Literature DB >> 33142136

Carboxylic acids production and electrosynthetic microbial community evolution under different CO2 feeding regimens.

Paolo Dessì1, Carlos Sánchez2, Simon Mills2, Francesco Giuseppe Cocco3, Marco Isipato3, Umer Z Ijaz4, Gavin Collins2, Piet N L Lens2.   

Abstract

Microbial electrosynthesis (MES) is a potential technology for CO2 recycling, but insufficient information is available on the microbial interactions underpinning electrochemically-assisted reactions. In this study, a MES reactor was operated for 225 days alternately with bicarbonate or CO2 as carbon source, under batch or continuous feeding regimens, to evaluate the response of the microbial communities, and their productivity, to dynamic operating conditions. A stable acetic acid production rate of 9.68 g m-2 d-1, and coulombic efficiency up to 40%, was achieved with continuous CO2 sparging, higher than the rates obtained with bicarbonate (0.94 g m-2 d-1) and CO2 under fed-batch conditions (2.54 g m-2 d-1). However, the highest butyric acid production rate (0.39 g m-2 d-1) was achieved with intermittent CO2 sparging. The microbial community analyses focused on differential amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), allowing detection of ASVs significantly different across consecutive samples. This analysis, combined with co-occurence network analysis, and cyclic voltammetry, indicated that hydrogen-mediated acetogenesis was carried out by Clostridium, Eubacterium and Acetobacterium, whereas Oscillibacter and Caproiciproducens were involved in butyric acid production. The cathodic community was spatially inhomogeneous, with potential electrotrophs, such as Sulfurospirillum and Desulfovibrio, most prevalent near the current collector. The abundance of Sulfurospirillum positively correlated with that of Acetobacterium, supporting the syntrophic metabolism of both organisms.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioelectrochemistry; CO(2) electroreduction; Chain elongation; Cyclic voltammetry; Microbial electrosynthesis; Miseq sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33142136     DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2020.107686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  4 in total

1.  Qiliqiangxin Modulates the Gut Microbiota and NLRP3 Inflammasome to Protect Against Ventricular Remodeling in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Yingdong Lu; Mi Xiang; Laiyun Xin; Yang Zhang; Yuling Wang; Zihuan Shen; Li Li; Xiangning Cui
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 2.  A comparative analysis of biopolymer production by microbial and bioelectrochemical technologies.

Authors:  Brenda Alvarez Chavez; Vijaya Raghavan; Boris Tartakovsky
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  Propionate Production by Bioelectrochemically-Assisted Lactate Fermentation and Simultaneous CO2 Recycling.

Authors:  Marco Isipato; Paolo Dessì; Carlos Sánchez; Simon Mills; Umer Z Ijaz; Fabiano Asunis; Daniela Spiga; Giorgia De Gioannis; Michele Mascia; Gavin Collins; Aldo Muntoni; Piet N L Lens
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  A meta-analysis of acetogenic and methanogenic microbiomes in microbial electrosynthesis.

Authors:  Simon Mills; Paolo Dessì; Deepak Pant; Pau Farràs; William T Sloan; Gavin Collins; Umer Zeeshan Ijaz
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 8.462

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.