Literature DB >> 33145799

Improving Health Risk Assessment as a Basis for Public Health Decisions in the 21st Century.

Elizabeth L Anderson1, Gilbert S Omenn2, Paul Turnham1.   

Abstract

One-fifth of the way through the 21st century, a commonality of factors with those of the last 50 years may offer the opportunity to address unfinished business and current challenges. The recommendations include: (1) Resisting the tendency to oversimplify scientific assessments by reliance on single disciplines in lieu of clear weight-of-evidence expressions, and on single quantitative point estimates of health protective values for policy decisions; (2) Improving the separation of science and judgment in risk assessment through the use of clear expressions of the range of judgments that bracket protective quantitative levels for public health protection; (3) Use of comparative risk to achieve the greatest gains in health and the environment; and (4) Where applicable, reversal of the risk assessment and risk management steps to facilitate timely and substantive improvements in public health and the environment. Lessons learned and improvements in the risk assessment process are applied to the unprecedented challenges of the 21st century such as, pandemics and climate change. The beneficial application of the risk assessment and risk management paradigm to ensure timely research with consistency and transparency of assessments is presented. Institutions with mandated stability and leadership roles at the national and international levels are essential to ensure timely interdisciplinary scientific assessment at the interface with public policy as a basis for organized policy decisions, to meet time sensitive goals, and to inform the public.
© 2020 Society for Risk Analysis.

Keywords:  COVID-19; Climate; health risk assessment; policy; risk management

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33145799     DOI: 10.1111/risa.13617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  3 in total

1.  Is Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as Effective as Vaccination for Preventing Virus Diffusion? Measuring the Impacts of Failure in CERC with MERS-CoV Outbreak in South Korea.

Authors:  Ho Young Yoon
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.302

2.  Practical Opportunities to Improve the Impact of Health Risk Assessment on Environmental and Public Health Decisions.

Authors:  Tine Bizjak; Davor Kontić; Branko Kontić
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Getting through a COVID-19 winter: Physical coldness increases the perceived risk of coronavirus disease.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2022-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.