Literature DB >> 33149372

Return of the Big Glitcher: NICER timing and glitches of PSR J0537-6910.

Wynn C G Ho1, Cristóbal M Espinoza2, Zaven Arzoumanian3, Teruaki Enoto4, Tsubasa Tamba5, Danai Antonopoulou6, Michał Bejger6, Sebastien Guillot7,8, Brynmor Haskell6, Paul S Ray9.   

Abstract

PSR J0537-6910, also known as the Big Glitcher, is the most prolific glitching pulsar known, and its spin-induced pulsations are only detectable in X-ray. We present results from analysis of 2.7 years of NICER timing observations, from 2017 August to 2020 April. We obtain a rotation phase-connected timing model for the entire timespan, which overlaps with the third observing run of LIGO/Virgo, thus enabling the most sensitive gravitational wave searches of this potentially strong gravitational wave-emitting pulsar. We find that the short-term braking index between glitches decreases towards a value of 7 or lower at longer times since the preceding glitch. By combining NICER and RXTE data, we measure a long-term braking index n = -1.25 ± 0.01. Our analysis reveals 8 new glitches, the first detected since 2011, near the end of RXTE, with a total NICER and RXTE glitch activity of 8.88 × 10-7 yr-1. The new glitches follow the seemingly unique time-to-next-glitch-glitch-size correlation established previously using RXTE data, with a slope of 5 d μHz-1. For one glitch around which NICER observes two days on either side, we search for but do not see clear evidence of spectral nor pulse profile changes that may be associated with the glitch.

Keywords:  X-rays: individual: PSR J0537–6910; gravitational waves; pulsars: individual: PSR J0537–6910; stars: neutron

Year:  2020        PMID: 33149372      PMCID: PMC7608024          DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa2640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mon Not R Astron Soc        ISSN: 0035-8711            Impact factor:   5.287


  5 in total

1.  A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent.

Authors:  G Pietrzyński; D Graczyk; A Gallenne; W Gieren; I B Thompson; B Pilecki; P Karczmarek; M Górski; K Suchomska; M Taormina; B Zgirski; P Wielgórski; Z Kołaczkowski; P Konorski; S Villanova; N Nardetto; P Kervella; F Bresolin; R P Kudritzki; J Storm; R Smolec; W Narloch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Crustal entrainment and pulsar glitches.

Authors:  N Chamel
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Pulsar glitches: the crust is not enough.

Authors:  N Andersson; K Glampedakis; W C G Ho; C M Espinoza
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Alteration of the magnetosphere of the Vela pulsar during a glitch.

Authors:  Jim Palfreyman; John M Dickey; Aidan Hotan; Simon Ellingsen; Willem van Straten
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Pinning down the superfluid and measuring masses using pulsar glitches.

Authors:  Wynn C G Ho; Cristóbal M Espinoza; Danai Antonopoulou; Nils Andersson
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.