Literature DB >> 33141461

Rates of Vascular Events in Patients With Migraine: A MarketScan® Database Retrospective Cohort Study.

Karminder Gill1, Victoria M Chia1, Rohini K Hernandez1, Marco Navetta1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the baseline rates of vascular events among people with migraine.
BACKGROUND: Several novel medications that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are approved to treat people with migraine. Given that the CGRP pathway also plays a role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis, determining the baseline rates of vascular events among people with migraine will help inform the safety of these novel medications.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients 18- to 64-year-old patients with migraine were identified from the MarketScan® database (January 2013-December 2017) and were categorized into 4 vascular risk categories: migraine with aura; and high, medium, and low vascular risk. Event rates (per 1000 person-years [PY]) for 19 vascular events were estimated overall, by risk category, and by baseline characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 1,195,696 patients with migraine, 4.8% (57,853/1,195,696) had migraine with aura, and 2.8% (33,949/1,195,696), 15.5% (184,782/1,195,696), and 77.9% (931,059/1,195,696) were at high, medium, and low risk of vascular events, respectively. Rates of ischemic stroke (per 1000 PY) were 5.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0, 5.2) overall, 8.6 (95% CI: 8.1, 9.1) for patients with migraine aura, 47.2 (95% CI: 45.3, 49.0) in the high-risk group, 9.4 (95% CI: 9.1, 9.7) in the medium-risk group, and 2.9 (95% CI: 2.9, 3.0) in the low-risk group. Rates of acute myocardial infarction (per 1000 PY) were 1.8 (95% CI: 1.8, 1.9) overall, 1.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 2.2) for patients with migraine aura, 14.0 (95% CI: 13.0, 14.9) in the high-risk group, 3.9 (95% CI: 3.7, 4.1) in the medium-risk group, and 1.1 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.1) in the low-risk group. High-risk patients had the highest rates of each of 19 evaluated vascular events, and rates were higher for men, older age groups, and those with higher comorbidity scores, medication usage, and medical utilization.
CONCLUSION: Our findings provide recent rates of vascular disease in patients with migraine. In the future, this information will be useful to help inform clinical risk:benefit decision making when assessing the use of therapies such as CGRP antagonists for migraine.
© 2020 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Headache Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular events; cerebrovascular events; headache; migraine; migraine aura; vascular events

Year:  2020        PMID: 33141461      PMCID: PMC7756746          DOI: 10.1111/head.14001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


calcitonin gene‐related peptide confidence interval incidence rate person‐years standard deviation

Introduction

There is growing evidence of an association between migraine and the risk of vascular events. The risk of hemorrhagic stroke, transient ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and unstable angina has been shown to be higher among people with migraine compared with those without migraine. In addition, several systematic reviews and meta‐analyses suggest that migraine with aura, which is experienced by approximately one‐third of people with migraine, may be a risk factor for ischemic stroke. , , , Associations between migraine and mortality due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events have also been observed. , Although stroke and acute coronary events, especially in older patients, remain a concern for clinicians, few studies have examined the risk of other significant vascular events, such as venous thromboembolism, peripheral artery disease, and congestive heart failure, in patients with migraine. In addition, some drugs used to treat migraine, such as triptans, may have vascular effects and appear to be avoided where possible in patients with cardiovascular risk. , Furthermore, newer preventive medications have a role in the calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) pathway which maintains cardiovascular homeostasis. Understanding the baseline rates of vascular events will provide valuable information against which to compare the safety of established migraine medications (such as triptans), as well as the safety of novel medications that target the CGRP pathway. We used data from a large US administrative claims database to descriptively provide more recent estimates of the burden of 19 vascular events among adults with migraine. The objective of our study was to estimate the rates of vascular events overall and in 4 different categories of patients with migraine, to give context to event rates observed with the real‐world use of migraine medications.

Methods

Study Design and Data Source

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified a cohort of patients with migraine from the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database (date range: January 01, 2013 to December 31, 2017). The MarketScan® medical claims database represents the medical experience of insured employees and their dependents, early retirees, COBRA continues, and Medicare‐eligible retirees with employer‐sponsored Medical Supplemental plans. There are approximately 25 million annual patients in the database from 1996 to 2017. The underlying insured population from which the data are drawn was geographically diverse across the United States (47% – South, 18% – North, 17% – West, and 20% – North Central), 52% of plan participants were male, and 89% were enrolled in fee‐for‐service plans. The MarketScan® database contains fully adjudicated eligibility, pharmacy, procedure, and medical claims data for patients enrolled in large US health plans. These databases provide physician, hospital, and prescription drug services data and capture medical claims or encounter data from all available healthcare sites, including inpatient hospitals, outpatient hospitals, emergency rooms, physicians’ offices, and surgery centers. The MarketScan® database is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant, and all patient data are de‐identified. Because identifying information cannot be linked back to the patients from whom the data were originally collected, the subsequent use of the data does not constitute human subject research requiring informed consent and does not require approval from an institutional review board. This study is based on an analysis of automated medical and prescription claims, in individuals with a confirmed age and gender categorization. Because claims are collected for the purpose of payment, we assume that diagnoses and prescriptions reported in claims data are a true and accurate reflection of the health status and medication and health service usage for an individual. For the serious migraine and vascular diagnoses and related medication usage considered here, the presence of an associated claim was interpreted as indicating that the procedure was conducted, the disease was present, or the drug was consumed; the absence of a claim indicated the opposite. Consequently, there were no missing data.

