| Literature DB >> 33147542 |
Esben Strodl1, Charlotte Markey2, Annie Aimé3, Rachel F Rodgers4, Jacinthe Dion5, Gianluca Lo Coco6, Salvatore Gullo7, Marita McCabe8, David Mellor9, Antonio Granero-Gallegos10, Alvaro Sicilia11, Gianluca Castelnuovo12, Michel Probst13, Christophe Maïano14, Gian Mauro Manzoni15, Catherine Begin16, Marie-Eve Blackburn17, Giada Pietrabissa18, Manuel Alcaraz-Ibánez19, Naomi Hayami-Chisuwa20, Qiqiang He21, Marie L Caltabiano22, Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz23.
Abstract
This study examined the measurement invariance of three scales that assessed emotional eating, restrained eating, and intuitive eating across eight countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Italy, Japan, Spain and the United States) in order to determine their suitability for cross-country body image research. A total of 6272 young adults took part in this study. Participants completed an online survey including the Emotional Eating subscale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-Revised 21, the Restraint subscale of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, and the Reliance on Hunger and Satiety Cues subscale of The Intuitive Eating Scale-2. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate potential cross-country differences in functioning of the measures. Partial invariance for all three scales was found, with only minor levels of non-invariance identified. Multiple indicator multiple cause models identified BMI and gender as potential influences on scores for these measures. Sources of invariance across groups are discussed, as well as implications for further substantive research across countries involving these measures.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-country; Emotional eating; Intuitive eating; Measurement invariance; Restraint eating; Young adults
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33147542 DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.09.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Body Image ISSN: 1740-1445