| Literature DB >> 33151139 |
Maxim Prokchorchik1, Ankita Pandey1, Hayoung Moon1, Wanhui Kim2,3, Hyelim Jeon4,2, Gayoung Jung1, Jay Jayaraman5, Stephen Poole6, Cécile Segonzac2,4,3, Kee Hoon Sohn7,1, Honour C McCann8,9.
Abstract
Bacterial wilt caused by the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (RSSC) threatens the cultivation of important crops worldwide. We sequenced 30 RSSC phylotype I (R. pseudosolanacearum) strains isolated from pepper (Capsicum annuum) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) across the Republic of Korea. These isolates span the diversity of phylotype I, have extensive effector repertoires and are subject to frequent recombination. Recombination hotspots among South Korean phylotype I isolates include multiple predicted contact-dependent inhibition loci, suggesting that microbial competition plays a significant role in Ralstonia evolution. Rapid diversification of secreted effectors presents challenges for the development of disease-resistant plant varieties. We identified potential targets for disease resistance breeding by testing for allele-specific host recognition of T3Es present among South Korean phyloype I isolates. The integration of pathogen population genomics and molecular plant pathology contributes to the development of location-specific disease control and development of plant cultivars with durable resistance to relevant threats.Entities:
Keywords: Ralstonia solanacearum; microbial competition; pathogen evolution; plant–microbe interactions; population genomics
Year: 2020 PMID: 33151139 PMCID: PMC7725338 DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Genom ISSN: 2057-5858
phylotype I isolates and assembly statistics
|
Strain |
Year |
Location of isolation |
Host of isolation |
Assembly length (bp) |
Scaffolds† |
Longest scaffold |
N50 |
Coverage |
Accession |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pe_1* |
2000 |
Chungnam Seosan, Republic of Korea |
|
5 839 983 |
5 |
3 681 740 |
3 681 758 |
306 |
WSNR |
|
Pe_2 |
2000 |
Chungbuk Cheongwon, Republic of Korea |
|
5 600 524 |
213 |
254 641 |
85 236 |
289 |
WSYW |
|
Pe_3* |
2001 |
Chungbuk Chungju, Republic of Korea |
|
5 938 020 |
3 |
3 851 714 |
3 851 698 |
500 |
WSYS |
|
Pe_4 |
2001 |
Jeju Bukjeju, Republic of Korea |
|
5 593 270 |
203 |
317 826 |
77 130 |
247 |
WSYZ |
|
Pe_9 |
2002 |
Chungnam Cheongyang, Republic of Korea |
|
5 723 071 |
278 |
233 723 |
78 017 |
240 |
WSYY |
|
Pe_13 |
2002 |
Jeonbuk Imsil, Republic of Korea |
|
5 865 496 |
248 |
214 411 |
77 725 |
208 |
WSYX |
|
Pe_15 |
2002 |
Jeonbuk Imsil, Republic of Korea |
|
6 033 637 |
237 |
329 719 |
73 852 |
291 |
WSZA |
|
Pe_18 |
2002 |
Jeonnam Haenam, Republic of Korea |
|
6 029 178 |
254 |
241 872 |
83 596 |
261 |
JAABKA |
|
Pe_24 |
2002 |
Chungnam Gongju, Republic of Korea |
|
5 917 705 |
253 |
421 926 |
85 211 |
319 |
JAABJZ |
|
Pe_26 |
2003 |
Chungnam Seosan, Republic of Korea |
|
5 747 672 |
200 |
235 891 |
77 520 |
286 |
JAABJY |
|
Pe_27* |
2003 |
Chungbuk Cheongwon, Republic of Korea |
|
5 853 871 |
9 |
1 965 711 |
1 655 033 |
450 |
WSYT |
|
Pe_28 |
1999 |
Gyeonggi Hwaseong, Republic of Korea |
|
5 830 258 |
247 |
236 369 |
74 138 |
243 |
JAABJX |
|
Pe_30 |
2005 |
Jeonbuk Imsil, Republic of Korea |
|
5 894 388 |
227 |
246 051 |
83 264 |
271 |
JAABJW |
|
Pe_39* |
2005 |
Jeonbuk Jeongeup, Republic of Korea |
|
5 919856 |
4 |
3 808 376 |
3 808 376 |
490 |
WSYU |
|
Pe_42 |
2005 |
Jeonnam Naju, Republic of Korea |
|
5 788 311 |
272 |
170 277 |
74 548 |
281 |
JAABJV |
|
Pe_45 |
2005 |
Chungnam Gongju, Republic of Korea |
|
5 702 018 |
211 |
317 902 |
72 734 |
246 |
JAABJU |
|
Pe_49 |
2005 |
Chungnam Cheongyang, Republic of Korea |
|
5 645 699 |
223 |
241 872 |
73 220 |
300 |
JAABJT |
|
Pe_51 |
2005 |
Chungnam Taean, Republic of Korea |
|
5 722 228 |
229 |
406 488 |
86 970 |
285 |
JAABJS |
|
Pe_52 |
2005 |
Chungbuk Goesan, Republic of Korea |
|
5 688 143 |
240 |
205 520 |
78 443 |
250 |
JAABJR |
|
Pe_56 |
2005 |
Chungbuk Eumseong, Republic of Korea |
|
5 642 649 |
225 |
292 052 |
86 052 |
258 |
JAABJQ |
|
Pe_57* |
2005 |
Gyeongbuk Cheongsong, Republic of Korea |
|
5 720 795 |
2 |
3 754 354 |
3 754 354 |
490 |
WSYV |
|
Pe_61 |
2005 |
Chungbuk Goesan, Republic of Korea |
|
5 719 158 |
246 |
269 792 |
82 771 |
247 |
JAABJP |
|
To_1 |
2008 |