Study Population

The study sample was based on the available data in the MarketScan® claims database. Patients (18‐64 years) were included in the migraine cohort if they met any of the following definitions during the study period: ≥1 migraine diagnosis claim for a “non‐emergency” inpatient visit; ≥1 migraine diagnosis claim from an emergency room visit; ≥1 outpatient migraine diagnosis claim plus ≥1 acute migraine drug (triptan or ergot derivative) prescription claim within 180 days of each other; ≥2 outpatient migraine diagnoses between 7 and 180 days apart; or ≥2 acute migraine drug (triptan or ergot derivative) prescription claims between 7 and 180 days apart. The index date for inclusion in the cohort was the first date the patient met any of the migraine definitions. For definitions requiring 2 or more claims or 2 or more medication prescriptions, the index date was the first claims date or the first date for a prescription. In addition to meeting a migraine definition, patients were required to have 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy eligibility prior to the index date for assessing medical history. Patients with migraine were further categorized into 4 vascular risk categories (categories were not mutually exclusive) based on the presence of conditions prior to the index date: (1) migraine with aura (history of an aura diagnosis, irrespective of previous vascular events or risk factors for vascular events); (2) high risk of vascular events (history of any of the following 19 vascular events: ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, unspecified stroke, transient ischemic attack, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, other acute cerebrovascular events, other ischemic cerebrovascular events, acute myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, congestive heart failure, acute ventricular tachycardia, acute atrial fibrillation, Prinzmetal angina, unstable angina pectoris, other and unspecified angina pectoris, coronary revascularization, peripheral artery disease, or venous thromboembolism); (3) medium risk of vascular events (history of hypertension, type I diabetes, type II diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia, but no history of the 19 previously specified vascular events); and (4) low risk of vascular events (no history of migraine aura, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, or any of the 19 previously specified vascular events). These categories were chosen because they had either clinical relevance to migraine (eg, migraine with aura) or are known risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) codes were used to code baseline comorbidities and vascular outcomes from January 2013 to September 2015; ICD‐10‐CM codes were used from October 2015 to December 2017. To obtain equivalent ICD‐10‐CM codes for our study covariates, we used simple forward mapping from the ICD‐9‐CM definitions by referencing the 2017 General Equivalence Mappings. The ICD‐9‐CM and ICD‐10‐CM codes used to identify all vascular outcomes are presented in Supporting Table S1.

Outcome Assessments

We evaluated each of the 19 vascular events during the follow‐up period, overall, by vascular risk category, and by baseline patient characteristics. Person‐time at risk was evaluated separately for each vascular outcome starting from the index date and ending at the date of the first occurrence of a vascular outcome of interest, death, termination of enrollment in the health plan submitting information to the MarketScan® database, or the administrative end of the study on December 31, 2017.

Covariates

Patient characteristics were assessed during the baseline period and included demographics (gender and age [categories: 18‐24, 25‐34, 35‐44, 45‐54, 55‐64]), use of acute migraine medications (analgesics, ergotamines, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, opioids, and triptans), use of other medications of interest (antidepressants, antiepileptics, antihypertensives, anxiolytics, gastrointestinal medications, hormonal contraceptives, lipid‐lowering agents, migraine‐preventive treatments, and nonmigraine monoclonal antibodies), medical utilization (inpatient visits, emergency room visits, ambulatory visits), drug utilization (number of prescriptions), and medical history (anxiety, asthma, cancer [excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer], chronic kidney disease, constipation, Crohn’s disease, depression, rheumatoid arthritis, and comorbidity score). Comorbidity score was based on the Deyo adaptation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index for administrative claims data.

