PURPOSE: To describe the variability of the radial artery (RA) diameters at 2 levels, proximal (pRA), within 2 cm to the styloid process, and distal (dRA) at the snuff box, both eligible accesses for percutaneous approach, and to correlate these diameters with population features. METHODS: A total of 700 patients (377 females, 323 males) have been enrolled from July 2018 to March 2019. The diameters of left and right RA were measured using ultrasound (US) examination. Diameters of pRA and dRA were compared between different sex and CRF (tabagism, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, BMI > 30, diabetes) using multivariate analysis and unpaired t test; the feasibility of radial access was evaluated considering a diameter ≥ of 2 mm as a cut-off or a vessel/sheath ratio >1. The time needed to perform each assessment of the four vessels was recorded. RESULTS: The average proximal diameter of pRA was 2.58 mm (sd = 0.58 mm). The caliber of the dRA resulted 19.5% lower than the proximal one, with an average diameter of 1.99 mm (sd = 0.47 mm). On unpaired t test, a significant difference was reported for two of the parameters taken into account: sex and a BMI > 30. CONCLUSION: Our results show that 88% of patients have an estimated radial artery caliber suitable for pTRA at US examination. Males and patients with BMI > 30 show a higher mean pRA and dRA; thus, they could be the ideal candidates for radial access.
PURPOSE: To describe the variability of the radial artery (RA) diameters at 2 levels, proximal (pRA), within 2 cm to the styloid process, and distal (dRA) at the snuff box, both eligible accesses for percutaneous approach, and to correlate these diameters with population features. METHODS: A total of 700 patients (377 females, 323 males) have been enrolled from July 2018 to March 2019. The diameters of left and right RA were measured using ultrasound (US) examination. Diameters of pRA and dRA were compared between different sex and CRF (tabagism, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, BMI > 30, diabetes) using multivariate analysis and unpaired t test; the feasibility of radial access was evaluated considering a diameter ≥ of 2 mm as a cut-off or a vessel/sheath ratio >1. The time needed to perform each assessment of the four vessels was recorded. RESULTS: The average proximal diameter of pRA was 2.58 mm (sd = 0.58 mm). The caliber of the dRA resulted 19.5% lower than the proximal one, with an average diameter of 1.99 mm (sd = 0.47 mm). On unpaired t test, a significant difference was reported for two of the parameters taken into account: sex and a BMI > 30. CONCLUSION: Our results show that 88% of patients have an estimated radial artery caliber suitable for pTRA at US examination. Males and patients with BMI > 30 show a higher mean pRA and dRA; thus, they could be the ideal candidates for radial access.
Entities:
Keywords:
Interventional radiology; Radial access; Snuff box; Us evaluation
Authors: Alexandru Achim; Tímea Szigethy; Dorottya Olajos; Levente Molnár; Roland Papp; György Bárczi; Kornél Kákonyi; István F Édes; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely; Jef Van den Eynde; Zoltán Ruzsa Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-05-09