Nicolas Mongardon1,2,3,4, Michael Piagnerelli5, David Grimaldi4,6, Bastien Perrot7, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou8,9. 1. Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010, Créteil, France. 2. Faculté de Santé, Univ Paris Est Créteil, 94010, Créteil, France. 3. U955-IMRB, Equipe 03 "Pharmacologie et Technologies Pour les Maladies Cardiovasculaires (PROTECT)", Inserm, Univ Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (EnVA), 94700, Maisons-Alfort, France. 4. AfterROSC Research Group, 75014, Paris, France. 5. Intensive Care, CHU-CharleroiMarie Curie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 140, Chaussée de Bruxelles, 6042, Charleroi, Belgium. 6. Soins Intensifs, Hôpital Erasme, ULB, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Bruxelles, Belgium. 7. UMR_S 1246 Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Health Research, Nantes University, 44000, Nantes, France. 8. AfterROSC Research Group, 75014, Paris, France. Jeanbaptiste.lascarrou@chu-nantes.fr. 9. Médecine Intensive Réanimation, University Hospital Center of Nantes, 30 Boulevard Jean Monnet, 44000, Nantes Cedex 9, France. Jeanbaptiste.lascarrou@chu-nantes.fr.
Dear Editor,Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is challenging. As pro-inflammatory patterns and cytokine storm are among the hallmarks of severe COVID-19 pneumonia, early low dose of corticosteroids (CTC) has been proved to be effective in the RECOVERY trial [1] and subsequent meta-analysis [2]. However, a large proportion of patients remained dependent of mechanical ventilation at the end of the CTC therapy, and questions about late administration and possibly high doses of CTC to prevent or treat lung fibrosis in persistent ARDS [3] are unresolved. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the impact of late CTC for COVID-19 ARDS patients versus the absence of CTC administration.We performed a post hoc analysis from the COVADIS project, a multicenter observational study gathering 21 French and Belgian intensive care units (ICUs) [4]. All consecutive patients (from 10/03 to 15/04/2020) with moderate to severe ARDS according to Berlin definition under invasive ventilation and positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR were included. We studied patients who did not receive (no CTC group) or received CTC later than 13 days after symptoms onset (75% percentile of patients included in the RECOVERY trial [1]) (CTC group). We analyzed the effect of CTC administration on ICU 90-day survival with a Cox model by specifying the delay between intubation and administration of CTC as a time-dependent covariate. Potential confounding factors (age, gender, body mass index, hypertension, prone position, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), comorbidities, static compliance and PaO2/FiO2 at intubation) were tested for inclusion in the final model. The same strategy was used to study the effect of CTC on mechanical ventilation duration, after censoring for death. The study was approved by appropriate regulatory French and Belgian committees, with the information of the patient or next of kin.After exclusion of patients who: withdraw consent (n = 1), were included in other studies on CTC (n = 22), received early CTC (n = 24), or were lost to follow-up, 348 patients were finally analyzed.Patients received a median dose of 1 [1, 2] mg/kg of methylprednisolone equivalent, 21 [18-26] days after symptoms onset (eSupplement). Delay between intubation and late initiation of CTC was 11 [8-16] days (n = 57 treated patients). In the final Cox model, late initiation of CTC was neither associated with lower ICU mortality (HR = 1.44; 95% CI [0.83–2.50]) nor with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (HR = 0.89; 95% CI [0.60–1.33] (Tables 1, 2).
