| Literature DB >> 33154639 |
Yuanfeng Xue1, Junhong Ding1, Yulong Liu2, Yuchun Pan1, Penglai Zhao3, Zhiwen Ren1, Jian Xu1, Liangliang Ye1, Ying Xu2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious health problem with few available treatment options. Rh-erythropoietin (rh-EPO) is a potential therapeutic drug for TBI, but it cannot cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) directly. In this regard, a novel strategy to deliver rh-EPO for enhanced TBI treatment is via the development of Tween 80 modified albumin nanoparticles using electrostatic spray technology.Entities:
Keywords: Tween 80 modified albumin nanoparticle; electrostatic spray technology; rh-erythropoietin; traumatic brain injury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33154639 PMCID: PMC7608583 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S264025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1The Schematic diagram of the electrostatic spray technology.
Particle Size and Zeta Potential of rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs Prepared at Different Voltages (Mean ± SD, n=3)
| Voltages | Lognormal Median Diam. By Number (nm) | Polydispersity | Zeta Potential (mv) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20kV | 637 ± 48 | 0.302 ± 0.021 | −28.81 ± 3.11 |
| 24kV | 562 ± 31 | 0.270 ± 0.042 | −21.45 ± 2.52 |
| 28kV | 458 ± 29 | 0.245 ± 0.039 | −24.92 ± 3.84 |
Figure 2SEM photograph of rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs prepared by different flow rates (A) 0.5 mL/h; (B) 1 mL/h.
Figure 3SEM photograph of rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs prepared by different acceptance distances (A) 20 cm; (B) 25 cm.
Figure 4(A) TEM and DLS photographs of rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs. (B) SEM photograph of rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs. (C) The stability of rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs. (D) In vitro release of rh-EPO injection and rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs in PBS medium. (E) Photographs of the microglia cells, motor neurocyte and astroglia treated with culture medium (control), blank-Tw-ABNPs and rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs, respectively.
Figure 5(A) Western blotting of EPO, AQP4, GFAP, and β-actin treated with sham operation, TBI+ saline, TBI+ rh-EPO solution, TBI+ rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs. (B) Quality analysis of Western blotting by Image J. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with sham group). (C) The brain water content of the rats treated with sham operation, TBI+ saline, TBI+ rh-EPO solution, TBI+ rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.005, compared with sham group). (D) The brain water content of TBI rats at 12, 24, 36 h after administration with saline, or rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs (2500 IU/kg or 5000 IU/kg), respectively. (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.005, compared with saline treated group). (E) Immunohistochemical image of AQP4 and GFAP in brain tissue section treated with different operations.
Figure 6H&E of (A) sham operation group; (B) TBI+ saline (black arrows show edema and the yellow arrows indicate the pyknosis nucleus in the injury brain); (C) rh-EPO solution; (D) TBI+ rh-EPO-Tw-ABNPs.