| Literature DB >> 33149189 |
Oleg V Mamontov1,2, Alexey Y Sokolov3,4, Maxim A Volynsky5, Anastasija V Osipchuk3, Valery V Zaytsev5, Roman V Romashko6, Alexei A Kamshilin7,8.
Abstract
Assessment of the cerebral blood-flow-reserve in patients with cerebrovascular diseases is extremely important in terms of making prognosis, determining treatment tactics, and controlling the revascularization outcome in the case of reconstructive interventions on the brain vessels. However, there is no easy-to-use, contactless method for either assessing the functional reserve of the cortical vascular network or intraoperative monitoring of surgical intervention. Our study aims to demonstrate feasibility of green-light imaging photoplethysmography (iPPG) to estimate cerebrovascular functional reserve in animal model of craniosurgical intervention. Custom-made iPPG system was exploited to visualize intracranial vessels in anesthetized Wistar rats (n = 15). Video frames of rat's cortex were recorded concurrently with systemic blood pressure, end-tidal CO2, and electrocardiogram. We found that injection of dorzolamide (carbonic-anhydrase inhibitor) significantly increased the blood-pulsations amplitude in all animals by 35 ± 19% (p < 0.001). Such an increase negatively correlated with significant decrease in end-tidal CO2 by 32 ± 7% (p < 0.001). It is noteworthy that the dorzolamide injection did not lead to significant changes in systemic blood pressure. Concluding, pulsations amplitude is a marker of the vascular tone that can be used to evaluate the functional cerebrovascular reserve. Imaging PPG is a simple and convenient method to assess cerebral blood flow, including during various neurosurgical interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33149189 PMCID: PMC7642404 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75824-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Layout of the experimental setup for monitoring the response of the cortical-blood-flow and key-physiological parameters to the dorzolamide administration.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of the amplitude (APC) of the optical signal oscillating at the heart rate for one of the rats. (A) One of the recorded frames of the rat’s cortex with a dedicated area (marked by the orange line) in which the photoplethysmographic waveform was assessed. (B) Spatial distribution of APC overlaid with the initial cortex image as estimated at the first second of the experiment. (C) Mapping of APC after the dorzolamide injection calculated at 340th second of the experiment. The color scale on the right shows APC in percent, which is the same for both panels (B) and (C). Colored squares show the position of the selected areas (big ROIs) in which changes in mean APC were estimated.
Figure 3Typical responses of the measured physiological indices on the dorzolamide injection for one of the rats. (A) The normalized amplitude of the pulsatile component (APC) of the photoplethysmographic waveform assessed in the six selected areas shown in Fig. 2. The color of the waveforms coincides with that of the squares in Fig. 2 indicating the position of the big areas of interest. (B) Concentration of end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2). (C) Dynamics of the heart rate. (D) Systemic arterial pressure (its mean value, ABP). (E) Pulse pressure (PP). ABP and PP were measured invasively through a cannula in the animal’s femoral artery. The timeline (which is the same for all graphs) is displayed at the bottom indicating the stages of the experimental protocol.
Figure 4Response of the physiological parameters averaged over the whole group (n = 15) of animals to the dorzolamide injection. (A) Normalized amplitude of the pulsatile component of (APCN) the photoplethysmographic waveforms. (B) Relative changes in the end-tidal carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration. (C) Relative changes in the heart rate (HR). (D) Relative changes in the mean systemic arterial blood pressure (ABP). (E) Relative changes in the pulse pressure (PP) measured invasively in femoral vein. The circles in all graphs show the mean value whereas the whiskers are standard deviation. In all panels, the data before averaging were normalized to the respective mean value during the baseline for the correctness of averaging the experimental results with different rats.
