| Literature DB >> 33145282 |
Liping Liang1,2, Lijun Shen1,2, Guoxiang Fu3, Ye Yao1,2, Guichao Li1,2, Yun Deng1,2, Hui Zhang1,2, Menglong Zhou1,2, Wang Yang1,2, Guoqiang Hua3,4, Zhen Zhang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiation enteritis is common in cancer patients with abdominal and pelvic malignant tumors that have received radiotherapy. Regeneration of intestinal stem cells is a critical process for intestine self-repairing post-irradiation. In this study, we attempted to find out the molecules that promote the regeneration of intestinal stem cells to repair the irradiation damage.Entities:
Keywords: CD44; Intestine stem cell; regeneration; wnt11
Year: 2020 PMID: 33145282 PMCID: PMC7575967 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1The regeneration of intestinal stem cells in vivo and in vitro. (A) Representative images of the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of the small intestine sections from control and irradiated (IR) mice at day 3.5, 5, and 10; (B) representative images of the organoids of the mouse small intestine from control and IR at day 3.5 and 5.
Figure 2The expression of CD44 is higher in the regenerated crypts while Lgr5 is lower. (A) Representative images (40×) of Lgr5 in situ hybridization staining and CD44 immunofluorescence staining of intestinal sections in control and IR mice at day 3.5, 5 and 10. (B) The expressions of Lgr5 and CD44 of mouse small intestine crypts were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in control and IR mice at day 3.5, 5 and 10. (C) The expressions of Lgr5 and CD44 of mouse small intestinal organoids were measured by qRT-PCR in control and IR at day 5. The data shown are the means ± SDs from at least three independent experiments. *, P<0.05.
Figure 3FACS analysis of CD44(+) cells. (A) Representative images of mouse crypts in control and irradiated at day 5, black arrows pointing to the crypts. (B) Representative image of the dot plot analysis of FACS, propidium iodide (PI) staining for live cells, CD45 staining for white cells, EpCAM staining for epithelial cells. (C) The peak map analysis of CD44(+) in control and IR group.
Figure 4Wnt11 increases significantly in the regenerating intestinal stem cells. (A) The expression of Wnt11 in the control and irradiated group according to the RNA-seq results. (B) The expression of Wnt11 of mouse small intestine crypts was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) from control and irradiated (IR) mice at day 3.5, 5, and 10. (C) The expression of Wnt11 of mouse small intestine organoids was measured by qRT-PCR from control and IR at day 5. The data shown are the means ± SDs. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01.
Figure 5Wnt11 can facilitate the regeneration of the intestinal stem cell. (A) The expression of Wnt11 in CHO-Wnt11 cell lines and CHO-NC cell lines by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). (B) Representative images of newborn organoids of the mouse small intestine culturing by Wnt11 conditioned medium (CM) and the control after IR at day 5. (C) The sizes of the newborn organoids of the Wnt11 CM and control group were measured by calculating the pixels of the organoids. (D) The budding of the newborn organoids of the Wnt11 CM and control group. The data shown are means ± SDs. **, P<0.01.