Statistical Analysis

To examine patient characteristics overall and within vascular risk categories, we used number (N) and percentages (%) to describe baseline patient characteristics such as nominal gender categories, dichotomous variables denoting the use of medications or presence of comorbidities, and ordinal variables such as categories of age, medical and drug utilization groupings, and comorbidity score groupings. Overall event rates as well as event rates stratified by vascular risk categories, demographic characteristics, medical history, and medication usage, were calculated as the number of incident events during the follow‐up period divided by the total person‐time at risk. All event rates, presented per 1000 person‐years (PY), were estimated using a generalized linear model based on the Poisson distribution, and were unadjusted for any baseline patient characteristics. We used propensity score analyses to match patients at medium risk of vascular events with those at low risk of vascular events. Alternative matching strategies, such as matching patients at high vascular risk to patients at low vascular risk, were not undertaken due to sample size considerations and low expected match rates between the sicker patients in the high vascular risk group and the relatively healthier patients in the low vascular risk group. The propensity scores were generated by a multivariable logistic regression model with group assignment as the dependent variable. The independent variables included in the propensity score model were demographics (age and gender), medication usage, medical and drug utilization metrics, and nonvascular medical history (anxiety, asthma, cancer [excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer], chronic kidney disease, constipation, depression, rheumatoid arthritis, and comorbidity score). Vascular events during the baseline period were excluded from the propensity score model because they are not relevant for migraine patients at medium or low risk of vascular events. Similarly, risk factors for vascular disease (diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia) were excluded from the propensity score model because they are only relevant for migraine patients who are at medium risk for vascular events. Caliper matching, in which patients from both study groups were ordered by their propensity score and randomly matched to individuals in the alternate study group, was employed for matching. The caliper, which specifies the maximum distance in the propensity score that should be used to create matched sets, was set to 0.01. We used a 1:1 matching ratio for these analyses. Ischemic stroke rates were then estimated in the matched migraine population. All analyses were conducted using SAS v9.2 (Cary, NC).

Results

Patient Characteristics

Out of 82,612,939 individuals enrolled in the MarketScan® claims database between January 01, 2013 and December 31, 2017, a total of 1,195,696 (1.4%) met the study criteria for inclusion in the migraine cohort. Of these, 57,853 (4.8%) had migraine with aura, 33,949 (2.8%) were at high risk of vascular events, 184,782 (15.5%) were at medium risk of vascular events, and 931,059 (77.9%) were at low risk of vascular events (Table 1). Overall, 82.5% of patients were female, and 17.7% were 55‐64 years of age. Compared with other groups, patients at high risk of vascular events were more likely to be men (25.9% of the overall population), older (38.1% were at least 55 years old), sicker (51.2% with a comorbidity score of 1 or greater), and hospitalized (54.5% with at least 1 inpatient visit in the prior calendar year). In addition, 51.3% of patients at high risk of vascular events were hypertensive, 17.9% were diabetic, and 9.4% had a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia during the baseline period (data not presented). The characteristics of patients with migraine with aura were similar to patients at low risk of vascular events, but with a few notable differences: patients with migraine with aura were (1) more likely to be hospitalized (11.5% vs 7.4%) or visit emergency rooms (30.8% vs 14.5%); and (2) were sicker (comorbidity score >1 in 28.3% vs 19.6% of patients) (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Migraine, Overall, and by Vascular Risk Categories†

