Paul H C Stirling1, Paul J Jenkins2, Nicholas D Clement3, Andrew D Duckworth3, Jane E McEachan4. 1. Department of Hand Surgery, Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, United Kingdom. Electronic address: phcstirling@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 3. Departmental of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Hand Surgery, Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study describes the impact of self-reported hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure on patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction after carpal tunnel release. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), patient satisfaction, and 5-level EuroQol-5D questionnaires before and after surgery. Patient-reported outcomes were available for 475 patients (78% follow-up at a mean of 14 months). Fifteen patients were excluded, giving a final cohort of 460 patients. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients reported HAV exposure (26%). Median postoperative QuickDASH and QuickDASH improvement were significantly worse in the HAV-exposed group, although both groups improved after surgery. Multivariable linear regression revealed a significantly worse postoperative score and change in QuickDASH in HAV-exposed patients. There was no difference in satisfaction, but after surgery, the 5-level EuroQol-5D score was significantly worse in HAV-exposed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Carpal tunnel release in HAV-exposed patients results in a significantly lower improvement in self-reported disability compared with patients without HAV exposure. This study provides important prognostic information for patients with previous HAV exposure undergoing carpal tunnel release. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic III.
PURPOSE: This study describes the impact of self-reported hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure on patient-reported outcomes, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction after carpal tunnel release. METHODS: We prospectively collected data from Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), patient satisfaction, and 5-level EuroQol-5D questionnaires before and after surgery. Patient-reported outcomes were available for 475 patients (78% follow-up at a mean of 14 months). Fifteen patients were excluded, giving a final cohort of 460 patients. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients reported HAV exposure (26%). Median postoperative QuickDASH and QuickDASH improvement were significantly worse in the HAV-exposed group, although both groups improved after surgery. Multivariable linear regression revealed a significantly worse postoperative score and change in QuickDASH in HAV-exposed patients. There was no difference in satisfaction, but after surgery, the 5-level EuroQol-5D score was significantly worse in HAV-exposed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Carpal tunnel release in HAV-exposed patients results in a significantly lower improvement in self-reported disability compared with patients without HAV exposure. This study provides important prognostic information for patients with previous HAV exposure undergoing carpal tunnel release. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic III.