Gangwon Hoengseong, Republic of Korea |
|
5 878 275 |
235 |
216 471 |
84 441 |
245 |
JAABJO |
|
To_7 |
2008 |
Gangwon Hwacheon, Republic of Korea |
|
5 666 531 |
228 |
269 904 |
78 595 |
215 |
JAABJN |
|
To_22 |
2008 |
Gangwon Cheorwon, Republic of Korea |
|
5 357 968 |
223 |
323 913 |
62 467 |
232 |
JAABJM |
|
To_28 |
2008 |
Gangwon Yanggu, Republic of Korea |
|
5 656 151 |
235 |
275 581 |
69 771 |
245 |
JAABJL |
|
To_36 |
2008 |
Gangwon Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea |
|
5 785 858 |
252 |
213 926 |
79 781 |
238 |
JAABJK |
|
To_42 |
2008 |
Gangwon Chuncheon, Republic of Korea |
|
5 811 979 |
306 |
214411 |
61 263 |
112 |
JAABJJ |
|
To_53 |
2008 |
Gangwon Hongcheon, Republic of Korea |
|
5 357 324 |
231 |
297 172 |
54 396 |
226 |
JAABJI |
|
To_63 |
2008 |
Gyeongbuk Bonghwa, Republic of Korea |
|
5 612 635 |
208 |
210 182 |
82 829 |
203 |
JAABJH |
*Hybrid assemblies.
†Contigs shorter than 500 bp not included.
Fig. 1.Diversity and distribution of South Korean phylotype I isolates. (a) Non-recombinant core chromosomal tree and (b) non-recombinant core megaplasmid tree of phylotype I strains isolated from tomato (To) and pepper (Pe) hosts across the Republic of Korea (c). Core alignments were generated by readmapping to separate Pe_57 reference replicons. Phylogenetic trees were built with RAxML v7.2.8 and visualized using FigTree v1.4.3, only displaying branches with a bootstrap support score above 70. Node labels indicate bootstrap support.
Impact of recombination on South Korean phylotype I isolates
|
Alignment length* (bp) |
Variable sites |
Recombinant sites |
R/theta† |
1/delta |
delta (bp)‡ |
nu§ |
r/m|| | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chromosome |
1 129 045 |
4260 |
2 026 835 (64.2 %) |
0.805 |
0.0013 |
758 |
0.007 |
4.30 |
|
Megaplasmid |
186 600 |
614 |
1 511 546 (89.0 %) |
0.863 |
0.0010 |
1025 |
0.006 |
5.40 |
*Gap-free nonrecombinant alignment length.
†Rate of recombination/mutation.
‡Average length of recombinant regions.
§Average relative divergence of recombinant sequence.
||Relative effect of recombination to mutation.
Fig. 2.Recombination in South Korean phylotype I isolates. Recombination events identified by ClonalFrameML in chromosomal (a) and megaplasmid (b) sequences of South Korean strains. Ancestral recombination events are shown in grey, and recent/strain-specific recombination events are shown in red. Sum of strain-specific events shown at the top of each panel. Genes with two or more strain-specific events have gene IDs listed (hypothetical proteins not listed).
Fig. 3.Phylogeny and type III secreted effector repertoires of the species complex. (a) Maximum-likelihood tree inferred using a non-recombinant core gene alignment of single-copy orthologues. Species and phylotype designation shown above and below branches, respectively. Nodes with bootstrap support values under 70 collapsed. Primary (1°) and secondary (2°) cluster assignment by hierBAPS shown next to strain labels. (b) Type III effector repertoires. Top row displays the normalized Robinson–Fould distance between the effector family gene tree and the core gene tree shown on the left. Lower values (e.g. blue) indicate greater topological similarity between the effector and core gene trees.
Fig. 4.Effector alleles of RipA1 and RipAA display variable recognition responses in N. benthamiana. Effector alleles were classified into groups (a) based on amino acid sequence alignments. Representatives of each group in RipA1 [(b), top panel] and RipAA [(c), top panel] were tested for their ability to trigger programmed cell death [(b, c), middle panels] and increased ion leakage [(b, c), bottom panels], markers of host recognition. strains expressing allelic variants were infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves at OD600 0.4 and infiltration sites were photographed 3 days post-infection (p.i.). Asterisks in [(b, c), middle panels) indicate absence of programmed cell death (PCD) for RipA1 allele groups 2 and 4, and RipAA group 2. GFP is a negative control and Pto+AvrPto, GMI1000 RipA1 and BS4048 RipAA refer to positive controls. Ion leakage in [(b, c), bottom panels] was measured at 0, 1, 2 and 3 days p.i. and plotted as the average conductivity of four technical replicates. Error bars represent the standard error of mean (sem).