Literature DB >> 33156102

Pediatric Solid Gastric Emptying Scintigraphy: Normative Value Guidelines and Nonstandard Meal Alternatives.

Thomas S C Ng1,2,3, Niharika Putta4, Neha S Kwatra1,3, Laura A Drubach1,3, Rachel Rosen5, Frederic H Fahey1,3, Alejandro Flores5,6, Samuel Nurko5,6, Stephan D Voss1,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adult standards for gastric emptying scintigraphy, including the type of meal and range of normative values for percent gastric emptying, are routinely used in pediatric practice, but to date have not been validated. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of adult criteria for gastric emptying scintigraphy is valid for children and whether alternative nonstandard meals can also be offered based on these criteria.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients (n = 1,151 total) who underwent solid-phase gastric emptying scintigraphy. Patients were stratified into normal and delayed gastric emptying cohorts based on adult criteria, i.e., with normal gastric emptying defined as ≤10% gastric retention at 4 hours. Patients were further stratified based on the type of meal, namely complete or partial adult standard meals or alternative cheese-based meals. Percent gastric retention values at 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours were compared.
RESULTS: The median (95% upper reference limit) percentage gastric retention values for the complete standard meal were 72% (93%) at 1 hour, 39% (65%) at 2 hours, 15% (33%) at 3 hours, and 6% (10 %) at 4 hours. By comparison, the values for cheese-based meals were 60% (87%) at 1 hour, 29% (61%) at 2 hours, 10% (30%) at 3 hours, and 5% (10%) at 4 hours. Consumption of at least 50% of the standard meal yielded similar retention percentages; 68% (89%) at 1 hour, 32% (57%) at 2 hours, 10% (29%) at 3 hours, and 5% (10%) at 4 hours. There were no significant age- or sex-specific differences using the adult criteria. DISCUSSION: The adult normative standards for gastric emptying scintigraphy are applicable for use in the pediatric population. These same standards can be also be applied to nonstandard meal options, including cheese-based alternative meals and partial standard meals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33156102     DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  3 in total

1.  Meal-Induced Symptoms in Children with Dyspepsia-Relationships to Sex and the Presence of Gastroparesis.

Authors:  Liz Febo-Rodriguez; Bruno P Chumpitazi; Salma Musaad; Andrew C Sher; Robert J Shulman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Prucalopride for Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Children.

Authors:  Suzanna Hirsch; Samuel Nurko; Paul Mitchell; Rachel Rosen
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.930

3.  Risk Factors for Bile Aspiration and its Impact on Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Rachel Rosen; Margot Lurie; Madeline Kane; Courtney DiFilippo; Alexandra Cohen; Dawn Freiberger; Debra Boyer; Gary Visner; Monica Narvaez-Rivas; Enju Liu; Kenneth Setchell
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.488

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.