Alexis M Roth1, Nguyen K Tran2, Marisa Felsher1, Annette B Gadegbeku3, Brogan Piecara1, Rachel Fox4, Douglas S Krakower5,6, Scarlett L Bellamy2, K Rivet Amico7, Jose A Benitez8, Barbara Van Der Pol9. 1. Departments of Community Health and Prevention; and. 2. Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Department of Family, Community, and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Division of Infectious Disease and HIV Medicine, College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. 5. The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 7. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 8. Prevention Point Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; and. 9. Division of Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To guide future preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation for women who inject drugs (WWID), a population increasingly represented in new HIV cases in the United States, we present results from a demonstration project integrated within a syringe services program (SSP) in Philadelphia, PA. METHODS: WWID ≥18 years were educated about and offered 24 weeks of daily PrEP. Participants completed surveys and clinical assessments at baseline and at weeks 1, 3, 12, and 24. We used descriptive statistics to estimate feasibility/acceptability, engagement in the care cascade, HIV/sexually transmitted diseases (STI) and pregnancy, issues of safety/tolerability, and preferences/satisfaction with PrEP services. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to identify factors associated with PrEP uptake and retention. RESULTS: We recruited 136 WWID. Of those, 95 were included in the final sample, and 63 accepted a PrEP prescription at week 1. Uptake was associated with greater baseline frequency of SSP access [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24 to 2.77], inconsistent condom use (aOR = 3.38; 95% CI: 1.07 to 10.7), and experiencing sexual assault (aOR = 5.89; 95% CI: 1.02, 33.9). Of these 95, 42 (44.2%) were retained at week 24. Retention was higher among women who reported more frequent baseline SSP access (aOR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.24). Self-reported adherence was high but discordant with urine-based quantification of tenofovir. Baseline STI prevalence was 17.9%; there were 2 HIV seroconversions and 1 pregnancy. Safety/tolerability issues were uncommon, and acceptability/satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating PrEP with SSP services is feasible and acceptable for WWID. This suggests that daily PrEP is a viable prevention tool for this vulnerable population.
INTRODUCTION: To guide future preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation for women who inject drugs (WWID), a population increasingly represented in new HIV cases in the United States, we present results from a demonstration project integrated within a syringe services program (SSP) in Philadelphia, PA. METHODS: WWID ≥18 years were educated about and offered 24 weeks of daily PrEP. Participants completed surveys and clinical assessments at baseline and at weeks 1, 3, 12, and 24. We used descriptive statistics to estimate feasibility/acceptability, engagement in the care cascade, HIV/sexually transmitted diseases (STI) and pregnancy, issues of safety/tolerability, and preferences/satisfaction with PrEP services. Multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to identify factors associated with PrEP uptake and retention. RESULTS: We recruited 136 WWID. Of those, 95 were included in the final sample, and 63 accepted a PrEP prescription at week 1. Uptake was associated with greater baseline frequency of SSP access [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24 to 2.77], inconsistent condom use (aOR = 3.38; 95% CI: 1.07 to 10.7), and experiencing sexual assault (aOR = 5.89; 95% CI: 1.02, 33.9). Of these 95, 42 (44.2%) were retained at week 24. Retention was higher among women who reported more frequent baseline SSP access (aOR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.24). Self-reported adherence was high but discordant with urine-based quantification of tenofovir. Baseline STI prevalence was 17.9%; there were 2 HIV seroconversions and 1 pregnancy. Safety/tolerability issues were uncommon, and acceptability/satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating PrEP with SSP services is feasible and acceptable for WWID. This suggests that daily PrEP is a viable prevention tool for this vulnerable population.
Authors: E Jennifer Edelman; Brent A Moore; Sarah K Calabrese; Gail Berkenblit; Chinazo Cunningham; Viraj Patel; Karran Phillips; Jeanette M Tetrault; Minesh Shah; David A Fiellin; Oni Blackstock Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-04
Authors: Marisa Felsher; Eliza Ziegler; Laramie R Smith; Susan G Sherman; K Rivet Amico; Rachel Fox; Kayla Madden; Alexis M Roth Journal: Arch Sex Behav Date: 2020-04-09
Authors: Jeanne M Marrazzo; Gita Ramjee; Barbra A Richardson; Kailazarid Gomez; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Gonasagrie Nair; Thesla Palanee; Clemensia Nakabiito; Ariane van der Straten; Lisa Noguchi; Craig W Hendrix; James Y Dai; Shayhana Ganesh; Baningi Mkhize; Marthinette Taljaard; Urvi M Parikh; Jeanna Piper; Benoît Mâsse; Cynthia Grossman; James Rooney; Jill L Schwartz; Heather Watts; Mark A Marzinke; Sharon L Hillier; Ian M McGowan; Z Mike Chirenje Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Leonieke C van Boekel; Evelien P M Brouwers; Jaap van Weeghel; Henk F L Garretsen Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: John Kinuthia; Jillian Pintye; Felix Abuna; Kenneth K Mugwanya; Harison Lagat; Dickens Onyango; Emily Begnel; Julia Dettinger; Jared M Baeten; Grace John-Stewart Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Angela R Bazzi; Chad J Valasek; Samantha A Streuli; Carlos F Vera; Alicia Harvey-Vera; Morgan M Philbin; Katie B Biello; Alexis M Roth; Steffanie A Strathdee; Heather A Pines Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 5.944
Authors: Carl G Streed; Jake R Morgan; Mam Jarra Gai; Marc R Larochelle; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jessica L Taylor Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Sarah K Calabrese; David A Kalwicz; Djordje Modrakovic; Valerie A Earnshaw; E Jennifer Edelman; Samuel R Bunting; Ana María Del Río-González; Manya Magnus; Kenneth H Mayer; Nathan B Hansen; Trace S Kershaw; Joshua G Rosenberger; Douglas S Krakower; John F Dovidio Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2021-11-09
Authors: Nguyen K Tran; Barbara Van Der Pol; Roman Shrestha; Angela R Bazzi; Scarlett L Bellamy; Susan G Sherman; Alexis M Roth Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Marisa Felsher; Eliza Ziegler; K Rivet Amico; Adam Carrico; Jennie Coleman; Alexis M Roth Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Anne M Teitelman; Hong-Van Tieu; Dalmacio Flores; Jacqueline Bannon; Bridgette M Brawner; Annet Davis; Paige Gugerty; Beryl Koblin Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2021-03-09