Characteristic, n (%)Overall (N = 1,195,696)Migraine With Aura (N = 57,853)High Vascular Risk (N = 33,949)Medium Vascular Risk (N = 184,782)Low Vascular Risk (N = 931,059)
Female986,115 (82.5)48,252 (83.4)25,142 (74.1)144,230 (78.1)777,870 (83.5)
Age (years)
18‐24139,843 (11.7)6407 (11.1)917 (2.7)3321 (1.8)129,415 (13.9)
25‐34218,127 (18.2)11,454 (19.8)2581 (7.6)13,904 (7.5)191,181 (20.5)
35‐44310,195 (25.9)15,757 (27.2)6372 (18.8)40,222 (21.8)250,537 (26.9)
45‐54315,657 (26.4)14,813 (25.6)11,139 (32.8)64,961 (35.2)228,883 (24.6)
55‐64211,874 (17.7)9422 (16.3)12,940 (38.1)62,374 (33.8)131,043 (14.1)
Acute migraine medications
Analgesics111,565 (9.3)7343 (12.7)4871 (14.3)22,807 (12.3)78,480 (8.4)
Ergots5417 (0.5)774 (1.3)175 (0.5)950 (0.5)3693 (0.4)
Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs341,372 (28.6)16,364 (28.3)11,394 (33.6)67,702 (36.6)249,990 (26.9)
Opioids527,004 (44.1)25,907 (44.8)22,736 (67.0)107,259 (58.0)377,859 (40.6)
Triptans354,965 (29.7)15,149 (26.2)6131 (18.1)47,729 (25.8)288,586 (31.0)
Other medications
Antidepressants434,712 (36.4)20,270 (35.0)15,813 (46.6)83,600 (45.2)319,452 (34.3)
Antiepileptics298,552 (25.0)17,177 (29.7)14,252 (42.0)61,152 (33.1)209,764 (22.5)
Antihypertensives321,253 (26.9)15,647 (27.0)18,899 (55.7)127,754 (69.1)165,743 (17.8)
Anxiolytics334,771 (28.0)16,239 (28.1)14,370 (42.3)69,261 (37.5)238,928 (25.7)
Gastrointestinal medications532,853 (44.6)24,729 (42.7)21,003 (61.9)107,656 (58.3)385,660 (41.4)
Hormonal contraceptives228,910 (19.1)9825 (17.0)2338 (6.9)15,927 (8.6)201,400 (21.6)
Lipid‐lowering agents149,241 (12.5)6438 (11.1)12,399 (36.5)62,096 (33.6)71,716 (7.7)
Migraine‐preventive treatments 560,241 (46.9)27,440 (47.4)22,568 (66.5)122,371 (66.2)394,140 (42.3)
Nonmigraine monoclonal antibodies62,095 (5.2)3120 (5.4)3329 (9.8)16,010 (8.7)40,648 (4.4)
Medical utilization
Inpatient visits
01,073,598 (89.8)51,189 (88.5)15,450 (45.5)153,939 (83.3)862,141 (92.6)
1‐2100,238 (8.4)5417 (9.4)12,859 (37.9)24,514 (13.3)59,556 (6.4)
3+21,860 (1.8)1247 (2.2)5640 (16.6)6329 (3.4)9362 (1.0)
Emergency room visits
01,000,480 (83.7)40,077 (69.3)20,842 (61.4)145,525 (78.8)795,909 (85.5)
1‐2167,503 (14.0)13,927 (24.1)9958 (29.3)32,517 (17.6)118,439 (12.7)
3+27,713 (2.3)3849 (6.7)3149 (9.3)6740 (3.6)16,711 (1.8)
Drug utilization
Number of prescriptions
0178,458 (14.9)13,520 (23.4)5169 (15.2)24,715 (13.4)137,599 (14.8)
1‐267,388 (5.6)2612 (4.5)591 (1.7)2362 (1.3)61,991 (6.7)
3+949,850 (79.4)41,721 (72.1)28,189 (83.0)157,705 (85.3)731,469 (78.6)
Medical history
Comorbidity score
≤0943,462 (78.9)41,479 (71.7)16,546 (48.7)144,439 (78.2)748,915 (80.4)
1179,411 (15.0)11,356 (19.6)6184 (18.2)23,329 (12.6)140,590 (15.1)
2‐360,016 (5.0)4227 (7.3)6964 (20.5)13,426 (7.3)36,868 (4.0)
4+12,807 (1.1)791 (1.4)4255 (12.5)3588 (1.9)4686 (0.5)
Anxiety119,604 (10.0)7706 (13.3)5860 (17.3)25,080 (13.6)83,781 (9.0)
Asthma47,352 (4.0)3578 (6.2)3714 (10.9)12,791 (6.9)28,989 (3.1)
Cancer, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer22,663 (1.9)1076 (1.9)1985 (5.8)6126 (3.3)13,881 (1.5)
Chronic kidney disease16,082 (1.3)817 (1.4)3333 (9.8)7513 (4.1)4989 (0.5)
Constipation16,196 (1.4)1399 (2.4)1200 (3.5)3789 (2.1)10,549 (1.1)
Crohn's disease5298 (0.4)280 (0.5)326 (1.0)1043 (0.6)3730 (0.4)
Depression90,689 (7.6)5052 (8.7)4837 (14.2)19,955 (10.8)62,444 (6.7)
Rheumatoid arthritis11,368 (1.0)621 (1.1)850 (2.5)3339 (1.8)6801 (0.7)

The 4 vascular risk categories are not mutually exclusive.

Carisoprodol, cyproheptadine, guanfacine, memantine, methysergide, milnacipran, tizanidine.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients With Migraine, Overall, and by Vascular Risk Categories† The 4 vascular risk categories are not mutually exclusive. Carisoprodol, cyproheptadine, guanfacine, memantine, methysergide, milnacipran, tizanidine.

Ischemic Stroke Rates

Overall, 11,175 patients experienced an ischemic stroke during the follow‐up period (incidence rate [IR] = 5.1 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.0, 5.2] per 1000 PY; Table 2). Rates of ischemic stroke were 2.9 (95% CI: 2.9, 3.0) in the low‐risk group, 9.4 (95% CI: 9.1, 9.7) in the medium‐risk group, and 47.2 (95% CI: 45.3, 49.0) in the high‐risk group. The rate of ischemic stroke for patients with migraine with aura was 8.6 (95% CI: 8.1, 9.1). Rates of ischemic stroke were higher in men (IR = 7.5 [95% CI: 7.2, 7.8]) than in women (IR = 4.7 [95% CI: 4.6, 4.8]) and increased with age, from 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.5) in the 18‐ to 24‐year age group, 2.5 (95% CI: 2.3, 2.7) in the 25‐ to 34‐year age group, 4.1 (95% CI: 3.9, 4.2) in the 35‐ to 44‐year age group, and 6.1 (95% CI: 5.9, 6.3) in the 45‐ to 54‐year age group, to 9.5 (95% CI: 9.2, 9.8) in the 55‐ to 64‐year age group (Fig. 1A and Supporting Table S2). These patterns held true across all risk categories.
Table 2

Event Rates (Per 1000 Person‐Years) for Selected Outcomes in Patients With Migraine, Overall, and by Vascular Risk Categories†

