| Literature DB >> 33154417 |
Deborah A van den Brink1,2, Tim de Meij3, Daniella Brals4,5, Robert H J Bandsma6,7,8,9, Johnstone Thitiri8,10, Moses Ngari8,10, Laura Mwalekwa10, Nanne K H de Boer11, Alfian Wicaksono12, James A Covington12, Patrick F van Rheenen6, Wieger P Voskuijl13,14,15,16.
Abstract
Children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) display immature, altered gut microbiota and have a high mortality risk. Faecal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) reflect the microbiota composition and may provide insight into metabolic dysfunction that occurs in SAM. Here we determine whether analysis of faecal VOCs could identify children with SAM with increased risk of mortality. VOC profiles from children who died within six days following admission were compared to those who were discharged alive using machine learning algorithms. VOC profiles of children who died could be separated from those who were discharged with fair accuracy (AUC) = 0.71; 95% CI 0.59-0.87; P = 0.004). We present the first study showing differences in faecal VOC profiles between children with SAM who survived and those who died. VOC analysis holds potential to help discover metabolic pathways within the intestinal microbiome with causal association with mortality and target treatments in children with SAM.Trial Registration: The F75 study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02246296.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33154417 PMCID: PMC7645771 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75515-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of study participants upon admission and by outcome (discharged vs. died).
| SAM | Discharged | Died | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coast Provincial General Hospital | 25 (43.9) | 15 (39.5) | 10 (52.6) | |
| Kilifi County Hospital | 5 (8.8) | 4 (10.5) | 1 (5.3) | |
| Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital | 27 (47.4) | 19 (50.0) | 8 (42.1) | 0.59 |
| Age [mean (SD)], months | 22.9 (15.7) | 25.9 (16.1) | 16.8 (13.3) | 0.04 |
| Male [n (%)] | 35 (61.4) | 23 (60.5) | 12 (63.2) | 0.85 |
| Fully breastfed [n (%)] | 23 (40.4) | 14 (36.8) | 9 (47.4) | 0.45 |
| MUAC cm | 11.2 (1.6) | 11.5 (1.6) | 10.5 (1.5) | 0.03 |
| Height-for-age z-score | 55; − 3.1 (1.7) | 38; − 3.2 (1.5) | 17; − 3.1 (2.3) | 0.9 |
| Weight-for-age z-score | − 4.0 (1.4) | − 3.8 (1.3) | − 4.3 (1.6) | 0.17 |
| Weight-for-height z-score | 53; − 3.3 (1.4) | 37; − 3.1 (1.4) | 16; − 3.7 (1.4) | 0.19 |
| Oedema [n (%)] | 22 (38.6) | 17 (44.7) | 5 (26.3) | 0.18 |
| Vomiting [n (%)] | 14 (24.6) | 7 (18.4) | 7 (36.8) | 0.13 |
| Diarrhoea [n (%)] | 23 (40.4) | 12 (31.6) | 11 (57.9) | 0.06 |
| Negative | 38 (66.7) | 28 (73.7) | 10 (52.6) | |
| Positive | 14 (24.6) | 7 (18.4) | 7 (36.8) | |
| Refusal or died before HIV testing | 5 (8.8) | 3 (7.9) | 2 (10.5) | 0.26 |
| Tuberculosis [n (%)] | 1 (1.8) | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0.48 |
| Fever [T > 38 °C; n (%)] | 19 (33.3) | 9 (23.7) | 10 (52.6) | 0.03 |
| Severe pneumonia [n (%)] | 17 (29.8) | 10 (26.3) | 7 (36.8) | 0.42 |
| Any danger signs at admission [n (%)]* | 8 (14.0) | 2 (5.3) | 6 (31.6) | 0.006 |
MUAC mid upper arm circumference, HIV human immunodeficiency virus 1.
*World Health Organisation (WHO) danger signs suggestive of systemic illness or clinical deterioration (respiratory distress, profuse diarrhoea, hypoglycaemia, tachycardia, etc).
Characteristics of study participants with SAM and healthy control children.
| Healthy controls | SAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 7 | |||
| Age [months; mean (SD)] | 52.9 (22.1) | 22.9 (15.7) | < 0.001 |
| Male [ | 4 (57.1) | 35 (61.4) | 0.83 |
| MUAC [mean (SD)] | 15.1 (2.0) | 11.2 (1.6) | < 0.001 |
MUAC mid upper arm circumference.
Figure 1Feature map illustrating locations on the FAIMS output from children who died within 6 days of admission. (A) Positive feature locations (B) Negative feature locations.
Machine learning classification results.
| Best performing algorithm | Features (number) | AUC (95% CI) | P | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | PPV | NPV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality vs. survival | Support vector machine | 100 | 0.71 (0.56–0.87) | 0.004 | 0.76 (0.6–0.89) | 0.63 (0.38–0.84) | 0.81 | 0.57 |
| Early mortality vs. survival | Random forest | 100 | 0.73 (0.57–0.9) | 0.02 | 0.89 (0.52–1) | 0.55 (0.38–0.71) | 0.32 | 0.95 |
| Late mortality vs. survival | Sparse logistic regression | 50 | 0.82 (0.67–0.96) | < 0.001 | 0.82 (0.66–0.92) | 0.7 (0.35–0.93) | 0.91 | 0.5 |
| Early vs. late mortality | Support vector machine | 50 | 0.8 (0.57–1) | 0.001 | 0.78 (0.4–0.97) | 0.8 (0.44–0.97) | 0.78 | 0.8 |
| SAM vs. healthy controls | Sparse logistic regression | 100 | 0.99 (0.98–1) | < 0.001 | 0.96 (0.88–1) | 1 (0.59–1) | 1 | 0.78 |
| WAZ ≤ − 3 vs. WAZ > − 3 | Sparse logistic regression | 100 | 0.7 (0.54–0.86) | 0.02 | 0.73 (0.39–0.94) | 0.7 (0.54–0.82) | 0.36 | 0.91 |
| Oedema vs. no oedema | Sparse logistic regression | 20 | 0.71 (0.56–0.87) | 0.003 | 0.77 (0.55–0.92) | 0.66 (0.48–0.81) | 0.59 | 0.82 |
| Diarrhoea vs. no diarrhoea | Support vector machine | 100 | 0.66 (0.51–0.81) | 0.02 | 0.45 (0.24–0.68) | 0.89 (0.73–0.97) | 0.71 | 0.72 |
| Pneumonia vs. no pneumonia | Gaussian process | 100 | 0.63 (0.47–0.75) | 0.06 | 0.59 (0.33–0.82) | 0.73 (0.56–0.85) | 0.48 | 0.81 |
| HIV + vs. HIV − | Support vector machine | 100 | 0.73 (0.58–0.87) | 0.01 | 0.93 (0.66–1) | 0.53 (0.36–0.69) | 0.42 | 0.95 |
| Age > 2 yrs. vs. age ≤ 2 yrs | Random forest | 20 | 0.79 (0.66–0.92) | < 0.001 | 0.75 (0.51–0.91) | 0.76 (0.59–0.88) | 0.63 | 0.85 |
AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, WAZ weight-for-age z-score, HIV human immunodeficiency virus 1, yrs. years.
Definitions: early mortality = mortality within 3 days of admission; late mortality = mortality on day 4, 5, or 6 of admission.
Figure 2(A) Mortality v survival. Support vector machine (100 features). (B) Early mortality v survival. Random forest (100 features). (C) Late mortality v survival. Sparse logistic regression (50 features). (D) Early mortality v late mortality. Support vector machine (50 features).