Literature DB >> 33146115

In-Hospital Death after Septic Shock Reversal: A Retrospective Analysis of In-Hospital Death among Septic Shock Survivors at Thailand's Largest National Tertiary Referral Center.

Chairat Permpikul1, Chaisith Sivakorn2, Surat Tongyoo1.   

Abstract

Advances in sepsis resuscitation have significantly improved shock control; however, many patients still die after septic shock reversal. We conducted a retrospective review to examine in-hospital death in whom shock was reversed and vasopressor was discontinued for 72 hours or longer. Factors independently associated with death were determined. Medical records of septic shock survivors from the medical intensive care unit of the Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, during January 2012-January 2019 were analyzed. A total of 350 septic shock patients were enrolled. Of these, 280 survived initial resuscitation. Eighty of 280 patients died, 45 died by 28 days (16.1%), and 35 (12.5%) died thereafter during their hospital stay. Multi-organ failure and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) were the leading causes of death, followed by other infection and noninfectious complication. Although the death group had more laboratory derangement and required more organ support, there were four factors associated with mortality from multivariate analysis. Hospital-acquired pneumonia was the leading factor, followed by sequential organ failure assessment score and serum albumin at 72 hours after discontinuation of vasopressors, and total intravenous fluid during 72 hours after discontinuation of vasopressors. In-hospital mortality after hemodynamic restoration in patients with septic shock was substantial. Causes and contributing factors were identified. Measures to mitigate these risks would be beneficial for rendering more favorable patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33146115      PMCID: PMC7790065          DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  5 in total

1.  Comprehensive Investigations of Multiple Factors That Are Related to Refractory Outcome in Urosepsis Patients.

Authors:  Takehiro Sejima; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Masashi Honda; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 1.371

Review 2.  Hypoalbuminemia as Surrogate and Culprit of Infections.

Authors:  Christian J Wiedermann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  A meta-analysis of accuracy and sensitivity of chest CT and RT-PCR in COVID-19 diagnosis.

Authors:  Fatemeh Khatami; Mohammad Saatchi; Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh; Zahra Sadat Aghamir; Alireza Namazi Shabestari; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Epidemiology and Burden of Sepsis at Thailand's Largest University-Based National Tertiary Referral Center during 2019.

Authors:  Lalita Tancharoen; Prat Pairattanakorn; Visanu Thamlikitkul; Nasikarn Angkasekwinai
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05

5.  High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Surat Tongyoo; Porntipa Tantibundit; Kiattichai Daorattanachai; Tanuwong Viarasilpa; Chairat Permpikul; Suthipol Udompanturak
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 6.925

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.