Vascular EventOverallMigraine With AuraHigh Vascular RiskMedium Vascular RiskLow Vascular Risk
No. of EventsPYs at RiskRate (95% CI)No. of EventsPYs at RiskRate (95% CI)No. of EventsPYs at RiskRate (95% CI)No. of EventsPYs at RiskRate (95% CI)No. of EventsPYs at RiskRate (95% CI)
Cerebrovascular events
Ischemic stroke11,1752,177,7775.1 (5.0, 5.2)994115,5538.6 (8.1, 9.1)260355,20947.2 (45.3, 49.0)3113331,6679.4 (9.1, 9.7)49821,698,8492.9 (2.9, 3.0)
Hemorrhagic stroke21812,190,5001.0 (1.0, 1.0)95116,5730.8 (0.7, 1.0)46758,0948.0 (7.3, 8.8)482335,3011.4 (1.3, 1.6)11831,704,5710.7 (0.7, 0.7)
Unspecified stroke13,3412,174,4056.1 (6.0, 6.2)1160115,20210.1 (9.5, 10.7)367353,49068.7 (66.5, 70.9)3503331,06610.6 (10.2, 10.9)56461,697,8933.3 (3.2, 3.4)
Transient ischemic attack10,2922,177,4824.7 (4.6, 4.8)973115,4708.4 (7.9, 9.0)224955,29940.7 (39.0, 42.4)2842331,7028.6 (8.3, 8.9)47381,698,4462.8 (2.7, 2.9)
Subarachnoid hemorrhage14072,191,4480.6 (0.6, 0.7)64116,5820.6 (0.4, 0.7)39858,1416.9 (6.2, 7.5)300335,4890.9 (0.8, 1.0)6791,705,2670.4 (0.4, 0.4)
Intracerebral hemorrhage17722,191,1080.8 (0.8, 0.9)87116,5710.8 (0.6, 0.9)46658,0768.0 (7.3, 8.8)381335,4431.1 (1.0, 1.3)8811,705,0540.5 (0.5, 0.6)
Other acute cerebrovascular55732,184,2772.6 (2.5, 2.6)429116,0413.7 (3.4, 4.1)1,68955,99430.2 (28.7, 31.6)1419333,6734.3 (4.0, 4.5)23121,702,2611.4 (1.3, 1.4)
Other ischemic cerebrovascular30802,189,6431.4 (1.4, 1.5)312116,3252.7 (2.4, 3.0)84357,72614.6 (13.6, 15.6)946334,7212.8 (2.7, 3.0)11751,704,7460.7 (0.7, 0.7)
Cardiovascular events
Acute myocardial infarction40112,188,3221.8 (1.8, 1.9)226116,3801.9 (1.7, 2.2)80757,77714.0 (13.0, 14.9)1296334,3023.9 (3.7, 4.1)18131,703,7801.1 (1.0, 1.1)
Myocardial ischemia23972,189,9811.1 (1.1, 1.1)143116,4651.2 (1.0, 1.4)99757,22917.4 (16.3, 18.5)678334,9682.0 (1.9, 2.2)6781,705,2460.4 (0.4, 0.4)
Congestive heart failure96042,180,4364.4 (4.3, 4.5)542115,9154.7 (4.3, 5.1)362753,57167.7 (65.5, 69.9)2915332,1108.8 (8.5, 9.1)28781,702,3971.7 (1.6, 1.8)
Acute ventricular tachycardia22052,190,3691.0 (1.0, 1.1)123116,5101.1 (0.9, 1.2)76157,62713.2 (12.3, 14.1)500335,2061.5 (1.4, 1.6)8861,705,0200.5 (0.5, 0.6)
Acute atrial fibrillation87512,179,7114.0 (3.9, 4.1)504115,8874.4 (4.0, 4.7)384152,23773.5 (71.2, 75.9)1859333,2515.6 (5.3, 5.8)28761,701,9091.7 (1.6, 1.8)
Prinzmetal angina5672,192,6260.3 (0.2, 0.3)58116,5750.5 (0.4, 0.6)16258,4542.8 (2.3, 3.2)130335,7250.4 (0.3, 0.5)2531,705,8990.2 (0.1, 0.2)
Unstable angina pectoris45462,187,2032.1 (2.0, 2.1)273116,2782.4 (2.1, 2.6)104057,28418.2 (17.1, 19.3)1665333,6785.0 (4.8, 5.2)17571,703,7721.0 (1.0, 1.1)
Other and unspecified angina pectoris54002,185,5662.5 (2.4, 2.5)395116,0633.4 (3.1, 3.7)102357,20117.9 (16.8, 19.0)1957333,0495.9 (5.6, 6.1)22611,702,9781.3 (1.3, 1.4)
Coronary revascularization21632,189,4031.0 (1.0, 1.0)117116,4331.0 (0.8, 1.2)37958,1176.5 (5.9, 7.2)615334,8241.8 (1.7, 2.0)11011,704,0100.7 (0.6, 0.7)
Peripheral artery disease21,2772,163,1379.8 (9.7, 10.0)1284114,74111.2 (10.6, 11.8)393453,06974.1 (71.8, 76.5)7103326,11721.8 (21.3, 22.3)96241,692,2915.7 (5.6, 5.8)
Venous thromboembolism99212,179,9494.6 (4.5, 4.6)640115,7695.5 (5.1, 6.0)223755,60440.2 (38.6, 41.9)2347332,8937.1 (6.8, 7.3)50301,699,2823.0 (2.9, 3.0)

Rate is defined as the number of events divided by the number of PYs at risk.