Relative changes in the physiological indices of APC, end-tidal CO2, heart rate, mean blood pressure (ABP), and pulse pressure (PP) after administration of dorzolamide in the animals under study.
| Rat # | ΔAPC, % | ΔCO2, % | ΔHR, % | ΔABP, % | ΔPP, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | − 36 | − 6.4 | − 7.3 | 7.8 |
| 2 | 32 | − 37 | − 2.5 | 27.7 | 6.8 |
| 3 | 15 | − 37 | − 3.8 | 0.0 | 11.3 |
| 4 | 46 | − 34 | − 3.1 | − 12.5 | 28.1 |
| 5 | 23 | − 23 | − 2.8 | 4.3 | 15.2 |
| 6 | 40 | − 30 | − 5.6 | 14.8 | 49.7 |
| 7 | 50 | − 37 | − 3.9 | − 10.0 | 6.2 |
| 8 | 34 | − 23 | − 0.5 | 41.3 | 33.4 |
| 9 | 11 | − 37 | − 3.9 | 10.1 | 5.8 |
| 10 | 13 | − 33 | − 4.7 | 9.4 | 29.4 |
| 11 | 37 | − 21 | − 7.1 | − 1.6 | 16.8 |
| 12 | 40 | − 31 | − 5.8 | 7.8 | 22.0 |
| 13 | 55 | − 43 | − 4.8 | − 6.5 | 6.8 |
| 14 | 59 | − 24 | − 3.7 | 13.6 | 36.8 |
| 15 | 19 | − 39 | − 3.9 | − 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Mean ± SD | 36 ± 17 | − 32 ± 7 | − 4.2 ± 1.6 | 5.47 ± 14.3 | 18.8 ± 13.8 |
Correlation coefficients between the pairs of the physiological parameters APCN, CO2, HR, mean systemic ABP, and systemic PP measured in 15 rats.
| Rat | APCN vs. CO2 | APCN vs. HR | CO2 vs. HR | APCN vs. ABP | CO2 vs. ABP | HR vs. ABP | APCN vs. PP | CO2 vs. PP | HR vs. PP | ABP vs. PP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | − 0.75* | − 0.93 | 0.74 | − 0.70 | 0.26 | 0.74 | − 0.15 | − 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.64 |
| 2 | − 0.74 | − 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.42 | − 0.70 | − 0.18 | − 0.06 | − 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.43 |
| 3 | − 0.65 | − 0.88 | 0.77 | − 0.49 | − 0.06 | 0.49 | 0.36 | − 0.87 | − 0.50 | 0.40 |
| 4 | − 0.78 | − 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.41 | − 0.38 | − 0.37 | 0.91 | − 0.82 | − 0.88 | 0.52 |
| 5 | − 0.82 | − 0.89 | 0.82 | 0.36 | − 0.33 | − 0.16 | 0.77 | − 0.83 | − 0.81 | 0.48 |
| 6 | − 0.91 | − 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.69 | − 0.77 | − 0.69 | 0.89 | − 0.95 | − 0.90 | 0.85 |
| 7 | − 0.88 | − 0.76 | 0.85 | − 0.54 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.47 | − 0.38 | − 0.43 | − 0.07 |
| 8 | − 0.81 | − 0.50 | 0.16 | 0.64 | − 0.67 | 0.19 | 0.43 | − 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.67 |
| 9 | − 0.74 | − 0.63 | 0.92 | − 0.05 | − 0.22 | − 0.31 | − 0.22 | − 0.16 | − 0.30 | 0.87 |
| 10 | − 0.72 | − 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.31 | − 0.46 | − 0.35 | 0.59 | − 0.77 | − 0.68 | 0.78 |
| 11 | − 0.86 | − 0.96 | 0.79 | − 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.74 | − 0.84 | − 0.74 | 0.19 |
| 12 | − 0.87 | − 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.12 | − 0.28 | − 0.23 | 0.68 | − 0.85 | − 0.73 | 0.53 |
| 13 | − 0.96 | − 0.91 | 0.91 | − 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.20 | − 0.30 | − 0.37 | 0.34 |
| 14 | − 0.94 | − 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.36 | − 0.52 | − 0.15 | 0.79 | − 0.89 | − 0.52 | 0.80 |
| 15 | − 0.87 | − 0.76 | 0.91 | − 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.51 | − 0.11 | − 0.21 | − 0.19 | 0.61 |
| Mean r | − 0.82 | − 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.01 | − 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.42 | − 0.60 | − 0.44 | 0.54 |
*For all values given alone, p < 0.05.