Literature DB >> 33141996

Landscape-scale differences among cities alter common species' responses to urbanization.

Mason Fidino1, Travis Gallo2, Elizabeth W Lehrer1, Maureen H Murray1, Cria A M Kay1, Heather A Sander3, Brandon MacDougall3, Carmen M Salsbury4,5, Travis J Ryan4,5, Julia L Angstmann5, J Amy Belaire6, Barbara Dugelby7, Christopher J Schell8, Theodore Stankowich9, Max Amaya9, David Drake10, Sheryl H Hursh11, Adam A Ahlers12, Jacque Williamson13, Laurel M Hartley14, Amanda J Zellmer15,16, Kelly Simon17, Seth B Magle1.   

Abstract

Understanding how biodiversity responds to urbanization is challenging, due in part to the single-city focus of most urban ecological research. Here, we delineate continent-scale patterns in urban species assemblages by leveraging data from a multi-city camera trap survey and quantify how differences in greenspace availability and average housing density among 10 North American cities relate to the distribution of eight widespread North American mammals. To do so, we deployed camera traps at 569 sites across these ten cities between 18 June and 14 August. Most data came from 2017, though some cities contributed 2016 or 2018 data if it was available. We found that the magnitude and direction of most species' responses to urbanization within a city were associated with landscape-scale differences among cities. For example, eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) responses to urbanization changed from negative to positive once the proportion of green space within a city was >~20%. Likewise, raccoon (Procyon lotor) and Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) responses to urbanization changed from positive to negative once the average housing density of a city exceeded about 700 housing units/km2 . We also found that local species richness within cities consistently declined with urbanization in only the more densely developed cities (>~700 housing units/km2 ). Given our results, it may therefore be possible to design cities to better support biodiversity and reduce the negative influence of urbanization on wildlife by, for example, increasing the amount of green space within a city. Additionally, it may be most important for densely populated cities to find innovative solutions to bolster wildlife resilience because they were the most likely to observe diversity losses of common urban species.
© 2020 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  camera trap; mammal; multi-city survey; occupancy; species richness; urbanization; wildlife

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33141996     DOI: 10.1002/eap.2253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Mammals adjust diel activity across gradients of urbanization.

Authors:  Travis Gallo; Mason Fidino; Brian Gerber; Adam A Ahlers; Julia L Angstmann; Max Amaya; Amy L Concilio; David Drake; Danielle Gay; Elizabeth W Lehrer; Maureen H Murray; Travis J Ryan; Colleen Cassady St Clair; Carmen M Salsbury; Heather A Sander; Theodore Stankowich; Jaque Williamson; J Amy Belaire; Kelly Simon; Seth B Magle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Downtown diet: a global meta-analysis of increased urbanization on the diets of vertebrate predators.

Authors:  Siria Gámez; Abigail Potts; Kirby L Mills; Aurelia A Allen; Allyson Holman; Peggy M Randon; Olivia Linson; Nyeema C Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Defining dual-axis landscape gradients of human influence for studying ecological processes.

Authors:  Benjamin Juan Padilla; Chris Sutherland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Public perception of urban wildlife during a COVID-19 stay-at-home quarantine order in Chicago.

Authors:  Maureen H Murray; Kaylee A Byers; Jacqueline Buckley; Elizabeth W Lehrer; Cria Kay; Mason Fidino; Seth B Magle; Danielle German
Journal:  Urban Ecosyst       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Parallel evolution of urban-rural clines in melanism in a widespread mammal.

Authors:  Bradley J Cosentino; James P Gibbs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.