Literature DB >> 33145752

Trends in Restricting Symptoms at the End of Life from 1998 to 2019: A Cohort Study of Older Persons.

Thomas M Gill1, Evelyne A Gahbauer1, Linda Leo-Summers1, Terrence E Murphy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in the occurrence of restricting symptoms at the end of life from 1998 to 2019 and compare these changes according to the condition leading to death.
DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study.
SETTING: Greater New Haven, CT. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 665 decedents from a cohort of 754 community-living persons, 70 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: The occurrence of 16 restricting symptoms was ascertained during monthly interviews. Information on the conditions leading to death was obtained from death certificates and comprehensive assessments that were completed every 18-months. For each restricting symptom, adjusted rates (per 100 person-months) were calculated separately for six multiyear time intervals.
RESULTS: From 1998 to 2019, rates decreased for five (31.3%) restricting symptoms (difficulty sleeping; chest pain or tightness; shortness of breath; cold or flu symptoms; and nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea), increased for three (18.8%: arm or leg weakness; urinary incontinence; and memory or thinking problem), and changed little for the other eight (50.0%: poor eyesight; anxiety; depression; musculoskeletal pain; fatigue; dizziness or unsteadiness; frequent or painful urination; and swelling in feet or ankles). The decrease in rates was most pronounced for shortness of breath, with a reduction from 15.0 (95% credible interval = 11.7-18.6) in 1998 to 2001 to 8.2 (95% credible interval = 5.9-10.5) in 2014 to 2019, yielding a rate ratio (95% credible interval) of 0.92 (0.86-0.98). When evaluated according to the condition leading to death, the results were similar, with 10 of the 13 statistically significant rate ratios representing decreases in rates over time and only 3 representing increases.
CONCLUSION: The occurrence of most restricting symptoms at the end of life has been decreasing or stable over the past two decades. These results suggest that end-of-life care has been improving, although additional efforts will be needed to further reduce symptom burden at the end of life.
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  longitudinal study; older persons; palliative care; symptoms

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33145752      PMCID: PMC8186950          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  38 in total

1.  Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; C F Pieper; S G Leveille; K S Markides; G V Ostir; S Studenski; L F Berkman; R B Wallace
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 3.  In the clinic. Palliative care.

Authors:  Keith M Swetz; Arif H Kamal
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  The MOS social support survey.

Authors:  C D Sherbourne; A L Stewart
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The National Palliative Care Registry: A Decade of Supporting Growth and Sustainability of Palliative Care Programs.

Authors:  Maggie Rogers; Diane E Meier; Rachael Heitner; Melissa Aldridge; Lynn Hill Spragens; Amy Kelley; Stefanie R Nemec; R Sean Morrison
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 6.  Deprescribing for older patients.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Erica Weir
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making.

Authors:  Jesse Jansen; Vasi Naganathan; Stacy M Carter; Andrew J McLachlan; Brooke Nickel; Les Irwig; Carissa Bonner; Jenny Doust; Jim Colvin; Aine Heaney; Robin Turner; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-06-03

8.  Hospice Carve-In-Aligning Benefits With Patient and Family Needs.

Authors:  William H Shrank; Kristin Russell; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Diagnosis and Management of Dementia: Review.

Authors:  Zoe Arvanitakis; Raj C Shah; David A Bennett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cohort Profile: The Precipitating Events Project (PEP Study).

Authors:  T M Gill; L Han; E A Gahbauer; L Leo-Summers; T E Murphy
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.