Xinyuan Li1, Yaoqin Mu1, Nagwa Elshewy1, Ding Ding2, Huijuan Zou2, Beili Chen2, Change Chen2, Zhaolian Wei2, Yunxia Cao2, Ping Zhou3, Zhiguo Zhang4. 1. Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, Anhui, China; NHC Key Laboratory of study on abnormal gametes and reproductive tract (Anhui Medical University), No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China; Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle (Anhui Medical University), Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China. 2. Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, Anhui, China; Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Genetics, No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China; Biopreservation and Artificial Organs, Anhui Provincial Engineering Research Center, Anhui Medical University, No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China. 3. Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, Anhui, China; NHC Key Laboratory of study on abnormal gametes and reproductive tract (Anhui Medical University), No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China; Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle (Anhui Medical University), Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China. Electronic address: zhoup_325@aliyun.com. 4. Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, Anhui, China; NHC Key Laboratory of study on abnormal gametes and reproductive tract (Anhui Medical University), No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China; Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle (Anhui Medical University), Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, No 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China. Electronic address: zzg_100@163.com.
Abstract
AIM: To compare embryonic developmental competence and clinical outcomes of oocytes matured in vivo (IVF oocytes) and those matured in vitro (IVM oocytes) from the same IVM/IVF cycles, and to analyze the clinical efficiency of a melatonin-supplemented in vitro maturation system combined with a modified IVM/IVF protocol. MAIN METHODS: We randomly recruited 22 patients undergoing IVM/IVF treatment protocol in our medical centre. The fertilization, cleavage and blastocyst formation rates, as well as clinical pregnancy, implantation and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates were analysed and compared between IVF and IVM oocytes. We evaluated mitochondrial function indicators by fluorescence staining and confocal microscopy, including mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species and calcium (Ca2+) levels in 15 IVF and 15 IVM oocytes. KEY FINDINGS: There were no significant differences in fertilization or blastocyst formation rates between the IVF and IVM groups, whereas the cleavage rate was significantly higher in the IVF versus IVM group (100% vs 93.4 ± 10.9%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy, implantation or live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups. The cumulative clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate per pick-up oocyte in the IVM/IVF treatment cycles were 68.2% (15/22) and 54.5% (12/22), respectively. The reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ levels were significantly increased, and mitochondrial membrane potential was significantly decreased, in IVM compared with IVF oocytes. SIGNIFICANCE: The modified IVM/IVF protocol can be effectively applied to the treatment of some indicated patients and achieve ideal clinical outcomes, even though the developmental potential of IVM oocytes may not be as high as IVF oocytes.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To compare embryonic developmental competence and clinical outcomes of oocytes matured in vivo (IVF oocytes) and those matured in vitro (IVM oocytes) from the same IVM/IVF cycles, and to analyze the clinical efficiency of a melatonin-supplemented in vitro maturation system combined with a modified IVM/IVF protocol. MAIN METHODS: We randomly recruited 22 patients undergoing IVM/IVF treatment protocol in our medical centre. The fertilization, cleavage and blastocyst formation rates, as well as clinical pregnancy, implantation and live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates were analysed and compared between IVF and IVM oocytes. We evaluated mitochondrial function indicators by fluorescence staining and confocal microscopy, including mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species and calcium (Ca2+) levels in 15 IVF and 15 IVM oocytes. KEY FINDINGS: There were no significant differences in fertilization or blastocyst formation rates between the IVF and IVM groups, whereas the cleavage rate was significantly higher in the IVF versus IVM group (100% vs 93.4 ± 10.9%, p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy, implantation or live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates between the two groups. The cumulative clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate per pick-up oocyte in the IVM/IVF treatment cycles were 68.2% (15/22) and 54.5% (12/22), respectively. The reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ levels were significantly increased, and mitochondrial membrane potential was significantly decreased, in IVM compared with IVF oocytes. SIGNIFICANCE: The modified IVM/IVF protocol can be effectively applied to the treatment of some indicated patients and achieve ideal clinical outcomes, even though the developmental potential of IVM oocytes may not be as high as IVF oocytes.