The 4 vascular risk categories are not mutually exclusive.

CI = confidence interval; PY = person‐years.

Fig. 1

Incidence rates of (A) ischemic stroke and (B) acute myocardial infarction by gender and age group. CI = confidence interval.

Event Rates (Per 1000 Person‐Years) for Selected Outcomes in Patients With Migraine, Overall, and by Vascular Risk Categories† Rate is defined as the number of events divided by the number of PYs at risk. The 4 vascular risk categories are not mutually exclusive. CI = confidence interval; PY = person‐years. Incidence rates of (A) ischemic stroke and (B) acute myocardial infarction by gender and age group. CI = confidence interval. For medication usage, rates of ischemic stroke were highest among patients taking lipid‐lowering agents (IR = 10.4 [95% CI: 10.0, 10.7]). For patients taking acute migraine medications, rates ranged from 1.8 (95% CI: 1.7, 1.9) for triptans to 6.3 (95% CI: 6.2, 6.5) for opioids (Supporting Table S2). High rates of ischemic stroke were also evident among patients with high medical utilization, that is, those with at least 3 inpatient visits (IR = 28.2 [95% CI: 26.5, 29.9]) or at least 3 emergency room visits (IR = 18.9 [95% CI: 17.6, 20.2]) during the baseline period. In addition, rates of ischemic stroke were higher among those with a comorbidity score of at least 4 (IR = 30.9 [95% CI: 28.6, 33.2]) than those with a comorbidity score of 0 or less (IR = 4.4 [95% CI: 4.3, 4.5]). When considering all comorbidities, the highest rates were among patients with chronic kidney disease (IR = 25.3 [95% CI: 23.4, 27.2]) (Supporting Table S2).

Acute Myocardial Infarction Rates

The overall rate of acute myocardial infarction was 1.8 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 1.8, 1.9) (Table 2). Rates of acute myocardial infarction were 1.1 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.1) in the low vascular risk group, 3.9 (95% CI: 3.7, 4.1) in the medium vascular risk group, and 14.0 (95% CI: 13.0, 14.9) in the high vascular risk group. The rate for patients with migraine with aura was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 2.2), which is similar to that in the overall migraine population. Rates of acute myocardial infarction were higher among men (IR = 3.5 [95% CI: 3.3, 3.7]) than in women (IR = 1.5 [95% CI: 1.4, 1.6]) and increased with age, from 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.4) in the 18‐ to 24‐year age group to 4.3 (95% CI: 4.1, 4.5) in the 55‐ to 64‐year age group (Fig. 1B and Supporting Table S3). Similar patterns were seen across all vascular risk categories. As with ischemic stroke event rates, rates of acute myocardial infarction were highest among patients taking lipid‐lowering agents (IR = 4.6 [95% CI: 4.3, 4.8]). For patients taking acute migraine medications, rates ranged from 1.1 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.2) for triptans to 2.5 (95% CI: 2.4, 2.6) for opioids (Supporting Table S3). Patients with high medication usage and high medical utilization had relatively high rates of acute myocardial infarction. Furthermore, patients with a comorbidity score of at least 4 had a higher rate of acute myocardial infarction (IR = 12.7 [95% CI: 11.3, 14.2]) than patients with a comorbidity score of 0 or less (IR = 1.5 [95% CI: 1.4, 1.6]) (Supporting Table S3).

Other Vascular Event Rates

We evaluated the burden of 17 additional vascular events (Table 2). Overall rates of cerebrovascular events (per 1000 PY) ranged from 0.6 (95% CI: 0.6, 0.7) for subarachnoid hemorrhage to 6.1 (95% CI: 6.0, 6.2) for unspecified stroke, and overall rates of cardiovascular events ranged from 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.3) for Prinzmetal angina to 9.8 (95% CI: 9.7, 10.0) for peripheral artery disease. Again, patients at high risk of vascular events had the highest rates of each cerebrovascular or cardiovascular event. Rates of hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage were lower among migraine patients with aura than patients at medium risk of vascular events, but rates for the remaining cerebrovascular events were similar between the 2 groups. In contrast, rates of each cardiovascular event, except for Prinzmetal angina, were lower among migraine patients with aura than patients at medium risk of vascular events (Table 2). Similar to rates of ischemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction, rates of other vascular events were higher for men compared with women and for older age groups compared with younger age groups (Supporting Table S4). For example, when comparing men and women in the oldest age group (55‐64 years), respectively, the rates of cardiovascular events per 1000 PY (95% CI) were 15.6 (14.7, 16.5) and 9.6 (9.2, 9.9) for congestive heart failure, 30.8 (29.6, 32.1) and 22.6 (22.0, 23.1) for peripheral artery disease, 4.7 (4.2, 5.2) and 1.4 (1.2, 1.5) for coronary revascularization, and 9.3 (8.6, 9.9) and 6.3 (6.0, 6.6) for venous thromboembolism.

