Literature DB >> 33150845

Association between in-line filtration and Type I hypersensitivity reactions in pediatric oncology patients receiving intravenous etoposide.

Rebecca Ronsley1, Lisa Jacques1, James E Potts1, Kerri Clement1, David B Dix1, Paula Mahon1,2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe hypersensitivity reactions with and without the use of in-line filters during intravenous etoposide therapy in pediatric oncology patients. This was a retrospective review of all patients treated in the Division of Oncology/Hematology/Bone Marrow Transplant at British Columbia Children's Hospital with intravenous etoposide between December 1, 2013 and February 1, 2018. Hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis associated with etoposide infusions were compared over time, including 12 months prior to, 27 months during the use of, and for 12 months after the discontinuation of in-line filtration. There were 192 patients (median age 6.0 (IQR 2.8-13.0) years treated with etoposide and 486 etoposide infusions including 137 (28%) before, 261 (54%) during and 88 (18%) after use of in-line filters at our center. Twenty-six of 486 (5%) and 13/486 (3%) of infusions resulted in a type I hypersensitivity reaction and anaphylaxis, respectively. There were 2/137 (1%), 36/261 (14%) and 1/88 (1%) infusion reactions prior to, during and after in-line filter use, respectively. Infusion reactions during the in-line filter period were higher than during the pre-filter (Z = 3.978; p < 0.001) and post-filter (Z = 3.335; p < 0.001) periods of the study. These data suggest that the use of in-line filtration may be associated with increased frequency of hypersensitivity reactions to etoposide in pediatric cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaphylaxis; etoposide; hypersensitivity; pediatric

Year:  2020        PMID: 33150845     DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2020.1838011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0888-0018            Impact factor:   1.969


  2 in total

1.  Effects of etoposide combined with cisplatin on prognosis of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who failed castration treatment.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Huaiwei Zhang; Zhou Sun; Xiangdi Meng; Zhaosen Ma; Zhixin Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Risks and mitigation strategies to prevent etoposide infusion-related reactions in children.

Authors:  Emma M Tillman; Sarah L Suppes; Nicholas Miles; Ashley M Duty; Kelsey L Kelley; Jennifer L Goldman
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.705

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.