Bart Keymeulen1,2, André van Maurik3, Dave Inman3, João Oliveira4, Rene McLaughlin5, Rachel M Gittelman6, Bart O Roep7,8, Pieter Gillard9, Robert Hilbrands10,11, Frans Gorus10,11, Chantal Mathieu9, Ursule Van de Velde10,11, Nicolas Wisniacki3, Antonella Napolitano12. 1. Academic Hospital and Diabetes Research Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. bart.keymeulen@vub.be. 2. Belgian Diabetes Registry, Brussels, Belgium. bart.keymeulen@vub.be. 3. GlaxoSmithKline Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, UK. 4. GlaxoSmithKline, Global Clinical Operations, Cambridge, UK. 5. Department of Immunology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 6. Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA, USA. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. 8. Department of Diabetes Immunology, Diabetes & Metabolism Research Institute, Beckman Research Institute at the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. 9. Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven-KUL, Leuven, Belgium. 10. Academic Hospital and Diabetes Research Center, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. 11. Belgian Diabetes Registry, Brussels, Belgium. 12. GlaxoSmithKline Medicines Research Centre, Stevenage, UK. Antonella.2.napolitano@gsk.com.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Numerous clinical studies have investigated the anti-CD3ɛ monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in individuals with type 1 diabetes, but limited progress has been made in identifying the optimal clinical dose with acceptable tolerability and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose-response, safety and tolerability, beta cell function preservation and the immunological effects of otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, 24 month study, conducted in five centres in Belgium via the Belgian Diabetes Registry, participants (16-27 years old, <32 days from diagnosis of type 1 diabetes) were scheduled to receive placebo or otelixizumab in one of four dose cohorts (cumulative i.v. dose 9, 18, 27 or 36 mg over 6 days; planned n = 40). Randomisation to treatment was by a central computer system; only participants and bedside study personnel were blinded to study treatment. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, and laboratory measures and vital signs. A mixed-meal tolerance test was used to assess beta cell function; exploratory biomarkers were used to measure T cell responses. RESULTS: Thirty participants were randomised/28 were analysed (placebo, n = 6/5; otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 9/8; otelixizumab 18 mg, n = 8/8; otelixizumab 27 mg, n = 7/7; otelixizumab 36 mg, n = 0). Dosing was stopped at otelixizumab 27 mg as the predefined EBV reactivation stopping criteria were met. Adverse event frequency and severity were dose dependent; all participants on otelixizumab experienced at least one adverse event related to cytokine release syndrome during the dosing period. EBV reactivation (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 2/9; 18 mg, n = 4/8: 27 mg, n = 5/7) and clinical manifestations (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 0/9; 18 mg, n = 1/8; 27 mg, n = 3/7) were rapid, dose dependent and transient, and were associated with increased productive T cell clonality that diminished over time. Change from baseline mixed-meal tolerance test C-peptide weighted mean AUC0-120 min following otelixizumab 9 mg was above baseline for up to 18 months (difference from placebo 0.39 [95% CI 0.06, 0.72]; p = 0.023); no beta cell function preservation was observed at otelixizumab 18 and 27 mg. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: A metabolic response was observed with otelixizumab 9 mg, while doses higher than 18 mg increased the risk of unwanted clinical EBV reactivation. Although otelixizumab can temporarily compromise immunocompetence, allowing EBV to reactivate, the effect is dose dependent and transient, as evidenced by a rapid emergence of EBV-specific T cells preceding long-term control over EBV reactivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02000817. FUNDING: The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Graphical abstract.