Matched Analyses

In the overall migraine cohort, 184,782 patients were identified as having medium risk of vascular events and 931,059 were identified as having low risk of vascular events. Propensity score overlap before matching is shown in Figure 2A. A total of 148,588 patients in each group were successfully matched based on baseline demographic characteristics, medication usage, healthcare utilization, and medical history items. In matched patients, the standardized difference for all variables included in the propensity score model was less than 0.10 (Table 3), and there was a good overlap in the propensity score (Fig. 2B). The rate of ischemic stroke was 13.6 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 12.9, 14.2) in the medium‐risk group and 7.4 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 7.0, 7.9) in the corresponding matched low‐risk group (data not presented).
Fig. 2

Propensity score* overlap before (A) and after (B) matching in patients with migraine at medium risk of cardiovascular events vs those at low risk of cardiovascular events. *The propensity score is the probability of group assignment, conditional on measured baseline covariates.

Table 3

Distribution of Baseline Covariates Among Migraine Patients With Medium vs Low Vascular Risk, by Matching Status

CovariateBefore Propensity Score MatchingAfter Propensity Score Matching
Medium Vascular Risk Group (N = 184,782)Low Vascular Risk Group (N = 931,059)Standardized DifferenceMedium Vascular Risk Group (N = 148,588)Low Vascular Risk Group (N = 148,588)Standardized Difference
Demographics, n (%)
Gender
Female144,230 (78.1)777,870 (83.6)−0.14118,316 (79.6)118,784 (79.9)−0.008
Male40,552 (22.0)153,189 (16.5)0.1430,272 (20.4)29,804 (20.1)0.008
Age (years)
18‐243321 (1.8)129,415 (13.9)−0.4623215 (2.2)5203 (3.5)−0.081
25‐3413,904 (7.5)191,181 (20.5)−0.38113,335 (9.0)12,877 (8.7)0.011
35‐4440,222 (21.8)250,537 (26.9)−0.12036,613 (24.6)31,362 (21.1)0.084
45‐5464,961 (35.2)228,883 (24.6)0.23352,800 (35.5)50,779 (34.2)0.029
55‐6462,374 (33.8)131,043 (14.1)0.47442,625 (28.7)48,367 (32.6)−0.084
Time period
201361,917 (33.5)332,099 (35.7)−0.04551,684 (34.8)53,103 (35.7)−0.02
201443,023 (23.3)210,389 (22.6)0.01634,380 (23.1)34,610 (23.3)−0.004
201529,726 (16.1)141,637 (15.2)0.02423,089 (15.5)22,282 (15.0)0.015
201627,566 (14.9)134,212 (14.4)0.01421,436 (14.4)21,081 (14.2)0.007
201722,550 (12.2)112,722 (12.1)0.00317,999 (12.1)17,512 (11.8)0.010
Medication usage, n (%)
Antihypertensives128,783 (69.7)162,107 (17.4)1.24193,140 (62.7)94,159 (63.4)−0.014
Gastrointestinal medications106,843 (57.8)382,470 (41.1)0.34081,011 (54.5)80,751 (54.4)0.004
Hormonal contraceptives14,983 (8.1)192,971 (20.7)−0.36514,137 (9.5)13,833 (9.3)0.007
Lipid‐lowering agents61,293 (33.2)69,822 (7.5)0.67337,516 (25.3)36,933 (24.9)0.009
Nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs66,394 (35.9)246,531 (26.5)0.20550,481 (34.0)49,767 (33.5)0.010
Nonmigraine monoclonal antibodies15,979 (8.7)40,534 (4.4)0.17511,261 (7.6)11,490 (7.7)−0.006
Opioids106,897 (57.9)376,832 (40.5)0.35380,880 (54.4)80,530 (54.2)0.005
Triptans47,139 (25.5)285,879 (30.7)−0.11641,281 (27.8)42,412 (28.5)−0.017
Medical utilization, mean (SD)
Number of ambulatory visits21.4 (18.4)13.2 (14.3)0.50119.6 (16.3)19.9 (20.7)−0.016
Number of emergency room visits0.4 (1.3)0.2 (0.9)0.1530.4 (1.1)0.4 (1.4)0.006
Number of inpatient hospital stays0.4 (1.8)0.1 (1.0)0.1660.3 (1.5)0.3 (2.1)0.012
Drug utilization, mean (SD)
Number of unique generic medications dispensed10.7 (8.0)6.5 (5.8)0.6029.7 (7.6)9.7 (7.0)0.012
Number of unique drug classes dispensed9.6 (6.8)6.0 (5.1)0.6058.7 (6.6)8.7 (6.0)−0.002
Number of outpatient pharmacy dispensings36.1 (33.8)19.0 (22.1)0.59932.1 (31.6)31.8 (29.6)0.008
Medical history, mean (SD)
Comorbidity score0.1 (1.2)0.2 (0.7)−0.1680.1 (1.2)0.2 (0.8)−0.038
Anxiety28,130 (15.2)90,392 (9.7)0.16820,932 (14.1)21,206 (14.3)−0.005
Asthma16,375 (8.9)38,245 (4.1)0.19411,061 (7.4)11,001 (7.4)0.002
Chronic kidney disease7590 (4.1)5085 (0.6)0.2383788 (2.6)3301 (2.2)0.022
Cancer (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer)6528 (3.5)14,840 (1.6)0.1234513 (3.0)4719 (3.2)−0.008
Constipation5065 (2.7)13,296 (1.4)0.0923590 (2.4)3630 (2.4)−0.002
Depression20,653 (11.2)64,199 (6.9)0.15015,303 (10.3)15,562 (10.5)−0.006
Rheumatoid arthritis3354 (1.8)6840 (0.7)0.0962261 (1.5)2286 (1.5)−0.001

