Literature DB >> 33146684

Urinary Tetrahydrocannabinol After 4 Weeks of a Full-Spectrum, High-Cannabidiol Treatment in an Open-label Clinical Trial.

M Kathryn Dahlgren1,2,3, Kelly A Sagar1,2,3, Ashley M Lambros1,2, Rosemary T Smith1,2, Staci A Gruber1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33146684      PMCID: PMC9429743          DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry        ISSN: 2168-622X            Impact factor:   25.911


× No keyword cloud information.
Despite the growing popularity of cannabidiol (CBD) products, specifically those derived from legal industrial hemp sources,[1] few studies have directly assessed whether the use of high-CBD products could yield positive results on urinary drug tests assessing cannabis use through the detection of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) metabolites. A recent short-term administration study found that a single exposure to vaporized CBD-dominant cannabis flower (CBD, 10.5%; Δ9-THC, 0.39%), which the authors noted was similar to hemp, resulted in positive drug test results (>15 ng/mL) for 2 of 6 participants within 4 to 8 hours of administration.[2] However, to our knowledge, no studies have examined drug test results in those consistently using full-spectrum (ie, Δ9-THC–containing) CBD products. Accordingly, as part of an open-label clinical trial (NCT02548559) examining the use of a full-spectrum high-CBD product for anxiety (with unpublished results as yet), we monitored THC urinary drug status.

Methods

This study was approved by the Partners Healthcare institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. Study enrollment was conducted at McLean Hospital between June 2018 and February 2020. Participants were required to be 18 years or older, report at least moderate levels of anxiety assessed using well-validated measures,[3,4] and test negative at baseline for 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH), a major metabolite of Δ9-THC. Patients did not use cannabis and could not use any other cannabis/cannabinoid–based products throughout the 4-week trial. Women were required to have a negative pregnancy test result. Exclusion criteria included serious medical illness (eg, kidney or liver disease, neurological disorder). The open-label phase was capped at 15 participants to determine dosing and tolerability. The CONSORT guidelines were followed. A protocol is available in the Supplement. The study product was formulated using a full-spectrum, high-CBD extract containing 9.97 mg/mL of CBD (1.04%) and 0.23 mg/mL of Δ9-THC (0.02%), as confirmed by ProVerde Laboratories. Patients self-administered 1 mL of the study product sublingually 3 times per day, for a targeted daily dose of approximately 30 mg of CBD and less than 1 mg of Δ9-THC. The actual dosage was quantified using outgoing vs incoming bottle weights, cross-referenced with weekly drug diaries. Urine drug assays (a 12-panel test, waived by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments[5]) assessed the presence of THC-COOH, which was confirmed via gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Quest Diagnostics). Exploratory logistic regression analyses (SPSS version 25 [IBM]; α = .05, 2-tailed) assessed associations between THC-positive status, demographic variables, and creatinine, which is reflective of kidney function and hydration.

Results

Of 15 patients enrolled (11 women [79%]; 12 White individuals [86%]), 1 discontinued participation because of use of another cannabinoid product; the remaining 14 patients completed all study procedures (Figure). The study drug was well tolerated; no serious adverse events were reported, and no patients reported psychoactivity. Patients used a mean (SD) of 3.48 (0.60) mL of the study product per day, equivalent to a mean (SD) of 34.73 (6.03) mg of CBD per day and 0.80 (0.14) mg of Δ9-THC per day. Results revealed that after 4 weeks, 7 participants (50%) tested positive for THC-COOH, while 7 tested negative. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry results confirmed assay findings but indicated that the drug screen was often more sensitive than its stated lower limit of detection (50 ng/mL). Participants’ THC status was only significantly associated with creatinine levels (B, 1.92; P < .001; Table).
Figure.

Study Recruitment and Enrollment

CONSORT flowchart of recruitment and enrollment for the open-label phase of clinical trial NCT02548559. COVID-19 indicates coronavirus disease 2019.

Table.

Demographics, Creatinine Levels, Product Use, and Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Metabolite Results Following 4 Weeks of Treatment With a Full-Spectrum, High-Cannabidiol Product

Participant No.Age, decadeEducation, yBMICreatinine quantification by GC-MS, mg/dLMean product use, mL/dbUrinary THC metabolite assay (THC-COOH)
Test resultcGC-MS quantification, ng/mLd
Individual-level data
160s1926.3021.502.32NegativeBLQ
250s1222.3025.702.69NegativeBLQ
320s1624.8048.302.91NegativeBLQ
440s1831.63128.563.19Positive13.10
560s1627.88NA3.34NegativeNA
640s1622.46264.813.37Positive71.50
720s1724.54141.033.48Positive33.00
820s1620.6053.333.48Negative8.00
920s1626.57126.003.67Positive63.00
1060s1825.8290.223.69Negative8.30
1160s1224.95212.503.84Positive34.00
1230s1530.11107.143.96Positive30.00
1320s1620.52146.514.12Positive43.00
1430s1834.5435.704.70NegativeBLQ
Summary data
Total No. (%)NANANANANA7 positive: 7 negative (50:50)NA
Mean (SD)41.4 (16.9)16.1 (2.1)25.93 (4.07)107.93 (73.54)3.48 (0.60)NA35.99 (24.60)
Univariate logistic regression results e
B (P value)−0.05 (.19)−0.19 (.51)−0.01 (.92)1.92 (<.001)1.17 (.28)NANA
Odds ratio (95% CI)0.95 (0.89-1.02)0.83 (0.47-1.45)0.99 (0.76-1.29)6.80 (<0.01-3.33 × 10237)3.21 (0.40-26.12)NANA

Abbreviations: BLQ, below the limit of quantification; BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); GC-MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; NA, not applicable; THC-COOH, 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

SI conversion factor: To convert creatinine to μmol/L, multiply by 88.4.