Table 1
Cox regression model for ICU 90-day mortality with late CTC administration as a time-dependent covariate
Hazard ratio
p value
95% confidence interval
Late CTC administration
1.44
0.200
0.83–2.50
Age of patient
1.08
0.000
1.04–1.11
Static compliance at intubation
0.980
0.019
0.963–0.997
VV-ECMO
2.11
0.003
1.28–3.47
Charlson score
1.17
0.000
1.08–1.25
Age × timea
0.998
0.004
0.996–0.999
aInteraction term between age of patient and time (days)
Table 2
Cox regression model for MV release with late CTC administration as a time-dependent covariate
Hazard ratio
p value
95% confidence interval
Late CTC administration
0.89
0.577
0.60–1.33
Age of patient
0.967
0.000
0.953–0.981
Prone position
0.51
0.000
0.36–0.71
VV-ECMO
0.30
0.000
0.19–0.49
Cox regression model for ICU 90-day mortality with late CTC administration as a time-dependent covariateaInteraction term between age of patient and time (days)Cox regression model for MV release with late CTC administration as a time-dependent covariateEarly CTC treatment has demonstrated survival benefit in severe COVID-19 pneumonia, and has been endorsed by WHO [1, 2]. Conversely, no data are available on the impact of late CTC administration [5]. This post hoc analysis of a homogeneous cohort of the most severe critically ill patients found that late CTC administration did not improve the patient-centered outcomes.To conclude, while early administration of low-dose CTC should be encouraged in severe COVID-19 pneumonia, late high-dose CTC appear to be non-beneficial in late non-resolving ARDS. Furthers trials are needed to better define the use of CTC in ARDS related to COVID-19.Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 KB)
Authors: Kenneth P Steinberg; Leonard D Hudson; Richard B Goodman; Catherine Lee Hough; Paul N Lanken; Robert Hyzy; B Taylor Thompson; Marek Ancukiewicz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jonathan A C Sterne; Srinivas Murthy; Janet V Diaz; Arthur S Slutsky; Jesús Villar; Derek C Angus; Djillali Annane; Luciano Cesar Pontes Azevedo; Otavio Berwanger; Alexandre B Cavalcanti; Pierre-Francois Dequin; Bin Du; Jonathan Emberson; David Fisher; Bruno Giraudeau; Anthony C Gordon; Anders Granholm; Cameron Green; Richard Haynes; Nicholas Heming; Julian P T Higgins; Peter Horby; Peter Jüni; Martin J Landray; Amelie Le Gouge; Marie Leclerc; Wei Shen Lim; Flávia R Machado; Colin McArthur; Ferhat Meziani; Morten Hylander Møller; Anders Perner; Marie Warrer Petersen; Jelena Savovic; Bruno Tomazini; Viviane C Veiga; Steve Webb; John C Marshall Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Peter Horby; Wei Shen Lim; Jonathan R Emberson; Marion Mafham; Jennifer L Bell; Louise Linsell; Natalie Staplin; Christopher Brightling; Andrew Ustianowski; Einas Elmahi; Benjamin Prudon; Christopher Green; Timothy Felton; David Chadwick; Kanchan Rege; Christopher Fegan; Lucy C Chappell; Saul N Faust; Thomas Jaki; Katie Jeffery; Alan Montgomery; Kathryn Rowan; Edmund Juszczak; J Kenneth Baillie; Richard Haynes; Martin J Landray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Ali I Al-Gareeb; Hebatallah M Saad; Hayder M Al-Kuraishy Journal: Inflammopharmacology Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 5.093
Authors: Antoni Torres; Ana Motos; Catia Cillóniz; Adrián Ceccato; Laia Fernández-Barat; Albert Gabarrús; Jesús Bermejo-Martin; Ricard Ferrer; Jordi Riera; Raquel Pérez-Arnal; Dario García-Gasulla; Oscar Peñuelas; José Ángel Lorente; David de Gonzalo-Calvo; Raquel Almansa; Rosario Menéndez; Andrea Palomeque; Rosario Amaya Villar; José M Añón; Ana Balan Mariño; Carme Barberà; José Barberán; Aaron Blandino Ortiz; Maria Victoria Boado; Elena Bustamante-Munguira; Jesús Caballero; María Luisa Cantón-Bulnes; Cristina Carbajales Pérez; Nieves Carbonell; Mercedes Catalán-González; Raul de Frutos; Nieves Franco; Cristóbal Galbán; Víctor D Gumucio-Sanguino; Maria Del Carmen de la Torre; Emili Díaz; Ángel Estella; Elena Gallego; José Luis García Garmendia; José M Gómez; Arturo Huerta; Ruth Noemí Jorge García; Ana Loza-Vázquez; Judith Marin-Corral; María Cruz Martin Delgado; Amalia Martínez de la Gándara; Ignacio Martínez Varela; Juan López Messa; Guillermo M Albaiceta; Maite Nieto; Mariana Andrea Novo; Yhivian Peñasco; Felipe Pérez-García; Juan Carlos Pozo-Laderas; Pilar Ricart; Victor Sagredo; Angel Sánchez-Miralles; Susana Sancho Chinesta; Mireia Serra-Fortuny; Lorenzo Socias; Jordi Solé-Violan; Fernando Suarez-Sipmann; Luis Tamayo Lomas; José Trenado; Alejandro Úbeda; Luis Jorge Valdivia; Pablo Vidal; Ferran Barbé Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 41.787