Literature DB >> 33153465

Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factor for postoperative delirium following spinal surgery.

Hao Jie Zhang1, Xue Hai Ma1, Jin Biao Ye1, Cong Zhi Liu1, Zhi Yang Zhou2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is a common psychiatric disorder among patients who undergo spinal surgery. The purpose of current meta-analysis was to assess the potential risk factors related to delirium in spinal surgery.
METHODS: We searched the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, from inception to July 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies using the previously described Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). We included spinal surgery patients who suffered with delirium or not. Stata 12.0 was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Thirteen trial studies that met our inclusion criteria were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Postoperative delirium was associated with an increase of the duration of hospital stay (P = 0.044) and increased perioperative readmission rate (P = 0.013) and economic costs (P = 0.002). This meta-analysis demonstrates that there were twenty-two risk factors: general characteristic: old age, female patients, history of surgery, diabetes mellitus, hypertension; preoperative data: low hematocrit, low hemoglobin, low albumin, low sodium, depression; operative data: operating time, total blood loss; postoperative data: low sodium, low hemoglobin, low hematocrit, low albumin, fever, low potassium, blood sugar, and visual analog scale (VAS).
CONCLUSIONS: Delirium not only prolongs the length of hospital stay, but also increases readmission rate and the economic costs. Several risk factors including old age, female patients, history of surgery, diabetes mellitus, low hematocrit, low hemoglobin, low albumin, low sodium, depression; operative data: operating time, total blood loss, low sodium, low hemoglobin, low hematocrit, low albumin, fever, low potassium, blood sugar, and VAS were significant predictors for postoperative delirium after spinal surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delirium; Meta-analysis; Risk factor; Spinal surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33153465      PMCID: PMC7643448          DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02035-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


Background

Delirium is defined as an acute disorder of attention and cognition and is associated with underlying physiological disorders [1]. Postoperative delirium after spinal surgery was a common complication in older patients. The incidence of postoperative delirium after spinal surgery has been widely reported in the literature and ranges from 18.4 to 40.5% [2]. Patients with delirious state were associated with a prolonged hospital stay, increased the economic costs, and impaired individual’s function and quality of life [3]. Postoperative delirium occurs in many surgeries, including major vascular surgery, hip surgery, and spinal surgery [4, 5]. However, the mechanism of delirium was unclear. Thus, understanding the risk factor for delirium in spinal patients was important. A meta-analysis review by Shi et al. [6] evaluated the risk factor of delirium after spinal surgery. However, it contained some methodological shortcomings; all of the risk factors were not evaluated and with high heterogeneity. Not only did these studies have these limitations, but also they did not individually separate preoperative hemoglobin level and postoperative hemoglobin level. Considering all these issues and new evidence emerging, it is impossible to give clear advice on the risk factor of the delirium after spinal surgery. Thus, we undertook a further meta-analysis to identify the risk factors for delirium in spinal surgery patients.

Methods

This study was designed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement [7].

Literature search

We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to July 2020. The search terms were [delirium OR confusion OR transient mental disorder OR dementia OR cognitive disorders] AND [spine OR spinal OR lumbar infusion] AND [surgery OR operation]. We also searched the references of the included studies and recent reviews or meta-analysis.

Study selection

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) patients who had undergone spinal surgery; (ii) the studies’ design was observational or cohort study; (iii) delirium and controls diagnosed by delirium assessment tool; (iv) studies reporting adequate data for pooling for the analysis; (v) studies published in Chinese or English. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) review articles, letter, or comments; (ii) studies without available data for statistics; (iii) there were no diagnostic criteria for delirium after spinal surgery.

Data extraction

All the data were extracted by two authors from all eligible studies (Hao-Jie Zhang and Xue-Hai Ma). The following variables were extracted from each study: first author’s name, publication year, country, study design, study setting, sample size, age, sex ratio, criteria for delirium, screening frequency, study quality score. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion or consulted from a senior reviewer to reach a consensus.

Quality assessment

Two reviewers (Jin-Biao Ye and Cong-Zhi Liu) independently assessed the quality of the included studies using the previously described Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [8]. A total of three items were included: (1) patient selection, (2) comparability of the two study arms, and (3) assessment of the outcomes. Studies were classified according to quality: high quality (7–9), moderate quality (5–6), poor quality (0–4).

