Literature DB >> 33152784

Chondrogenic Bone Tumors: The Importance of Imaging Characteristics.

Hannes Engel1, Georg W Herget2, Hannah Füllgraf3, Reto Sutter4, Matthias Benndorf1, Fabian Bamberg1, Pia M Jungmann1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chondrogenic tumors are the most frequent primary bone tumors. Malignant chondrogenic tumors represent about one quarter of malignant bone tumors. Benign chondrogenic bone tumors are frequent incidental findings at imaging. Radiological parameters may be helpful for identification, characterization, and differential diagnosis.
METHODS: Systematic PubMed literature research. Identification and review of studies analyzing and describing imaging characteristics of chondrogenic bone tumors. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system differentiates between benign, intermediate (locally aggressive or rarely metastasizing), and malignant chondrogenic tumors. On imaging, typical findings of differentiated chondrogenic tumors are lobulated patterns with a high signal on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ring- and arc-like calcifications on conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT). Depending on the entity, the prevalence of this chondrogenic pattern differs. While high grade tumors may be identified due to aggressive imaging patterns, the differentiation between benign and intermediate grade chondrogenic tumors is challenging, even in an interdisciplinary approach. KEY POINTS: · The WHO defines benign, intermediate, and malignant chondrogenic bone tumors. · Frequent benign tumors: osteochondroma and enchondroma; Frequent malignant tumor: conventional chondrosarcoma. · Differentiation between enchondroma versus low-grade chondrosarcoma is challenging for radiologists and pathologists. · Pain, deep scalloping, cortical destruction, bone expansion, soft tissue component: favor chondrosarcoma. · Potential malignant transformation of osteochondroma: progression after skeletal maturity, cartilage cap thickness (> 2 cm adult; > 3 cm child). · Potentially helpful advanced imaging methods: Dynamic MRI, texture analysis, FDG-PET/CT. CITATION FORMAT: · Engel H, Herget GW, Füllgraf H et al. Chondrogenic Bone Tumors: The Importance of Imaging Characteristics. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 262 - 274. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33152784     DOI: 10.1055/a-1288-1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  4 in total

1.  Surgical Strategies and Outcomes for Intracranial Chondromas: A Retrospective Study of 17 Cases and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hongyuan Liu; Qing Cai; Junting Li; Yafei Xue; Yunze Zhang; Zongping Li; Tianzhi Zhao; Yingxi Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Imaging features of cartilaginous tumors of the head and neck.

Authors:  Pattana Wangaryattawanich; Mohit Agarwal; Tanya Rath
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2021-12-04

3.  Diagnostic Value of CT- and MRI-Based Texture Analysis and Imaging Findings for Grading Cartilaginous Tumors in Long Bones.

Authors:  Xue-Ying Deng; Hai-Yan Chen; Jie-Ni Yu; Xiu-Liang Zhu; Jie-Yu Chen; Guo-Liang Shao; Ri-Sheng Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Primary extraosseous dural chondrosarcoma: a case report.

Authors:  Francis Garay Buitron; Albert Pons-Escoda; Noemí Vidal; Alberto Torres; Angels Camins
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.474

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.