Literature DB >> 33148627

Evaluating the evidence for a neuroimaging subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder.

Michael Esterman1,2,3,4,5, Anna Stumps3,5,6, Audreyana Jagger-Rickels4,5,6, David Rothlein5,6, Joseph DeGutis3,5,6,7, Francesca Fortenbaugh3,6,7, Adrienne Romer6,7,8, William Milberg2,3,7,9, Brian P Marx10,4, Regina McGlinchey2,3,7,9.   

Abstract

A recent study used functional neuroimaging and cognitive tasks to identify posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) subtypes. Specifically, this study found that a subgroup of patients with verbal memory impairment had a unique neural signature, namely, decreased ventral attention network (VAN) resting-state functional connectivity, and these same individuals responded poorly to psychotherapy. Although this represents one of the first studies to propose a neurocognitive subtype of PTSD and has far-reaching translational potential, the generalizability and specificity of the observed neural network and cognitive domain remain unclear. We attempted to conceptually replicate and extend these findings in a similar cohort of combat-exposed veterans (n = 229) tested using a standardized battery of neuropsychological tests and a priori criteria for cognitive impairments. First, we conducted identical and complementary analyses to determine whether subjects with PTSD and neuropsychologically defined verbal memory deficits exhibited the VAN connectivity biomarker. Second, we examined whether cognitive deficits in other domains implicated in PTSD (executive functioning and attention) exhibited the VAN signature. Across multiple measures of verbal memory, we did not find that the subgroup of individuals with PTSD and memory impairments had lower VAN connectivity. However, a subgroup of individuals with PTSD and attentional impairments did have lower VAN connectivity, suggesting that the original subtype could have been related to attention and not memory impairments. Overall, our findings suggest that the previously identified memory-impaired PTSD subtype may not generalize. Further consideration of neuropsychological methods will be important for neurocognitive markers to be implemented clinically.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33148627     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz9343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  3 in total

Review 1.  Defining focal brain stimulation targets for PTSD using neuroimaging.

Authors:  S J H van Rooij; Lauren M Sippel; William M McDonald; Paul E Holtzheimer
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 8.128

2.  Dividing attention during the Timed Up and Go enhances associations of several subtask performances with MCI and cognition.

Authors:  Victoria N Poole; Robert J Dawe; Melissa Lamar; Michael Esterman; Lisa Barnes; Sue E Leurgans; David A Bennett; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Aron S Buchman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  An executive function subtype of PTSD with unique neural markers and clinical trajectories.

Authors:  Audreyana Jagger-Rickels; David Rothlein; Anna Stumps; Travis Clark Evans; John Bernstein; William Milberg; Regina McGlinchey; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 7.989

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.