systems that becloud negative value systems were identified and disputed through clarifications.Brief revision, and take home activities | Bio-feedback, relaxation, meditation and Yoga skills were the practical techniques |
| To dwell in positivism | 9 | 9 | Management of negative personal value system in the mist discouraging environmental conditions and challenging situations.Dealing with those identified irrational beliefs and emotional prompts that trigger negative personal value systems.Brief revision, and take home activities (conclusion of Self-Help form) | cognitive disputation, behavior and practice exercises, hypnosis, meditation, Soya skills and problem- solving are the techniques |
| The subjects were positioned to reduce unjustifiable and erroneous beliefs as well as over-evaluation of phenomena. They were also helped in the ways to make use of accurate beliefs and rational self-assessment. | 10 | 10 | The subjects were briefed how to have positive reflection on reality as to accurately apply them tackle life personal value situations,They were properly briefed on how to address and dispute any form of absolutism, imminent undue inferences and self-defeating ideologies.Brief revision, and take home activities | Cognitive disputation, behavioral practice, meditation, Yoga skills, problem- solving approach and Rational-emotive behavioral techniques |
| To help make life meaningful again through self- worth development | 11 | 11 | How to device coping strategies and face realities of life instead of the delimiting factors of negative personal value systems | Behavioral practicesCoping strategies, problem- solving approach, rational-emotive behavior, value redefinition skills, cognitive dismissal approach and practice activities. |
| Follow-up | 12 | 12 | Brief revision, and take home activities and termination of the session |
Regression analysis of participants’ responses on personal value and irrational belief.
| Change statistics | ||||||||||
| Model | Adjusted | Std. error of the estimate | df1 | df2 | Sig. | Durbin-watson | ||||
| Time1 | .682 | .466 | .456 | 2.72056 | .466 | 47.051 | 1 | 54 | .000 | 1.397 |
| Time2 | .748 | .560 | .551 | 3.34154 | .560 | 68.604 | 1 | 54 | .000 | .807 |
| Time3 | .806 | .650 | .644 | 2.87142 | .650 | 100.394 | 1 | 54 | .000 | .694 |
Levene's test of equality of error variances.
| df1 | df2 | Sig. | ||
| PrePV | 1.256 | 3 | 52 | .299 |
| PostPV | .396 | 3 | 52 | .757 |
| FPV | .787 | 3 | 52 | .507 |
Multivariate analysis of variance showing the effect of REBT on perceptions of personal value in Nigeria as measured by PVS.
| Time | Measures | Group | Mean (SD) | Δ | 95%CI | |||
| Pre-test | ||||||||
| PV | V-REBP | 105.29 (5.62) | .545 | .464 | .010 | .015 | 102.82–106.21 | |
| NCCG | 104.04 (6.26) | |||||||
| Post-test | ||||||||
| PV | V-REBP | 136.89 (6.94) | 76.229 | .001 | .594 | .629 | 127.41–130.88 | |
| NCCG | 121.96 (7.81) | |||||||
| Follow-up | ||||||||
| PV | V-REBP | 139.00 (5.49) | 130.286 | .001 | .715 | .743 | 128.61–131.61 | |
| NCCG | 121.96 (7.81) | |||||||