Individual ages are presented by decade to protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality. Individual-level data on participants’ self-selected race (via the established categories and definitions from the Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting; 12 White individuals [86%]; 2 Black individuals [14%]) and sex (11 women [79%]; 3 men [21%]) are omitted to protect privacy and confidentiality. None of these variables had a significant association with urinary THC-COOH status.

Participants are arranged in ascending order by the mean amount of product used.

Lower limit of detection of THC-COOH, 50 ng/mL.

One sample could not be verified via GC-MS; descriptive statistics are provided for samples with detectable levels of THC.

With urinary THC-COOH status as the dependent variable.

Study Recruitment and Enrollment

CONSORT flowchart of recruitment and enrollment for the open-label phase of clinical trial NCT02548559. COVID-19 indicates coronavirus disease 2019. Abbreviations: BLQ, below the limit of quantification; BMI, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared); GC-MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; NA, not applicable; THC-COOH, 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. SI conversion factor: To convert creatinine to μmol/L, multiply by 88.4. Individual ages are presented by decade to protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality. Individual-level data on participants’ self-selected race (via the established categories and definitions from the Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting; 12 White individuals [86%]; 2 Black individuals [14%]) and sex (11 women [79%]; 3 men [21%]) are omitted to protect privacy and confidentiality. None of these variables had a significant association with urinary THC-COOH status. Participants are arranged in ascending order by the mean amount of product used. Lower limit of detection of THC-COOH, 50 ng/mL. One sample could not be verified via GC-MS; descriptive statistics are provided for samples with detectable levels of THC. With urinary THC-COOH status as the dependent variable.

Discussion

The results suggest that patients consistently using full-spectrum, hemp-derived products may have positive test results for THC-COOH on a urinary drug screen. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to more thoroughly assess which variables (product use, body mass index, age, sex, race, medication use, etc) contribute to positive findings in only some individuals, particularly those with higher creatinine levels. Importantly, the study product contained 0.02% of Δ9-THC by weight; in the US, hemp-derived products can legally contain 0.30% or less of Δ9-THC by weight, more than 10 times the amount of Δ9-THC as the current study product. Despite limitations in sample size and diversity, these findings have important public health implications. It is often assumed individuals using hemp-derived products will test negative for THC. Current results indicate this may not be true, especially if assays are more sensitive than advertised, underscoring the potential for adverse consequences, including loss of employment and legal or treatment ramifications, despite the legality of hemp-derived products.
  2 in total

1.  Development and validation of an Overall Anxiety Severity And Impairment Scale (OASIS).

Authors:  Sonya B Norman; Shadha Hami Cissell; Adrienne J Means-Christensen; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.505

2.  Urinary Pharmacokinetic Profile of Cannabinoids Following Administration of Vaporized and Oral Cannabidiol and Vaporized CBD-Dominant Cannabis.

Authors:  Tory R Spindle; Edward J Cone; David Kuntz; John M Mitchell; George E Bigelow; Ronald Flegel; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 3.220

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Will tetrahydrocannabinol be formed from cannabidiol in gastric fluid? An in vivo experiment.

Authors:  Simon Franz; Josefine Herzog; Gisela Skopp; Frank Musshoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.791

2.  Pharmacokinetic Profile of ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabidiol and Metabolites in Blood following Vaporization and Oral Ingestion of Cannabidiol Products.

Authors:  Cecilia L Bergeria; Tory R Spindle; Edward J Cone; Dennis Sholler; Elia Goffi; John M Mitchell; Ruth E Winecker; George E Bigelow; Ronald Flegel; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.220

Review 3.  Cannabidiol (CBD) in Rheumatic Diseases (Musculoskeletal Pain).

Authors:  Kevin F Boehnke; Winfried Häuser; Mary-Ann Fitzcharles
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.686

Review 4.  A scoping review of the use of cannabidiol in psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Anna E Kirkland; Matthew C Fadus; Staci A Gruber; Kevin M Gray; Timothy E Wilens; Lindsay M Squeglia
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Urinary Pharmacokinetic Profile of Cannabidiol (CBD), Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Their Metabolites following Oral and Vaporized CBD and Vaporized CBD-Dominant Cannabis Administration.

Authors:  Dennis J Sholler; Tory R Spindle; Edward J Cone; Elia Goffi; David Kuntz; John M Mitchell; Ruth E Winecker; George E Bigelow; Ronald R Flegel; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.220

6.  Cannabinoid Content and Label Accuracy of Hemp-Derived Topical Products Available Online and at National Retail Stores.

Authors:  Tory R Spindle; Dennis J Sholler; Edward J Cone; Timothy P Murphy; Mahmoud ElSohly; Ruth E Winecker; Ronald R Flegel; Marcel O Bonn-Miller; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.