Literature DB >> 33152394

Rational design of adjuvants for subunit vaccines: The format of cationic adjuvants affects the induction of antigen-specific antibody responses.

Giulia Anderluzzi1, Signe Tandrup Schmidt2, Robert Cunliffe1, Stuart Woods3, Craig W Roberts3, Daniele Veggi4, Ilaria Ferlenghi4, Derek T O'Hagan5, Barbara C Baudner4, Yvonne Perrie6.   

Abstract

A range of cationic delivery systems have been investigated as vaccine adjuvants, though few direct comparisons exist. To investigate the impact of the delivery platform, we prepared four cationic systems (emulsions, liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles and solid lipid nanoparticles) all containing equal concentrations of the cationic lipid dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide in combination with the Neisseria adhesin A variant 3 subunit antigen. The formulations were physicochemically characterized and their ability to associate with cells and promote antigen processing (based on degradation of DQ-OVA, a substrate for proteases which upon hydrolysis is fluorescent) was compared in vitro and their vaccine efficacy (antigen-specific antibody responses and IFN-γ production) and biodistribution (antigen and adjuvant) were evaluated in vivo. Due to their cationic nature, all delivery systems gave high antigen loading (> 85%) with liposomes, lipid nanoparticles and emulsions being <200 nm, whilst polymeric nanoparticles were larger (~350 nm). In vitro, the particulate systems tended to promote cell uptake and antigen processing, whilst emulsions were less effective. Similarly, whilst the particulate delivery systems induced a depot (of both delivery system and antigen) at the injection site, the cationic emulsions did not. However, out of the systems tested the cationic emulsions induced the highest antibody responses. These results demonstrate that while cationic lipids can have strong adjuvant activity, their formulation platform influences their immunogenicity.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody response; Antigen processing; Cationic delivery systems; Pharmacokinetics; Protein subunit; Vaccine adjuvant

Year:  2020        PMID: 33152394     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  3 in total

Review 1.  Lipid-Based Nanoparticles in the Clinic and Clinical Trials: From Cancer Nanomedicine to COVID-19 Vaccines.

Authors:  Thai Thanh Hoang Thi; Estelle J A Suys; Jung Seok Lee; Dai Hai Nguyen; Ki Dong Park; Nghia P Truong
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-08

2.  The role of nanoparticle format and route of administration on self-amplifying mRNA vaccine potency.

Authors:  Giulia Anderluzzi; Gustavo Lou; Stuart Woods; Signe Tandrup Schmidt; Simona Gallorini; Michela Brazzoli; Russell Johnson; Craig W Roberts; Derek T O'Hagan; Barbara C Baudner; Yvonne Perrie
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Mimicking Pathogens to Augment the Potency of Liposomal Cancer Vaccines.

Authors:  Maarten K Nijen Twilhaar; Lucas Czentner; Cornelus F van Nostrum; Gert Storm; Joke M M den Haan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.321

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.