Data synthesis and analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted in Stata 12.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX). We estimated the pooled risk ratios (RRs) for the binary variable and weighted mean differences (WMD) for the continuous data. We used random effects model or fixed effects model according to the heterogeneity between the studies. We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I square (I2) values (I2 > 50% was considered to imply statistical heterogeneity).

Results

First, we initially yielded 355 relevant studies from electronic databases and 2 additional records through other sources, of which 137 publications were excluded because they were duplications. After reading the title and abstract of these 218 papers, 203 papers were excluded as they did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. Then, 2 studies were excluded after reading the full-text; one study was not interested in delirium but for readmission; another study did not include risk factor of delirium. Ultimately, thirteen trials [9-21] met the inclusion criteria. The flow diagram of study selection is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

The flow diagram of the study identification and inclusion and exclusion process

The flow diagram of the study identification and inclusion and exclusion process

Study characteristics and quality assessment

General characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 1. The publication year of the 24 studies ranged from 2004 to 2018. Four studies were published in the USA, three studies originated from China, three originated from Japan, and the rest were from Korea. Study quality score ranged from 6 to 9.
Table 1

The general characteristic of the included studies

ReferenceCountryStudy designStudy settingSample sizeAge (year)Sex ratio (M:F)Criteria for deliriumScreening frequency (h)Study quality score
Adogwa et al. [9]USARCSCorrection of adult degenerative scoliosis8271.8NSCAMn.s7
Brown et al. [10]USACohortLumbar spine surgery, posterior cervical spine surgery, or anterior cervical spine897447/42CAM24 h9
Elsamadicy et al. [11]USAElective spine surgeryNS7
Fineberg et al. [12]USARCSLumbar spine578,457ICD-9-CMNS6
Gao et al. [13]ChinaRCSCervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine54948.2DOS, DSM-IV24 h6
Jiang et al. [14]ChinaRCSFusion, decompressive laminectomy and discectomy of the lumbar spine, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminoplasty, and foraminotomy of the cervical spine45165.1226/225NSNS6
Kawaguchi et al. [15]JapanRCSCervical spine, cervico-thoracic spine in the thoracic spine, in the thoraco-lumbar spine, in the lumbar spine, and cervical and lumbar spine34159.2186/155CAMNS6
Kobayashi et al. [16]JapanRCSCervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine26282.7122/140CONFUCIUS stepped wedge protocolNS8
Lee et al. [17]KoreaRCSAnterior fusion and posterolateral fusion8173.528/53DSM-IV, CAMNS8
Seo et al. [18]KoreaRCSOperation, decompressive laminectomy and discectomy of the lumbar spine, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, laminoplasty and foraminotomy of the cervical spine7070.132/38DSM-5NS9
Ushida et al. [19]JapanRCSCervical myelopathy81NS41/41NSNS8
Li et al. [20]ChinaRCSSpinal surgery11675.362/54CAM-ICU24 h6
Adogwa et al. [21]USARCSSpinal deformity surgery8274.764/18CAM-ICUNS8

RCS retrospective controlled study, CAM-ICU Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, CAM Confusion Assessment Method, DSM-5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5

The general characteristic of the included studies RCS retrospective controlled study, CAM-ICU Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, CAM Confusion Assessment Method, DSM-5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5

Results of meta-analysis

There was also a statistically significant association of delirium with increased duration of hospital stay (MD = 1.71 (95% CI 0.05 to 3.37) days; P = 0.044; Fig. 2) and increased perioperative readmission rate (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.03, P = 0.013, Fig. 3) and economic costs (MD = 16166.37 (95% CI 5988.62 to 26,344.11) P = 0.002, Fig. 4).
Fig. 2

The forest plot for duration of hospital stay in the delirium group versus the non-delirium group

Fig. 3

The forest plot for readmission rate in the delirium group versus the non-delirium group

Fig. 4

The forest plot for economic costs in the delirium group versus the non-delirium group

The forest plot for duration of hospital stay in the delirium group versus the non-delirium group The forest plot for readmission rate in the delirium group versus the non-delirium group The forest plot for economic costs in the delirium group versus the non-delirium group

