Literature DB >> 33150278

The Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT): A New Tool for Assessing Resident Competence in the Emergency Department.

Warren J Cheung1, Timothy J Wood2, Wade Gofton3, Sebastian Dewhirst1, Nancy Dudek4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The outcome of emergency medicine (EM) training is to produce physicians who can competently run an emergency department (ED) shift. However, there are few tools with supporting validity evidence specifically designed to assess multiple key competencies across an entire shift. The investigators developed and gathered validity evidence for a novel entrustment-based tool to assess a resident's ability to safely run an ED shift.
METHODS: Through a nominal group technique, local and national stakeholders identified dimensions of performance that are reflective of a competent ED physician and are required to safely manage an ED shift. These were included as items in the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT), and each item was scored using an entrustment-based rating scale. The tool was implemented in 2018 at the University of Ottawa Department of Emergency Medicine, and quantitative data and qualitative feedback were collected over 6 months.
RESULTS: A total of 1,141 forms were completed by 78 physicians for 45 residents. An analysis of variance demonstrated an effect of training level with statistically significant increases in mean O-EDShOT scores with each subsequent postgraduate year (p < 0.001). Scores did not vary by ED treatment area. Residents rated as able to safely run the shift had significantly higher mean ± SD scores (4.8 ± 0.3) than those rated as not able (3.8 ± 0.6; p < 0.001). Faculty and residents reported that the tool was feasible to use and facilitated actionable feedback aimed at progression toward independent practice.
CONCLUSIONS: The O-EDShOT successfully discriminated between trainees of different levels regardless of ED treatment area. Multiple sources of validity evidence support the O-EDShOT as a tool to assess a resident's ability to safely run an ED shift. It can serve as a stimulus for daily observation and feedback making it practical to use within an EM residency program.
© 2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33150278      PMCID: PMC7592826          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  30 in total

1.  Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies.

Authors:  Carol Carraccio; Susan D Wolfsthal; Robert Englander; Kevin Ferentz; Christine Martin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data.

Authors:  Steven M Downing
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 3.  Entrustability Scales: Outlining Their Usefulness for Competency-Based Clinical Assessment.

Authors:  Janelle Rekman; Wade Gofton; Nancy Dudek; Tyson Gofton; Stanley J Hamstra
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Is a Single-Item Operative Performance Rating Sufficient?

Authors:  Reed G Williams; Steven Verhulst; John D Mellinger; Gary L Dunnington
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Development and Validation of a Bronchoscopy Competence Assessment Tool in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Nha Voduc; Nancy Dudek; Christopher M Parker; Krishna B Sharma; Timothy J Wood
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-04

Review 6.  Assessing competence in emergency medicine trainees: an overview of effective methodologies.

Authors:  Jonathan Sherbino; Glen Bandiera; Jason R Frank
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.410

7.  Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports.

Authors:  Nancy L Dudek; Meridith B Marks; Timothy J Wood; A Curtis Lee
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Comparison of the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE) to a Single-Item Performance Score.

Authors:  David Saliken; Nancy Dudek; Timothy J Wood; Matthew MacEwan; Wade T Gofton
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.414

Review 9.  Rater cognition: review and integration of research findings.

Authors:  Geneviève Gauthier; Christina St-Onge; Walter Tavares
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Faculty and Resident Perspectives on Using Entrustment Anchors for Workplace-Based Assessment.

Authors:  Nancy Dudek; Wade Gofton; Janelle Rekman; Allan McDougall
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT) to the traditional daily encounter card: measuring the quality of documented assessments.

Authors:  Kaitlin Endres; Nancy Dudek; Meghan McConnell; Warren J Cheung
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.410

2.  Reframing the O-SCORE as a Retrospective Supervision Scale Using Validity Theory.

Authors:  Walter Tavares; Wade Gofton; Farhan Bhanji; Nancy Dudek
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-02

3.  Direct Observation Tools in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Michael Gottlieb; Jaime Jordan; Jeffrey N Siegelman; Robert Cooney; Christine Stehman; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-09-04

4.  Feeling the flow with a serious game workshop: GridlockED as Medical Education 2 study (GAME2 study).

Authors:  Stephen J Hale; Sonja Wakeling; Anuja Bhalerao; Janatani Balakumaran; Simon Huang; Shawn Mondoux; J Bruce Blain; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2021-03-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.