| Literature DB >> 33149415 |
Mridula Goswami1, Sakshi Bhardwaj1, Navneet Grewal2.
Abstract
AIM ANDEntities:
Keywords: Developmental dental anomalies; Prevalence; Shape
Year: 2020 PMID: 33149415 PMCID: PMC7586474 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent ISSN: 0974-7052
Review of studies of shape anomalies—fusion and gemination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guttal et al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | Gemination + Fusion: 0.084% | – |
| Kathariya et al.[ | 2013 | 600 | Not mentioned | 1.06:1 | Gemination + Fusion: 3% | 1.57:1 |
| Shashirekha, Jena[ | 2013 | 1,062 | 15–30 years | 2.14 | Gemination + Fusion: 0.46% | – |
| Mukhopadhyay, Mitra[ | 2014 | 2,757 | 4–6 years | 1.14 | Gemination + Fusion: 0.39% | – |
| Lochib et al.[ | 2015 | 1,000 | 3–5 years | 1.14:1 | Gemination + Fusion: 0.5% | – |
| Shilpa et al.[ | 2017 | 4,180 | 2–6 years | 1.6:1 | Gemination + Fusion: 0.95% | 1.66:1 |
– Not specifed
Review of studies of shape anomalies—root anomalies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concrescence | ||||||
| Guttal et al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | 0.019 | 1:3 |
| Goutham et al.[ | 2017 | 1,080 | 18–62 years | 1:1 | 0.09 | 1:0 |
| Dilaceration | ||||||
| Guttal et al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | 0.39 | 1.28:1 |
| Goutham et al.[ | 2017 | 1,080 | 18–62 years | 1:1 | 16.48 | 0.91:1 |
| Supernumerary roots | ||||||
| Garg et al.[ | 2010 | 586 | 15-75 | 0.83:1 | 5.9 | 0.59:1 |
| Guttal et al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | 0.034 | 1.33:1 |
– Not specifed
Review of studies of shape anomalies—talons cusp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guttal et al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | 0.07 | 1:2 |
| Prabhu et al.[ | 2012 | 2,740 | 4–60 years | 1.25:1 | 0.58 | 3:1 |
| Gupta et al.[ | 2014 | 1,123 | >14 years | 1.04:1 | 0.97 | 1.75:1 |
| M ukhopadhyay, M itra[ | 2014 | 2,757 | 4–6 years | 1.14:1 | 0.07 | 1:1 |
| Shilpa et al.[ | 2017 | 4,180 | 2–6 years | 1.6:1 | 0.47 | – |
– Not specifed
Review of studies of shape anomalies—dens invaginatus and dens evaginatus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dens invaginatus | ||||||
| Guttal et al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | 0.019 | 9:1 |
| Patil et al.[ | 2013 | 4,133 | 13–38 years | 0.96:1 | 0.4 | 1.37:1 |
| Shashirekha, Jena[ | 2013 | 1,062 | 15–30 years | 2.14 | 0.18 | |
| Dens evaginatus | ||||||
| Guttalet al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | 0.04 | 9:1 |
| Gupta et al.[ | 2014 | 1,123 | >14 years | 1.04 | 2.40 | 0.66:1 |
– Not specifed
Review of studies of shape anomalies—taurodontism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guttal et al.[ | 2010 | 20,182 | >14 years | – | 0.3 | 1.17:1 |
| Gupta et al.[ | 2011 | 1,123 | >14 years | 1.04 | 2.49 | 0.72:1 |
| Patil et al.[ | 2013 | 4,133 | 13–38 years | 1.07:1 | 0.4 | 1.12:1 |
| Bharti et al.[ | 2015 | 1,000 | 20–70 years | 1:1 | 2.8 | 1.54:1 |
– Not specifed