| Literature DB >> 33143293 |
Young Joo Oh1,2, Tae Seok Kim1, Hwang Woo Moon1, So Young Lee1, Sang Yun Lee1, Geun Eog Ji2, Keum Taek Hwang2.
Abstract
Lactobacillus plantarum PMO 08 was evaluated as a starter culture for plant-based probiotic beverages. Its viability under various culture conditions and acidification ability in standardized tomato medium, fermentation parameters, and beverage properties were assessed. Lactobacillus plantarum PMO 08 could grow under various culture conditions; there was a high correlation between the incubation time to reach the optimal conditions and the inoculation concentration of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) (r2 = 0.997). Acidity (0.958 ± 0.002%) and LAB count (9.78 ± 0.14 Log10 CFU/mL) were significantly higher when fermented with L. plantarum than with the yogurt starter culture. A survival rate of 96% and 95% in artificial gastric juice and artificial intestinal juice, respectively, indicated that the probiotic requirements were met. The total polyphenol and glutamine content, and antioxidant activity increased after fermentation. The proline content significantly increased in L. plantarum PMO 08- fermented beverage. Thus, L. plantarum PMO 08 is an effective starter culture for non-dairy probiotic beverages whose functional quality may be improved by fermentation.Entities:
Keywords: L. plantarum PMO 08; kimchi; non-dairy probiotic beverage; plant-based fermented beverage; probiotic starter culture; tomato juice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33143293 PMCID: PMC7663223 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effect of culture conditions on bacterial cell growth. (A) Temperature, (B) pH, and (C) NaCl concentration. PMO 08: Lactobacillus plantarum PMO 08; Yogurt: Starter culture mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus thermophilus, and Bifidobacterium lactis. All values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Values with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test. * Significant difference between PMO 08 and yogurt (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Acidification curves for different inoculation levels of L. plantarum PMO 08 in diluted tomato juice. All values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Fermentation was performed at 37 °C.
Physicochemical and microbial characterization of fermented and non-fermented beverages.
| Non-Fermented Beverage | Fermented Beverage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | PMO 08 | Yogurt | |
|
| 4.66 ± 0.02 NS | 4.63 ± 0.03 | 4.36 ± 0.01 |
|
| 0.312 ± 0.016 a | 0.958 ± 0.002 c | 0.867 ± 0.003 b |
|
| 4.47 ± 0.01 a | 3.39 ± 0.03 c | 3.60 ± 0.03 b |
|
| ND | ND | ND |
|
| ND | ND | ND |
|
| ND | - | - |
|
| - | 9.78 ± 0.14 * | 7.64 ± 0.27 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). a–c Values with different superscripts within the same row are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). * p < 0.05, compared with the yogurt starter culture (yogurt) according to the t-test. NS, not significantly different. -, not analyzed. ND, not detectable (<1 CFU/mL).
Figure 3Viability of fermented beverages in the artificial gastrointestinal juice. (A) Artificial gastric juice condition (pH 2.5) with 0.3% pepsin. (B) 0.45% bile salts condition with 0.1% pancreatin. PMO 08: Fermented beverage with L. plantarum PMO 08; Yogurt: Fermented beverage with yogurt starter culture containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus thermophilus, and Bifidobacterium lactis. The viable count of lactic acid bacteria was determined by plating the cells from each stage on MRS agar followed by incubation at 37 °C for 48 h. Before: Viable cell count of each fermented beverage before the test; after: Viable cell count of each fermented beverage after the test. Values are represented as the mean of three replicates and error bars represent the standard deviation. Different lowercase and uppercase letters on the error bars indicate significant differences in PMO 08 and yogurt starter culture, respectively (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Changes in the total polyphenol content and antioxidant activity during fermentation. (A) Total polyphenol content. Values are represented as the mean of three replicates and error bars represent the standard deviation. (B) 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity. Control: Non-fermented tomato juice beverage; PMO 08: Tomato juice fermented by L. plantarum PMO 08; Yogurt: Tomato juice fermented by yogurt starter culture containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus thermophilus, and Bifidobacterium lactis. 1st column (blue), 2.5% of each beverage concentration (v/v); 2nd column (green), 5% of each beverage concentration (v/v); 3rd column (red), 10% of each beverage concentration (v/v). Each of the beverages was diluted with purified water. Different uppercase letters denote significant differences between different concentrations of the same type of fermented beverage. Different lowercase letters denote significant differences between the three types of fermented beverages (p < 0.05).
Changes in the free amino acid composition of fermented beverages.
| Amino Acid (mg/100 g) | Non-Fermented Beverage | Fermented Beverage | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | PMO 08 | Yogurt | |||||||
|
| 6.22 | ± | 0.005 a | 4.30 | ± | 0.065 c | 5.50 | ± | 0.050 b |
|
| 2.66 | ± | 0.001 a | 0.94 | ± | 0.025 c | 2.21 | ± | 0.015 b |
|
| 2.44 | ± | 0.010 a | 1.16 | ± | 0.025 c | 1.76 | ± | 0.010 b |
|
| 14.63 | ± | 0.005 a | 8.58 | ± | 0.110 c | 10.91 | ± | 0.080 b |
|
| 4.36 | ± | 0.040 c | 4.82 | ± | 0.210 a | 4.71 | ± | 0.285 ab |
|
| 2.58 | ± | 0.030 a | 1.52 | ± | 0.190 b | 1.26 | ± | 0.155 b |
|
| 3.87 | ± | 0.045 a | 3.26 | ± | 0.055 c | 3.55 | ± | 0.015 b |
|
| 2.12 | ± | 0.010 a | 0.00 | ± | 0.000 c | 0.67 | ± | 0.045 b |
|
| 2.37 | ± | 0.135 a | 0.25 | ± | 0.000 c | 1.16 | ± | 0.035 b |
|
| 0.74 | ± | 0.050 a | 0.00 | ± | 0.000 c | 0.00 | ± | 0.000 b |
|
| 7.33 | ± | 0.005 a | 4.91 | ± | 0.045 c | 6.02 | ± | 0.005 b |
|
| 1.66 | ± | 0.026 a | 0.00 | ± | 0.00 c | 0.72 | ± | 0.06 b |
|
| 126.05 | ± | 0.020 a | 109.78 | ± | 1.97 c | 107.86 | ± | 1.61 b |
|
| 70.00 | ± | 1.780 a | 65.05 | ± | 0.27 b | 59.55 | ± | 2.14 c |
|
| 6.48 | ± | 0.010 a | 2.86 | ± | 0.06 c | 5.81 | ± | 0.02 b |
|
| 1.35 | ± | 0.005 a | 0.75 | ± | 0.02 c | 0.77 | ± | 0.07 b |
|
| 0.21 | ± | 0.005 c | 0.83 | ± | 0.00 b | 3.79 | ± | 0.39 a |
All values are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Control: Non-fermented tomato juice beverage; PMO 08: Tomato juice fermented by L. plantarum PMO 08; Yogurt: Tomato juice fermented by yogurt starter culture containing Lactobacillus acidophilus, Streptococcus thermophilus, and Bifidobacterium lactis. a–c Values with different superscripts within the same row are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).