Risk factors

Patients who developed delirium were significantly older (age > 65, RR = 6.13 (95% CI 5.75, 6.54), P = 0.000; age > 70, RR = 18.23 (95% CI 3.13, 107.34), P = 0.001, mean age, WMD = 1.34 (95% CI 0.34, 2.33), P = 0.009, Table 2). Sex was also associated with delirium in univariable analysis or meta-analysis (female patients, RR = 1.21 (95% CI 1.15, 1.28, Table 2)).
Table 2

Meta-analysis of risk factors for postoperative delirium in older spinal surgical patients

Risk factorStudiesStatistically methodsRR or WMD with 95%CisI2(%)P value
Preoperative
 Age > 65 years2IV, fixed6.13 (5.75, 6.54)0.00.000
 Age > 70 years3IV, random18.23 (3.13, 107.34)48.40.001
 Sex (% female)8IV, fixed1.21 (1.15, 1.28)0.0010.000
 Mean age6IV, fixed1.34 (0.34, 2.33)6.00.009
 Number of medication3IV, random0.92 (− 0.05, 1.88)77.50.063
 Surgical history6IV, fixed2.22 (1.47, 3.34)0.00.000
 Diabetes mellitus7IV, random2.80 (1.15, 6.79)70.60.023
 Cerebral vascular diseases3IV, fixed3.18 (1.27, 7.79)15.70.014
 Low hematocrit (%)3IV, fixed− 1.66 (− 2.94, − 0.38)0.00.011
 Low hemoglobin (g/L)4IV, fixed− 0.41 (− 0.75, − 0.07)0.00.017
 Low albumin (g/dL)2IV, fixed− 0.30 (− 0.50, − 0.11)18.70.003
 Low sodium4IV, random− 1.81 (− 3.33, − 0.30)77.80.019
 Low potassium2IV, random0.00 (− 0.28, 0.28)45.40.996
 Blood sugar2IV, random0.13 (− 0.52, 0.78)33.40.698
 Hypertension7IV, random2.01 (1.04, 3.88)58.30.038
 Depression2IV, fixed2.02 (1.00, 4.06)0.00.049
Intraoperative
 Operating time9IV, random29.42 (1.12, 57.72)87.90.042
 Total blood loss8IV, fixed116.77 (93.66, 139.88)14.90.000
 Fusion level2IV, random0.35 (− 0.72, 1.42)52.30.524
 Intravenous fluids4IV, random231.24 (− 137.99, 600.47)68.90.220
Postoperative data
 Low sodium (mEq/L)4IV, random− 3.05 (− 5.47, − 0.63)89.70.014
 Low hemoglobin (g/L)6IV, random− 0.76 (− 1.24, − 0.29)82.50.002
 Low hematocrit (%)3IV, fixed− 2.53 (− 3.59, − 1.47)0.00.000
 Low albumin (g/dL)2IV, fixed− 0.10 (− 0.27, 0.07)0.00.245
 Fever2IV, fixed4.52 (2.94, 6.95)0.00.000
 Low potassium4IV, random− 3.05 (− 5.47, − 0.63)89.70.014
 Blood sugar1IV, fixed1.00 (1.00, 1.96)0.00.041
 VAS2IV, random0.98 (0.11, 1.85)55.40.027
Meta-analysis of risk factors for postoperative delirium in older spinal surgical patients Surgical history was also a risk factor of delirium (RR = 2.22; 95% CI 1.47, 3.34; Table 2). Diabetes mellitus and hypertension were also risk factors of delirium (RR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.15, 6.79), P = 0.023; RR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.04, 3.88, P = 0.038, Table 2). Low hematocrit, low hemoglobin, low albumin, and low sodium were the risk factors of delirium (P = 0.011, P = 0.017, P = 0.003, and P = 0.019, Table 2). We also found that depression was the risk factor of delirium of patients undergoing spinal surgery (RR = 2.02; 95% CI 1.00, 4.06; P = 0.049; Table 2).

Intraoperative data

For intraoperative data, we revealed that operating time (WMD = 29.42; 95% CI 1.12, 57.72; P = 0.042, Table 2) and total blood loss (WMD = 116.77; 95% CI 93.66, 139.88; P = 0.000; Table 2) were risk factor of delirium.

