| Literature DB >> 33149522 |
Himanshu Shrivastava1, Nidhi M Shah1, Rumiya Aysha2, Mitul Shah2, Nareen Chakravarthy3, Santosh R Duliganti1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Among all teeth, mandibular canine shows greatest variation in dimensions between the sexes, a phenomenon known as sexual dimorphism. This can be immensely beneficial to the forensic investigator for the purposes of both investigation and identification, as it significantly narrows down the possibilities, as the probable perpetrators and/or victims are concerned. Sex identification is an absolute necessity in cases of suicide, homicide, mass, casualties (both manmade or natural), and a tooth, which shows obvious sexual dimorphism can be a useful means of personal identification, especially where there has been extensive decomposition or destruction of facial soft tissue features. Another facet of forensic investigation is identification of racial origin. So, any odontometric parameter showing significant racial divergence can be used as a means of identification. AIM ANDEntities:
Keywords: Canine dimorphism; Gujaratis; dimorphic trait; non-Gujaratis
Year: 2020 PMID: 33149522 PMCID: PMC7595560 DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_175_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci ISSN: 0975-7406
Figure 1Mandibular study cast
Figure 3Cervico-incisal measurement of right mandibular canine
Comparison between Gujarati males and Gujarati females
| Measurement | Males | Females | Mean diff. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (in mm) | Mean ± SD (in mm) | |||
| Mesiodistal width (right) | 5.808 ± 0.29 | 5.376 ± 0.20 | 0.000 | 0.432 |
| Mesiodistal width (left) | 5.684 ± 0.27 | 5.336 ± 0.17 | 0.000 | 0.348 |
| Cervico-incisal length (right) | 7.736 ± 0.26 | 6.984 ± 0.17 | 0.000 | 0.751 |
| Cervico-incisal length (left) | 7.672 ± 0.30 | 7.036 ± 0.23 | 0.000 | 0.635 |
SD = standard deviation
Comparison between non-Gujarati males and non-Gujarati females
| Measurement | Males | Females | Mean diff. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (in mm) | Mean ± SD(in mm) | |||
| Mesiodistal width (right) | 6.468 ± 0.39 | 5.632 ± 0.20 | 0.000 | 0.835 |
| Mesiodistal width (left) | 6.516 ± 0.40 | 5.636 ± 0.21 | 0.000 | 0.880 |
| Cervico-incisal length (right) | 8.72 ± 0.92 | 7.58 ± 0.23 | 0.000 | 1.132 |
| Cervico-incisal length (left) | 8.728 ± 1.03 | 7.536 ± 0.20 | 0.000 | 1.192 |
SD = standard deviation
Comparison between Gujarati males and non-Gujarati males
| Measurement | Gujarati male | Non-Gujarati male | Mean diff. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (in mm) | Mean ± SD (in mm) | |||
| Mesiodistal width (right) | 5.808 ± 0.29 | 6.468 ± 0.39 | 0.000 | -0.65 |
| Mesiodistal width (left) | 5.684 ± 0.27 | 6.516 ± 0.40 | 0.000 | -0.83 |
| Cervico-incisal length (right) | 7.73 ± 0.26 | 8.72 ± 0.92 | 0.000 | -0.98 |
| Cervico-incisal length (left) | 7.67 ± 0.30 | 8.72 ± 1.03 | 0.000 | -1.05 |
SD = standard deviation
Comparison between Gujarati females and non-Gujarati females
| Measurement | Gujarati female | Non-Gujarati female | Mean diff. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (in mm) | Mean ± SD (in mm) | |||
| Mesiodistal width (right) | 5.37 ± 0.20 | 5.63 ± 0.20 | 0.000 | -0.256 |
| Mesiodistal width (left) | 5.33 ± 0.17 | 5.63 ± 0.21 | 0.000 | -0.30 |
| Cervico-incisal length (right) | 6.98 ± 0.17 | 7.58 ± 0.23 | 0.000 | -0.60 |
| Cervico-incisal length (left) | 7.03 ± 0.23 | 7.53 ± 0.20 | 0.000 | -0.50 |
SD = standard deviation