Literature DB >> 33152541

Safety and Efficacy of Cold Snare Polypectomy Without Submucosal Injection for Large Sessile Serrated Lesions: A Prospective Study.

Yoshiaki Kimoto1, Eiji Sakai2, Rin Inamoto1, Marie Kurebayashi1, Syunya Takayanagi1, Tomoya Hirata3, Yuichiro Suzuki1, Rindo Ishii1, Takafumi Konishi4, Keisuke Kanda5, Ryoju Negishi1, Maiko Takita1, Kohei Ono1, Yohei Minato1, Takashi Muramoto1, Ken Ohata6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become the standard resection method for small colorectal polyps (<10 mm). Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) have low prevalence of advanced histology irrespective of size, and thus could be amenable to CSP. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of CSP for SSLs ≥10 mm.
METHODS: Between November 2018 and January 2020, we prospectively enrolled 300 consecutive patients who underwent CSP for 474 SSLs ≥10 mm. To delineate SSL borders, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy and/or image-enhanced endoscopy was conducted. Piecemeal CSP (pCSP) was performed in cases where en-bloc resection was difficult. Biopsy specimens were obtained from the margins of the post-polypectomy defect to confirm complete resection. Surveillance colonoscopy was performed to screen for local recurrence.
RESULTS: All lesions were successfully resected using CSP without submucosal injection. The median diameter of the resected lesions was 14 mm, and pCSP was used to resect 106 (22%) lesions. Post-polypectomy biopsies revealed residual serrated tissue in only one case (0.2%). Adverse events included immediate bleeding in 8 (3%) patients; no delayed bleeding events occurred, irrespective of the use of antithrombotic drugs. During a 7-month median follow-up period, surveillance colonoscopies were performed for 384 lesions (81%), and no local recurrences were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: CSP without submucosal injection is a safe and effective treatment for SSLs ≥10 mm. UMIN Clinical Trials, Number: UMIN000034763.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal Cancer; Endoscopic Treatment; Piecemeal Resection

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33152541     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  5 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of underwater cold snare resection without submucosal injection of large non-pedunculated colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Andrew W Yen; Joseph W Leung; Malcom Koo; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 2.  Minimally Invasive Endoscopic and Surgical Management of Rectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Sarah S Al Ghamdi; Ira Leeds; Sandy Fang; Saowanee Ngamruengphong
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Recurrence rates after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carola Rotermund; Roupen Djinbachian; Mahsa Taghiakbari; Markus D Enderle; Axel Eickhoff; Daniel von Renteln
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 5.374

4.  Letter to editor: piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions.

Authors:  Haiying Guan; Chunyan Zeng; Youxiang Chen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Cold versus hot polypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection-A review of current evidence.

Authors:  Raquel Ortigão; Jochen Weigt; Ahmed Afifi; Diogo Libânio
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.