Literature DB >> 33157330

The effectiveness of photodynamic and antibiotic gel therapy as an adjunct to mechanical debridement in the treatment of peri-implantitis among diabetic patients.

Paras Ahmed1, Ishfaq A Bukhari2, Refal Albaijan3, Saeed A Sheikh2, Fahim Vohra4.   

Abstract

AIM: The current clinical trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of adjunctive photodynamic therapy (aPDT) and adjunctive antibiotic gel therapy (aAGT) to treat peri-implantitis among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: Selected T2DM participants with peri-implantitis were distributed into 3 groups: Group-1: received a single session of adjunctive (aPDT); Group-2: received a single session of adjunctive (aAGT) (metronidazole 400 mg and amoxicillin 500 mg); and Group-3: received MD alone. Clinical (probing depth [PD], bleeding on probing [BOP], and plaque scores [PS]) and radiographic (crestal bone loss [CBL]) peri-implant variables were recorded. Levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were assessed after the collection of peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF). All the evaluations were carried out at baseline, 3- and 6-months. The significance level was set to p < 0.05.
RESULTS: At 3-and 6-months of follow-up, all the three groups showed significant alleviation in PS (p < 0.05), BOP (p < 0.05), and PD (p < 0.05) when compared with the baseline. At baseline, no significant variation was observed in all clinical and radiographic peri-implant parameters among all three research groups. At 3-months follow-up, a considerable alleviation of in PS, BOP, PD, and CBL was noticeable in group-1 patients when compared with the baseline. At 6-months follow-up, a comparable difference was observed in BOP, PD, and CBL between group-1 and group-2. At baseline, no significant variation was observed in the PISF levels of IL-6 and TNF-α among all three research groups. At 3- and 6-months follow-up, a considerable alleviation of TNF-α and IL-6 levels was observed in group-1 and group-2 patients, respectively, when compared with the baseline.
CONCLUSION: The application of aPDT demonstrated improved clinical, radiographic, and immunological peri-implant parameters for the treatment of peri-implantitis among T2DM patients.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic therapy; Peri-Implantitis; Photodynamic therapy; T2DM;Diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33157330     DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther        ISSN: 1572-1000            Impact factor:   3.631


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Application of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.

Authors:  Tianyuan Zhao; Jungyul Song; Yuzhuo Ping; Meihua Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 2.  Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implant Diseases.

Authors:  Betul Rahman; Anirudh Balakrishna Acharya; Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui; Elise Verron; Zahi Badran
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.