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Numerous clinical studies have investigated the anti-CD3ɛ monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in individuals with type 1 diabetes, but limited progress has been made in identifying the optimal clinical dose with acceptable tolerability and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose-response, safety and tolerability, beta cell function preservation and the immunological effects of otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, 24 month study, conducted in five centres in Belgium via the Belgian Diabetes Registry, participants (16-27 years old, <32 days from diagnosis of type 1 diabetes) were scheduled to receive placebo or otelixizumab in one of four dose cohorts (cumulative i.v. dose 9, 18, 27 or 36 mg over 6 days; planned n = 40). Randomisation to treatment was by a central computer system; only participants and bedside study personnel were blinded to study treatment. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, and laboratory measures and vital signs. A mixed-meal tolerance test was used to assess beta cell function; exploratory biomarkers were used to measure T cell responses. RESULTS: Thirty participants were randomised/28 were analysed (placebo, n = 6/5; otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 9/8; otelixizumab 18 mg, n = 8/8; otelixizumab 27 mg, n = 7/7; otelixizumab 36 mg, n = 0). Dosing was stopped at otelixizumab 27 mg as the predefined EBV reactivation stopping criteria were met. Adverse event frequency and severity were dose dependent; all participants on otelixizumab experienced at least one adverse event related to cytokine release syndrome during the dosing period. EBV reactivation (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 2/9; 18 mg, n = 4/8: 27 mg, n = 5/7) and clinical manifestations (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 0/9; 18 mg, n = 1/8; 27 mg, n = 3/7) were rapid, dose dependent and transient, and were associated with increased productive T cell clonality that diminished over time. Change from baseline mixed-meal tolerance test C-peptide weighted mean AUC0-120 min following otelixizumab 9 mg was above baseline for up to 18 months (difference from placebo 0.39 [95% CI 0.06, 0.72]; p = 0.023); no beta cell function preservation was observed at otelixizumab 18 and 27 mg. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: A metabolic response was observed with otelixizumab 9 mg, while doses higher than 18 mg increased the risk of unwanted clinical EBV reactivation. Although otelixizumab can temporarily compromise immunocompetence, allowing EBV to reactivate, the effect is dose dependent and transient, as evidenced by a rapid emergence of EBV-specific T cells preceding long-term control over EBV reactivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02000817. FUNDING: The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Graphical abstract.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody; Autoreactive T cell; Epstein–Barr virus reactivation; Islet autoimmunity; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Georgios Vlasakakis; Antonella Napolitano; Ruth Barnard; Kim Brown; Jonathan Bullman; David Inman; Bart Keymeulen; David Lanham; Quentin Leirens; Alexander MacDonald; Enrica Mezzalana; Kevin Page; Minesh Patel; Caroline O Savage; Stefano Zamuner; Andre van Maurik Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-02-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: S Alice Long; Jerill Thorpe; Hannah A DeBerg; Vivian Gersuk; James Eddy; Kristina M Harris; Mario Ehlers; Kevan C Herold; Gerald T Nepom; Peter S Linsley Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2016-11-18
Authors: Kevan C Herold; Brian N Bundy; S Alice Long; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Linda A DiMeglio; Matthew J Dufort; Stephen E Gitelman; Peter A Gottlieb; Jeffrey P Krischer; Peter S Linsley; Jennifer B Marks; Wayne Moore; Antoinette Moran; Henry Rodriguez; William E Russell; Desmond Schatz; Jay S Skyler; Eva Tsalikian; Diane K Wherrett; Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Carla J Greenbaum Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-06-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronnie Aronson; Peter A Gottlieb; Jens S Christiansen; Thomas W Donner; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce W Bode; Paolo Pozzilli Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: B Keymeulen; M Walter; C Mathieu; L Kaufman; F Gorus; R Hilbrands; E Vandemeulebroucke; U Van de Velde; L Crenier; C De Block; S Candon; H Waldmann; A G Ziegler; L Chatenoud; D Pipeleers Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Simke Demeester; Bart Keymeulen; Leonard Kaufman; Annelien Van Dalem; Eric V Balti; Ursule Van de Velde; Patrick Goubert; Katrijn Verhaeghen; Howard W Davidson; Janet M Wenzlau; Ilse Weets; Daniel G Pipeleers; Frans K Gorus Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 19.112