Literature DB >> 33152332

Guidelines for analysis of low-frequency antigen-specific T cell results: Dye-based proliferation assay vs 3H-thymidine incorporation.

Daniela Di Blasi1, Iris Claessen2, Annelies W Turksma3, Josine van Beek4, Anja Ten Brinke5.   

Abstract

It is generally recognized that dysregulation of the immune system plays a critical role in many diseases, including autoimmune diseases and cancer. T cells play a crucial role in maintaining self-tolerance, while loss of immune tolerance and T cell activation can lead to severe inflammation and tissue damage. T cell responses have a key role in the effectiveness of vaccination strategies and immunomodulating therapies. Immunomonitoring methods have the ability to elucidate immunological processes, monitor the development of disease and assess therapeutic effects. In this respect, it is of particular interest to evaluate antigen (Ag)-specific T cells by determining their frequency, type and functionality in cellular assays. Nevertheless, Ag-specific T cells are detected infrequently in most diseases using current techniques. Many efforts have been made to develop more sensitive, reproducible, and reliable methods for Ag-specific T cell detection. It has been found that analysis of cellular proliferation can be a useful tool to determine the presence and frequency of Ag-specific T cell and to provides insight into modulation of the T cell response by a specific antigen or therapy. However, the selection of a cut-off value for a positive response and therefore a more accurate interpretation of the data, continues to be a major concern. Here, we provide guidelines to select a proper cut-off for monitoring of Ag-specific CD4+ T cell responses. In vitro Ag-stimulation has been assessed with two methods; a dye-based proliferation assay and 3H-thymidine-based assay. Two cut-off approaches are compared; mean and variance of control wells, and the stimulation index. By evaluating the proliferative response to the in vitro Ag-stimulation using these two methods, we demonstrate the importance of taking into consideration the variability of the control wells to distinguish a positive from a false positive response.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ag-specific T cells; Autoimmunity; CD4(+) T cells; Immunomonitoring; Mean + SD; Stimulation index

Year:  2020        PMID: 33152332     DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2020.112907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  3 in total

Review 1.  Vaccine-Induced Cellular Immunity against Bordetella pertussis: Harnessing Lessons from Animal and Human Studies to Improve Design and Testing of Novel Pertussis Vaccines.

Authors:  Anja Saso; Beate Kampmann; Sophie Roetynck
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-07

2.  COVID-19 infection and vaccination in immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Eva Piano Mortari; Federica Pulvirenti
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.732

3.  Detection of rare autoreactive T cell subsets in patients with pemphigus vulgaris.

Authors:  Alexandra Polakova; Leonie Kauter; Adina Ismagambetova; Dario Didona; Farzan Solimani; Kamran Ghoreschi; Michael Hertl; Christian Möbs; Christoph Hudemann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 8.786

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.