Literature DB >> 33151525

Non-invasive Embryo Assessment: Altered Individual Protein Profile in Spent Culture Media from Embryos Transferred at Day 5.

Alexander Freis1,2, Sabine Roesner3, Anne Marshall3, Julia Rehnitz3, Kyra von Horn3, Edison Capp3,4, Jens Erik Dietrich3, Thomas Strowitzki3, Ariane Germeyer3.   

Abstract

In order to improve ART outcome, non-invasive embryo assessment is gaining more and more attention. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the consecutive implantation potential via the secretome between blastocysts with or without implantation and to analyse possible interactions between these differentially expressed proteins. In this prospective study, 69 spent culture media from blastocysts transferred at day 5 were collected from patients undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment in a single IVF centre between April 2015 and November 2018 after informed consent and analysed individually. Exclusion criteria were the absence of informed consent, PCOS, endometriosis and maternal age > 42 years. Dependent on the treatment outcome, media were subsequently divided into two groups: from embryos who implanted successfully (n = 37) and from embryos without implantation (n = 32). Ninety-two proteins were measured simultaneously using the proximity extension assay (PEA) technology with the Olink® CVD III panel employing oligonucleotide-labelled antibodies. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. Media from implanted blastocysts showed significantly higher expression of EPHB4, ALCAM, CSTB, BMH, TIMP4, CCL24, SELE, FAS, JAM-A, PON3, PDGF-A, vWF and PECAM-1 compared with media from blastocysts without subsequent implantation. The highest relative expression change could be demonstrated for PECAM-1 and TIMP4. PECAM-1, SELE and vWF were co-expressed. Especially EPHB 4, SELE, ALCAM, MCP-1, CCL24, FAS, JAM-A and PDGF-A have already been described in early embryonic development and metabolism. Therefore, these proteins together with PECAM-1 indicate possible biomarkers for non-invasive embryo assessment in the future. However, due to the innovative methodology, defining a threshold for the use as biomarkers remains to be assessed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst; IVF/ICSI; Implantation; Non-invasive embryo assessment; Proximity extension assay; Secretome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33151525     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00362-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  48 in total

Review 1.  New approaches to embryo selection.

Authors:  Markus Montag; Bettina Toth; Thomas Strowitzki
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Developmental kinetics of cleavage stage mouse embryos are related to their subsequent carbohydrate and amino acid utilization at the blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Y S L Lee; G A Thouas; D K Gardner
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  The science of implantation emerges blinking into the light.

Authors:  Andrew M Sharkey; Nick S Macklon
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 4.  Regulation of embryonic implantation.

Authors:  Jan-S Krüssel; Peter Bielfeld; Mary Lake Polan; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  No evidence of association of MUC-1 genetic polymorphism with embryo implantation failure.

Authors:  D B Dentillo; F R P Souza; J Meola; G S Vieira; M E H D Yazlle; L R Goulart; L Martelli
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  Comparative protein-profile analysis of implanted versus non-implanted human blastocysts.

Authors:  Francisco Domínguez; Blanca Gadea; Francisco J Esteban; Jose Antonio Horcajadas; Antonio Pellicer; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Differential expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor mRNAs in the mouse uterus around the time of implantation.

Authors:  I Chakraborty; S K Das; S K Dey
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability.

Authors:  Erika Assarsson; Martin Lundberg; Göran Holmquist; Johan Björkesten; Stine Bucht Thorsen; Daniel Ekman; Anna Eriksson; Emma Rennel Dickens; Sandra Ohlsson; Gabriella Edfeldt; Ann-Catrin Andersson; Patrik Lindstedt; Jan Stenvang; Mats Gullberg; Simon Fredriksson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Polymorphism of genes and implantation failure.

Authors:  Majid Mojarrad; Mohammad Hassanzadeh-Nazarabadi; Niaiesh Tafazoli
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2013

10.  Differences in secretome in culture media when comparing blastocysts and arrested embryos using multiplex proximity assay.

Authors:  Karin E Lindgren; Fatma Gülen Yaldir; Julius Hreinsson; Jan Holte; Karin Kårehed; Inger Sundström-Poromaa; Helena Kaihola; Helena Åkerud
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.384

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neutrophil depletion in the pre-implantation phase impairs pregnancy index, placenta and fetus development.

Authors:  Cristina Bichels Hebeda; Anna Carolina Savioli; Pablo Scharf; Marina de Paula-Silva; Cristiane Damas Gil; Sandra Helena Poliselli Farsky; Silvana Sandri
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 2.  Current Advancements in Noninvasive Profiling of the Embryo Culture Media Secretome.

Authors:  Raminta Zmuidinaite; Fady I Sharara; Ray K Iles
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.