Literature DB >> 33143989

Safety of enzymatic debridement in extensive burns larger than 15% total body surface area.

Daniel A Hofmaenner1, Peter Steiger1, Reto A Schuepbach1, Stephanie Klinzing1, Mathias Waldner2, Holger Klein2, Katharina Enthofer1, Pietro Giovanoli2, Lijo Mannil2, Philipp Karl Buehler3, Jan A Plock2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement has emerged as an alternative to surgical eschar removal. Indications include partial thickness, mixed pattern, and full-thickness burns. Enzymatic debridement has been approved by the European Medicines Agency for treating burn wounds affecting <15% total body surface area (TBSA). Data and evidence for the treatment of areas >15% TBSA in one session is scarce. The aim of this retrospective study was to retrospectively analyze off-label use of enzymatic debridement in a single burn center for large TBSA burns.
METHODS: Between 01/2017 and 12/2018, 59 patients with partial- to full-thickness burns underwent enzymatic debridement in a single center study. Patients were categorized into two groups: the regular use group with a treated area less than 15% TBSA and the off-label group (OG) with larger TBSA debrided in one session. Treatment was evaluated for systemic inflammatory reaction, bleeding, hemodynamic instability and electrolyte shifts.
RESULTS: In total, 49 patients were treated in the regular use group with a median application area of 6% (IQR 2.5-9.5) and 10 patients were treated in the off-label group with a median application area of 18% (IQR 15-19) TBSA. We found no significant differences regarding blood pressure, body temperature or hemodynamic stability during and after enzymatic debridement. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed in either group. Catecholamine use was similar in both groups. No differences in leukocyte counts, CRP, PCT and lactate prior to application and during the following three days were observed. Sodium, potassium, chloride and phosphate levels did not differ. We found no evidence of an electrolyte shift. Survival was 49 of 49 patients (100%) in the RG and 7 of 10 patients (70%) in the OG (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: Enzymatic debridement did not result in any expected or unexpected side effects in the patient groups investigated. These preliminary results indicate the potential safety of bromelain-based enzymatic debridementin the treatment of burns greater than 15% TBSA.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bromelain based enzymatic debridement; Burn patient; Side effects

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33143989     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of Bromelain-Based Enzymatic Debridement Combined with Laser Doppler Imaging and Healing of Burn Wounds.

Authors:  Tomasz Korzeniowski; Jerzy Strużyna; Kamil Torres
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-08-03

2.  Preliminary Single-Center Experience of Bromelain-Based Eschar Removal in Children with Mixed Deep Dermal and Full Thickness Burns.

Authors:  Tomasz Korzeniowski; Ewelina Grywalska; Jerzy Strużyna; Magdalena Bugaj-Tobiasz; Agnieszka Surowiecka; Izabela Korona-Głowniak; Magdalena Staśkiewicz; Kamil Torres
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  The effect of COVID-19 in a newly established burn center.

Authors:  Sabriye Dayı; Selma Beyeç; Şeyhmus Alpağat
Journal:  Burns Open       Date:  2021-06-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.