| Literature DB >> 33149437 |
Surekha Velidandla1, Sangameshwar Manikya1, Nirosha Gajjada1, Sridhar Reddy1, Lavanya Gogulamudi1, Shivaratna Mediconda2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Methods to analyze progression of carcinogenesis and stage of cancer are vital nowadays due to the high prevalence of these lesions. DNA ploidy analysis is one such important method in early diagnosis and improving prognosis. AIMS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Aneuploid; DNA ploidy; diploid; flow cytometry; leukoplakia; oral cancer
Year: 2020 PMID: 33149437 PMCID: PMC7595451 DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_33_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Bioallied Sci ISSN: 0975-7406
Figure 1High-resolution flow cytometry
Figure 2Mild epithelial dysplasia of leukoplakia and diploidy and aneuploidy demonstrated by peaks
Figure 5Poorly differentiated epithelium of oral squamous cell carcinoma and diploidy and aneuploidy demonstrated by peaks
Analysis of overall ploidy distribution among groups
| Condition | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leukoplakia | OSMF | OSCC | Control | |||||
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | |
| Aneuploid | 6 | 30.0 | 2 | 10.0 | 10 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 |
| Diploid | 14 | 70.0 | 18 | 90.0 | 10 | 50.0 | 20 | 100.0 |
| Total | 20 | 100.0 | 20 | 100.0 | 20 | 100.0 | 20 | 100.0 |
Analysis of association of the degree of dysplasia with ploidy status in leukoplakia
| Dysplasia and ploidy cross-tabulation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | Total | Chi-square | |||
| Aneuploid | Diploid | ||||
| Dysplasia | Mild dysplasia | 1 | 7 | 8 | χ2 = 3.316 |
| 12.5% | 87.5% | 100.0% | |||
| Moderate dysplasia | 2 | 5 | 7 | ||
| 28.6% | 71.4% | 100.0% | |||
| Severe dysplasia | 3 | 2 | 5 | ||
| 60.0% | 40.0% | 100.0% | |||
| Total | 6 | 14 | 20 | ||
| 30.0% | 70.0% | 100.0% | |||
Analysis of association of the degree of dysplasia with ploidy status in OSCC
| Dysplasia and ploidy cross-tabulation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | Total | Chi-square | |||
| Aneuploid | Diploid | ||||
| Dysplasia | Well differentiated | 4 | 6 | 10 | χ2 = 1.886 |
| 40.0% | 60.0% | 100.0% | |||
| Moderately differentiated | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||
| 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | |||
| Poorly differentiated | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 75.0% | 25.0% | 100.0% | |||
| Total | 9 | 11 | 20 | ||
| 45.0% | 55.0% | 100.0% | |||
Analysis of association of the condition with ploidy status
| Condition and ploidy cross-tabulation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ploidy | Total | Chi-square | |||
| Aneuploid | Diploid | ||||
| Condition | Leukoplakia | 6 | 14 | 20 | χ2 = 14.566 |
| 30.0% | 70.0% | 100.0% | |||
| OSMF | 2 | 18 | 20 | ||
| 10.0% | 90.0% | 100.0% | |||
| OSCC | 10 | 10 | 20 | ||
| 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | |||
| Control | 0 | 20 | 20 | ||
| 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |||
| Total | 17 | 63 | 80 | ||
| 21.2% | 78.8% | 100.0% | |||