Literature DB >> 33144236

Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Inside Technique With and Without Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement.

Chad W Parkes1, Devin P Leland1, Bruce A Levy1, Michael J Stuart1, Christopher L Camp1, Daniel B F Saris1, Aaron J Krych2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the (1) rates of complications and reoperations, (2) rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure, and (3) patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients after hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with and without independent suture tape reinforcement at a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up.
METHODS: We performed a 1:2 matched-cohort comparison of patients who underwent hamstring autograft ACLR with and without independent suture tape reinforcement between July 2011 and July 2017. Patients were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, preinjury Tegner activity score, and concomitant meniscal injury. Medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, additional injuries, and concomitant procedures. PRO scores (including Tegner activity, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores) and physical examination findings were collected both preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients who underwent ACLR were included: 36 patients (mean age, 25.3 years; range, 13-44 years) with independent suture tape reinforcement and 72 patients (mean age, 24.9 years; range, 13-54 years) without suture tape reinforcement. Overall, 5 of 36 suture tape patients (14%) and 10 of 72 control patients (14%) underwent reoperations. At an average follow-up of 26.1 months in the suture tape cohort and 31.3 months in the control cohort, 1 patient in the suture tape cohort and 4 patients in the control cohort experienced graft failure. There were no statistically significant differences between the suture tape and control groups regarding return-to-sport rate (89% and 88%, respectively), postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score (94.4 and 93.8, respectively), and postoperative Lysholm score (95.6 and 94, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference between the suture tape and control groups in postoperative Tegner activity score, at 7.1 (95% confidence interval, 6.5-7.6) and 6.4 (95% confidence interval, 6.2-6.6), respectively (P = .026).
CONCLUSIONS: ACLR with hamstring autograft and independent suture tape reinforcement was performed safely with low rates of complications, graft failure, and reoperations with similar PROs, function, and return-to-sport rates when compared with hamstring autograft ACLR without suture tape reinforcement at a minimum 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2020 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33144236      PMCID: PMC7867617          DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  30 in total

1.  Intra-Articular Biocompatibility of Multistranded, Long-Chain Polyethylene Suture Tape in a Canine ACL Model.

Authors:  Patrick A Smith; Chantelle C Bozynski; Keiichi Kuroki; Sarah M Henrich; Coen A Wijdicks; James L Cook
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 2.  Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure.

Authors:  Evan J Conte; Adam E Hyatt; Charles J Gatt; Aman Dhawan
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair with Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation.

Authors:  William T Wilson; Graeme P Hopper; Paul A Byrne; Gordon M MacKay
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2016-10-26

4.  Superior knee flexor strength at 2 years with all-inside short-graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs a conventional hamstring technique.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kouloumentas; Efstratios Kavroudakis; Efstathios Charalampidis; Dimitris Kavroudakis; Georgios K Triantafyllopoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  In vivo assessment of high-molecular-weight polyethylene core suture tape for intra-articular ligament reconstruction: an animal study.

Authors:  Endre Soreide; Janet M Denbeigh; Eric A Lewallen; Roman Thaler; Wei Xu; Lawrence Berglund; Jie J Yao; Anthony Martinez; Lars Nordsletten; Andre J van Wijnen; Sanjeev Kakar
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Independent Suture Tape Reinforcement of Tripled Smaller-Diameter and Quadrupled Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Tibial Screw Fixation: A Biomechanical Full Construct Model.

Authors:  Benjamin C Noonan; Samuel Bachmaier; Coen A Wijdicks; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; A F Anderson; A L Boland; C D Harner; M Kurosaka; P Neyret; J C Richmond; K D Shelborne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.

Authors:  Brian T Samuelsen; Kate E Webster; Nick R Johnson; Timothy E Hewett; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Arthroscopic Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Gregory S DiFelice
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-09-11

10.  Technique for Arthroscopically Assisted Superficial and Deep Medial Collateral Ligament-Meniscotibial Ligament Repair With Internal Brace Augmentation.

Authors:  Aaron K Black; Calvin Schlepp; Matthew Zapf; John B Reid
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-10-29
View more
  5 in total

1.  Bench to Bedside: A Multidisciplinary Approach toward the Unknowns after ACL Injuries to Drive Individual Success.

Authors:  Richard Ma; Trent Guess; David Echelmeyer; James P Stannard
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

2.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Tape Internal Brace Reinforcement of Soft Tissue Allografts for ACL Reconstruction Using a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Eric D Wicks; Jason Stack; Nima Rezaie; Ibrahim Mamdouh Zeini; Daryl C Osbahr
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the T-lock Osteotrans resorbable tendon anchor: early experience and midterm follow-up.

Authors:  Y Bangert; A Jaber; F Wünnemann; G Berrsche; N Streich; C Rehnitz; H Ott; A Barié
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Suture tape reinforcement of hamstring tendon graft reduces postoperative knee laxity after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Christoffer von Essen; Vasileios Sarakatsianos; Riccardo Cristiani; Anders Stålman
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Suture Tape Augmentation: Button Tie-Over Technique (BTOT).

Authors:  Ahmed Hassan Waly; Hosam Ibraheiem ElShafie; Mohamed Gamal Morsy; Marwan Hosam ElShafie; Mostafa Ashraf Galal; El Hussein Mohamed Ayman; Hesham Mohamed Gawish
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-11-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.