Elena Rosselli Del Turco1, Michele Bartoletti1, Anders Dahl2, Carlos Cervera3, Juan M Pericàs4. 1. Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 2. Department of Cardiology Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 4. Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute for Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: jpericas@clinic.cat.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterococcal bacteraemia (EB) is common, particularly in the nosocomial setting, and its management poses a challenge for clinicians and microbiologists. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to summarize the more relevant features of EB and to provide a practical state-of-the-art on the topics that more directly affect its management. SOURCES: Pubmed articles from inception to 31 May 2020. CONTENT: The following topics are covered: epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics and factors associated with prognosis of EB; diagnosis and work-up, including the use of echocardiography to rule out endocarditis; antibiotic management with special focus on antimicrobial resistance and complicated EB; and the role of infectious disease consultation and the use of bundles in EB. In addition, three clinical vignettes are presented to illustrate the practical application of the guidance provided, and major gaps in the current evidence supporting EB management are discussed. IMPLICATIONS: EB is associated with large burdens of morbidity and mortality, particularly among fragile and immunosuppressed patients presenting complicated bacteraemia due to multidrug-resistant enterococci. Most cases of EB are caused by Enterococcus faecalis, followed by E. faecium. EB often presents as polymicrobial bacteraemia. Rapidly identifying patients at risk of EB is crucial for timely application of diagnostic techniques and empiric therapy. Early alert systems and rapid diagnostic techniques, such as matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, especially if used together with infectious disease consultation within bundles, appear to improve management and prognosis of EB. Echocardiography is also key in the work-up of EB and should probably be more extensively used, although its exact indications in EB are still debated. Multidisciplinary approaches are warranted due to the complexity and severity of EB.
BACKGROUND:Enterococcal bacteraemia (EB) is common, particularly in the nosocomial setting, and its management poses a challenge for clinicians and microbiologists. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to summarize the more relevant features of EB and to provide a practical state-of-the-art on the topics that more directly affect its management. SOURCES: Pubmed articles from inception to 31 May 2020. CONTENT: The following topics are covered: epidemiological, clinical and microbiological characteristics and factors associated with prognosis of EB; diagnosis and work-up, including the use of echocardiography to rule out endocarditis; antibiotic management with special focus on antimicrobial resistance and complicated EB; and the role of infectious disease consultation and the use of bundles in EB. In addition, three clinical vignettes are presented to illustrate the practical application of the guidance provided, and major gaps in the current evidence supporting EB management are discussed. IMPLICATIONS: EB is associated with large burdens of morbidity and mortality, particularly among fragile and immunosuppressed patients presenting complicated bacteraemia due to multidrug-resistant enterococci. Most cases of EB are caused by Enterococcus faecalis, followed by E. faecium. EB often presents as polymicrobial bacteraemia. Rapidly identifying patients at risk of EB is crucial for timely application of diagnostic techniques and empiric therapy. Early alert systems and rapid diagnostic techniques, such as matrix-assisted desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, especially if used together with infectious disease consultation within bundles, appear to improve management and prognosis of EB. Echocardiography is also key in the work-up of EB and should probably be more extensively used, although its exact indications in EB are still debated. Multidisciplinary approaches are warranted due to the complexity and severity of EB.
Authors: Marco Mussa; Pedro María Martínez Pérez-Crespo; Luis Eduardo Lopez-Cortes; Pilar Retamar-Gentil; Adrián Sousa-Dominguez; Ane Josune Goikoetxea-Aguirre; José María Reguera-Iglesias; Eva León Jiménez; Isabel Fernández-Natal; Carlos Armiñanzas-Castillo; Lucía Boix-Palop; Jordi Cuquet-Pedragosa; Miguel Ángel Morán Rodríguez; Jonathan Fernandez-Suarez; Alfonso Del Arco-Jiménez; Alfredo Jóver-Saenz; Alberto Bahamonde-Carrasco; Fátima Galan-Sanchez; Juan Manuel Sánchez-Calvo; Alejandro Smithson-Amat; David Vinuesa-García; Antonio Sánchez-Porto; Inmaculada López-Hernández; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño Journal: Microbiol Spectr Date: 2022-06-30