Postoperative data

Based on the combined RRs or WMDs, we identified the following risk factors: low sodium (WMD = − 3.05; 95% CI − 5.47, − 0.63; P = 0.014; Table 2), low hemoglobin (WMD = − 0.76; 95% CI − 1.24, − 0.29; P = 0.002; Table 2), low hematocrit (WMD = − 2.53; 95% CI − 3.59, − 1.47; P = 0.000; Table 2), fever (WMD = 4.52; 95% CI 2.94, 6.95; P = 0.000; Table 2), low potassium (WMD = − 3.05; 95% CI − 5.47, − 0.63; P = 0.014; Table 2), blood sugar (WMD = 1.00; 95% CI 1.00, 1.96; P = 0.041; Table 2), and VAS (WMD = 0.98; 95% CI 0.11, 1.85, P = 0.027; Table 2).

Discussion

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and investigated risk factors for postoperative delirium in older people undergoing spinal surgery. Results in this meta-analysis suggested the overall prevalence of postoperative delirium was 11.5%. The prevalence of delirium ranged from 3.8 to 40.4% in the included studies. Postoperative delirium was associated with increased duration of hospital stay, readmission rate, and the economic costs. Scholz et al. [22] found that patients with postoperative delirium had a significantly increased duration of hospital stay compared with those without delirium. A better understanding of risk factors for delirium may allow stratification of patients before surgery, enabling targeting of interventions and healthcare resources, for example the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, a proven multidisciplinary intervention that can improve outcomes in patients with postoperative delirium [23]. This meta-analysis demonstrates that twenty-two risk factors: general characteristic: old age, female patients, history of surgery, diabetes mellitus, hypertension; preoperative data: low hematocrit, low hemoglobin, low albumin, low sodium, depression; operative data: operating time, total blood loss; postoperative data: low sodium, low hemoglobin, low hematocrit, low albumin, fever, low potassium, blood sugar, and VAS. One of the most important risk factors was advanced age, especially patient over 70 years old are more likely to experience postoperative delirium than those relatively young. Shi et al. [6] revealed that age > 65 years was the risk factor for delirium. We further analyze that the age > 70 was more likely to subject to delirium. Zhu et al. [24] conducted a meta-analysis and found that old age, age > 70 years, was a risk factor of the major head neck cancer surgery. This may be due to the fact that elderly patients were more likely influenced by age-related physical and psychical changes, such as poor organ compensative capacity, reduced body adaptability, and declined adjustment ability. Watt et al. [25] found that incidence of postoperative delirium was 18.4% in elective surgery. What’s more, they revealed that psychotropic medication use and smoking status were two risk factors for delirium in elective surgery patients. Patients who developed postoperative delirium were more often females. Our results were opposite of previous meta-analysis. Zhu et al. [24] deemed that women could deal with postoperative psychological stress better than male and thus was associated with less delirium. Shi et al. [6] identified female patients were associated with more delirium than male patients. Scholz et al. [22] found that sex was not associated with delirium in univariable analysis or meta-analysis. Current meta-analysis also found that hypotension was the risk factor of delirium after spinal surgery. Scholz et al. [22] found that intraoperative hypotension and perioperative blood transfusion were the risk factors of delirium. Low hemoglobin and low hematocrit may reduce oxygen supply to the brain and thus causing delirium. Marcantonio et al. [26] also suggest that the postoperative levels of hematocrit should be kept at 30% or higher through appropriate transfusion in order to prevent postoperative delirium. Meanwhile, the low preoperative levels of albumin seem to indicate poor nutritional condition before surgery and after surgery, like the case with gastric ulcer as comorbidity [17]. There were several limitations in this meta-analysis: (1) heterogeneity bias within the selected studies. In particular, the review was susceptible to heterogeneity owing to the inclusion of different spinal surgery (cervical spondylosis, spinal scoliosis, and lumbar degenerative disease). (2) Another limitation was that only articles published in English and Chinese were included, yet most of the studies were undertaken in non-English-speaking countries. We also did not include unpublished papers and thus may have selection bias. (3) All studies assessed delirium from 3 to 7 days after surgery. Differences in duration of follow-up may have introduced bias, but the majority used 5 days and consistently demonstrated the highest rate of delirium in the first 3 days.

