Literature DB >> 33144366

Parents' expectations and experiences of the 6-week baby check: a qualitative study in primary care.

Gill Gilworth1, Sarah Milton2, Angel Chater3, Irwin Nazareth4, Andreas Roposch5, Judith Green1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) programme requires all babies to have a comprehensive health check at 6-8 weeks of age. These are typically completed by GPs. Although person-centred care has achieved prominence in maternity care policy in recent years, there is limited empirical evidence on what parents and/or carers expect from the check, and how far experiences meet their needs. AIM: To explore the expectations and experiences of parents attending their GP for a baby check. DESIGN &
SETTING: A qualitative study was undertaken in primary care in London.
METHOD: Content analysis was undertaken of transcripts of semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with a total of 16 participants (14 mothers and two fathers) who had recently attended for a 6-week check for their baby.
RESULTS: Despite the availability of plentiful sources of general advice on infants' health and development, a thorough check by a trusted GP was an important milestone for most parents. They had few specific expectations of the check in terms of what examinations were undertaken, but even experienced parents anticipated reassurance about their baby's normal development. Many also hoped for reassurance about their own parenting. Parents appreciated GPs who explained what they were doing during the examination; space to raise any concerns; and combined mother and baby checks. Referrals to secondary care were generally experienced as reassuring rather than a source of anxiety.
CONCLUSION: The baby check meets needs beyond those of the NIPE screening programme. Protecting the time for a thorough consultation is important for parents at what can be a vulnerable time.
Copyright © 2020, The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  general practice; infant; parents; qualitative research

Year:  2020        PMID: 33144366      PMCID: PMC7880180          DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJGP Open        ISSN: 2398-3795


  11 in total

1.  Calling time on the 10-minute consultation.

Authors:  Jonathan Silverman; Paul Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Detection of congenital heart disease in mid-Essex.

Authors:  Jogesh Kapadia; Mahesh R N Babu
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Reassurance or judgement? Parents' views on the delivery of child health surveillance programmes.

Authors:  Brenda Roche; Sarah Cowley; Niki Salt; Amy Scammell; Mary Malone; Philippa Savile; Daphine Aikens; Susan Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  GPs' perceptions of workload in England: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Caroline Hd Croxson; Helen F Ashdown; Fd Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  GP views on strategies to cope with increasing workload: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Rebecca Fr Fisher; Caroline Hd Croxson; Helen F Ashdown; Fd Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Behaviour change opportunities at mother and baby checks in primary care: a qualitative investigation of the experiences of GPs.

Authors:  Hannah Talbot; Emily Strong; Sarah Peters; Debbie M Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period.

Authors:  Louise M Howard; Emma Molyneaux; Cindy-Lee Dennis; Tamsen Rochat; Alan Stein; Jeannette Milgrom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence.

Authors:  Norma I Gavin; Bradley N Gaynes; Kathleen N Lohr; Samantha Meltzer-Brody; Gerald Gartlehner; Tammeka Swinson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Evaluation of primary care 6- to 8-week hip check for diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a 15-year observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ronnie Davies; Christopher Talbot; Robin Paton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Barriers and facilitators to GP-patient communication about emotional concerns in UK primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daisy Parker; Richard Byng; Chris Dickens; Debbie Kinsey; Rose McCabe
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding physician behaviour in the 6-8 weeks hip check in primary care: a qualitative study using the COM-B.

Authors:  Angel Chater; Sarah Milton; Judith Green; Gill Gilworth; Andreas Roposch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.