Literature DB >> 33154633

The Value of Hope: Patients' and Physicians' Preferences for Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Brett Hauber1, John R Penrod2, David Gebben1, Lina Musallam2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Immuno-oncology treatments offer patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment options with greater probability of durable survival and a different toxicity profile compared with traditional chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to explore the importance of increases in the probability of long-term survival versus changes in expected (median) survival and treatment toxicities among patients with advanced NSCLC and physicians. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a discrete-choice experiment, oncologists and patients diagnosed with NSCLC chose between profiles of treatments for advanced NSCLC offering different combinations of benefits (expected, best-case, and worst-case survival) and risks. We analyzed preference data from each sample using a random-parameters logit model that controls for preference heterogeneity and the panel nature of the data.
RESULTS: Both patients and physicians expressed a strong preference for improving the probability of best-case survival; however, patients viewed increases in the probability of long-term survival as more important than increases in expected survival, while the opposite was true for physicians. Both patients and physicians weighted survival to be more important than toxicities.
CONCLUSION: This study identified a potentially important divergence between physician and patient perspectives on survival statistics. Physicians placed more importance on increases in expected survival than did patients with NSCLC. The importance patients placed on long-term survival reinforce previous research identifying the primacy of hope as a value among seriously ill patients. The findings underscore the importance of considering patients' priorities and in shared decision-making when choosing treatment.
© 2020 Hauber et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discrete-choice experiment; immunotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer; patient preferences; physician preferences; survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 33154633      PMCID: PMC7608144          DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S248295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence        ISSN: 1177-889X            Impact factor:   2.711


  36 in total

1.  Updated Analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score of 50% or Greater.

Authors:  Martin Reck; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Andrew G Robinson; Rina Hui; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Maya Gottfried; Nir Peled; Ali Tafreshi; Sinead Cuffe; Mary O'Brien; Suman Rao; Katsuyuki Hotta; Kristel Vandormael; Antonio Riccio; Jing Yang; M Catherine Pietanza; Julie R Brahmer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The urgent need to improve the tools to assess clinical benefit and value of cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alberto Sobrero; Alberto Puccini; Giacomo Bregni; Paolo Bruzzi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Treatment recommendations for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: does patient preference matter?

Authors:  Helen A Powell; David R Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-10

4.  A comparison of preferences of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma between the patient group and health care professional group in South Korea.

Authors:  Mi-Hai Park; Changik Jo; Eun Young Bae; Eui-Kyung Lee
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Patient benefit-risk preferences for targeted agents in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ateesha F Mohamed; A Brett Hauber; Maureen P Neary
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Patient Versus Physician Valuation of Durable Survival Gains: Implications for Value Framework Assessments.

Authors:  Jason Shafrin; Taylor T Schwartz; Tony Okoro; John A Romley
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 7.  Immunotherapy Comes of Age in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Khanna; Normand Blais; Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau; Luis Corrales-Rodriguez
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Comparing the Relative Importance of Attributes of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatments to Patients and Physicians in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Juan Marcos González; Justin Doan; David J Gebben; Marco Boeri; Mayer Fishman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Immunotherapy for Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Future Obstacles.

Authors:  Ju Hwan Cho
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 6.303

10.  Patient and Oncology Nurse Preferences for the Treatment Options in Advanced Melanoma: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Frank Xiaoqing Liu; Edward A Witt; Scot Ebbinghaus; Grace DiBonaventura Beyer; Enrique Basurto; Richard W Joseph
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

View more
  2 in total

1.  Physician Preferences and Shared-Decision Making for the Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Discrete-Choice Experiment Study in China.

Authors:  Juntao Yan; Yan Wei; Yue Teng; Shimeng Liu; Fuming Li; Shiyi Bao; Yanfeng Ren; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Immunotherapy Versus Hospice: Treatment Decision-Making in the Modern Era of Novel Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Amy An; David Hui
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.075

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.