Conclusion

Delirium not only prolongs the length of hospital stay, but also increases readmission rate and the economic costs. Several risk factors including old age, female patients, history of surgery, diabetes mellitus, low hematocrit, low hemoglobin, low albumin, low sodium, depression; operative data: operating time, total blood loss, low sodium, low hemoglobin, low hematocrit, low albumin, fever, low potassium, blood sugar, and VAS were significant predictors for postoperative delirium after spinal surgery. Early identification of these factors is warranted for improving patient outcomes.
  25 in total

1.  Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Delirium after spinal surgery in Korean population.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Lee; Ye-Soo Park
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Depression as an independent predictor of postoperative delirium in spine deformity patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

Authors:  Aladine A Elsamadicy; Owoicho Adogwa; Emily Lydon; Amanda Sergesketter; Rayan Kaakati; Ankit I Mehta; Raul A Vasquez; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-06-02

4.  [Analysis of risk factors for delirium in the elderly patients after spinal operation].

Authors:  Hong Li; Chun-de Li; Xiao-dong Yi; Hong Liu; Xian-yi Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2012-12-18

5.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

6.  The association of intraoperative factors with the development of postoperative delirium.

Authors:  E R Marcantonio; L Goldman; E J Orav; E F Cook; T H Lee
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  The prevalence of undiagnosed pre-surgical cognitive impairment and its post-surgical clinical impact in elderly patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Emily Lydon; Victoria D Vuong; Joseph Cheng; Isaac O Karikari; Carlos A Bagley
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 8.  Delirium in Older Persons: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Esther S Oh; Tamara G Fong; Tammy T Hshieh; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk Factors for Delirium After Spine Surgery in Extremely Elderly Patients Aged 80 Years or Older and Review of the Literature: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Shiro Imagama; Kei Ando; Naoki Ishiguro; Masaomi Yamashita; Yawara Eguchi; Morio Matsumoto; Ken Ishii; Tomohiro Hikata; Shoji Seki; Hidetomi Terai; Akinobu Suzuki; Koji Tamai; Masaaki Aramomi; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Atsushi Kimura; Hirokazu Inoue; Gen Inoue; Masayuki Miyagi; Wataru Saito; Kei Yamada; Michio Hongo; Yuji Matsuoka; Hidekazu Suzuki; Atsushi Nakano; Kazuyuki Watanabe; Hirotaka Chikuda; Junichi Ohya; Yasuchika Aoki; Masayuki Shimizu; Toshimasa Futatsugi; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Masaichi Hasegawa; Katsuhito Kiyasu; Haku Iizuka; Yoichi Iizuka; Ryoichi Kobayashi; Kotaro Nishida; Kenichiro Kakutani; Hideaki Nakajima; Hideki Murakami; Satoru Demura; Satoshi Kato; Katsuhito Yoshioka; Takashi Namikawa; Kei Watanabe; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Mitsunori Yoshimoto; Hiroyasu Fujiwara; Norihiro Nishida; Yasuaki Imajo; Masashi Yamazaki; Masataka Sakane; Tetsuya Abe; Kengo Fujii; Takashi Kaito; Takeo Furuya; Sumihisa Orita; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-11

10.  Identifying Older Adults at Risk of Delirium Following Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Watt; Andrea C Tricco; Catherine Talbot-Hamon; Ba' Pham; Patricia Rios; Agnes Grudniewicz; Camilla Wong; Douglas Sinclair; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  5 in total

1.  When experiencing a surgery: Gastrointestinal cancer patients' longitudinal trajectories in psychological stress and their association with quality of recovery.

Authors:  Gaorong Lv; Di Zhao; Guopeng Li; Meiling Qi; Xiaoling Dong; Ping Li
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 2.  High-Mobility Group Box-1 and Its Potential Role in Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Saxena; Véronique Kruys; Raf De Jongh; Joseph Vamecq; Mervyn Maze
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Outcomes of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingyu Lin; Xuecui Zhang; Shurong Xu; Yanchun Peng; Sailan Li; Xizhen Huang; Liangwan Chen; Yanjuan Lin
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 4.  Mitigation of perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A holistic approach.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Peter A Goldstein; Lisbeth A Evered
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.702

5.  Preoperative Inflammatory Markers and the Risk of Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Jin Seo Yang; Jae Jun Lee; Young-Suk Kwon; Jong-Ho Kim; Jong-Hee Sohn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.