| Literature DB >> 33143650 |
Xiaofang Zhang1,2,3, Caoxin Huang1,2,3, Xuejun Li1,2,3,4, Zhaoshui Shangguan5, Wenjing Wei1,2,3, Suhuan Liu5, Shuyu Yang6,7,8, Yijie Liu9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The occurrence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is found to be higher in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which is characterized by intermittent hypoxia. Activation of hypoxia-inducible factors has been shown in the development and progression of NAFLD, implying a cause and effects relationship between NAFLD and hypoxia. The present study was designed to investigate the interaction of lipotoxicity and hypoxia in the pathogenesis of NAFLD using mice model with high-fat diet (HFD) feeding or hypoxic treatment.Entities:
Keywords: HIF; Hypoxia; NAFLD; Steatosis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33143650 PMCID: PMC7640429 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01515-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1The effect of HFD on fat accumulation and hypoxia conditions in the liver. a Body weight; b liver weight; c TG levels; d oil red O and HE staining, (original magnifications, × 100); and e expression of hypoxic proteins. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5–9 in each group. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.005
Fig. 2The effect of palmitate acid on fat accumulation and hypoxia conditions in cultured primary hepatocytes. a Oil red O staining; b expression of hypoxic proteins detected by immunofluoroscence staining; c expression of hypoxic proteins detected by Western Blotting; d expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5
Fig. 3The effect of FFA- or hypoxia-induced TG accumulation in primary hepatocytes were not HIFα dependent. a Oil red O staining. b HIF1- and 2α knockdown in primary hepatocytes by siRNA. Oil red O staining in FFA- (c), CoCl2- (d) and hypoxia-treated. e Primary hepatocytes with HIF-1α and HIF-2α deletion. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 5
Fig. 4The effect of hypoxia on hepatic TG accumulation. a Expression of hypoxic proteins; b Oil red O and HE staining (original magnifications, × 100); c TG levels; d Expression of lipogenic and lipolysis genes. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM, n = 4–6. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01