SD = standard deviation.

Propensity score* overlap before (A) and after (B) matching in patients with migraine at medium risk of cardiovascular events vs those at low risk of cardiovascular events. *The propensity score is the probability of group assignment, conditional on measured baseline covariates. Distribution of Baseline Covariates Among Migraine Patients With Medium vs Low Vascular Risk, by Matching Status SD = standard deviation.

Discussion

In this study, 1,195,696 adult patients with migraine enrolled in the MarketScan® database were followed for more than 2 million PY for the occurrence of 19 vascular events. This real‐world assessment of vascular events in insured patients with migraine provides a baseline risk assessment against which the risks of newer agents, such as inhibitors of the CGRP pathway, can be compared in future analyses. The highest rates for all vascular outcomes were observed among patients identified as being at high risk of vascular events during the baseline period. Rates of vascular events also increased with age and were higher for men than for women. In the overall US population, the IR of acute myocardial infarction was ~2.5 per 1000 PY and the IR of ischemic stroke was ~1.6 per 1000 PY. In contrast, the IR of acute myocardial infarction observed in this large, diverse migraine population was 1.8 per 1000 PY. Previous studies in more narrowly defined migraine populations receiving prophylactic treatment showed lower rates of acute myocardial infarction. In a study that matched people with migraine to people without migraine, the estimated overall myocardial infarction rate was 1.45 per 1000 PY in patients with migraine, with rates ranging from 1.2 per 1000 PY for current users of triptan medications to 2.2 per 1000 PY for current users of ergot alkaloids. In a more recent propensity‐score matched analysis of people who initiated topiramate vs other prophylactic migraine medications, the myocardial infarction rates ranged from 0.8 per 1000 PY to 1.1 per 1000 PY, depending on the matched comparator. Myocardial infarction rates in patients initiating other preventive migraine medications were higher: antidepressants (1.4 per 1000 PY); anticonvulsants (1.4 per 1000 PY); cardiovascular treatments (1.8 per 1000 PY); and other prophylactic treatments (2.0 per 1000 PY). Likewise, we observed a higher overall ischemic stroke rate (5.1 per 1000 PY) in our broad migraine population when compared with previous findings in more restricted migraine populations. , Differences in rates may also be explained by changes in coding over time. Although we used the 2017 General Equivalence Mappings to map ICD‐9‐CM definitions to ICD‐10‐CM definitions, an approach that has demonstrated good performance for 3 cardiovascular outcomes (ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and angioedema), , more specific identification of outcomes in the ICD‐10‐CM era may result in differences in detection rates when compared with the ICD‐9‐CM era. Migraine with aura compared with migraine without aura has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, , , , although the literature is inconsistent. The IR of ischemic stroke was higher in migraine patients with aura than the overall migraine population (8.6 vs 5.1 per 1000 PY, respectively). In contrast, we found that the IR of acute myocardial infarction in migraine patients with aura was similar to the rate in the overall migraine population (1.8 vs 1.9 per 1000 PY, respectively). For events overall, migraine patients with aura had a vascular disease burden similar to those at medium risk of cerebrovascular events, but a lower disease burden for selected cardiovascular events (including acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, and peripheral artery disease). These findings are likely partially explained by the fact that the migraine aura group comprised all patients diagnosed with aura, including those with a history of vascular events or a history of risk factors for vascular events. Prior to propensity score matching, the ischemic stroke rate was 9.4 per 1000 PY in migraine patients at medium risk of vascular events and 2.9 per 1000 PY in those at low risk of vascular events. After matching based on baseline demographic characteristics, medication usage, healthcare utilization, and medical history, the ischemic stroke rate was 13.6 per 1000 PY and 7.4 per 1000 PY in the matched medium‐risk and low‐risk vascular groups, respectively. Except for diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the medium and low vascular risk groups. As in the general population, migraine patients with risk factors for vascular disease (ie, diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia) experience higher ischemic stroke rates when compared with migraine patients with no risk factors for vascular disease but who are otherwise similar with respect to baseline characteristics. , This study has important limitations. First, we used the MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database for these analyses because most migraine patients are younger than 65 years. The drawback of using a claims database for the study of migraine is that individuals who are uninsured, institutionalized, 65 years of age or older, or covered by Medicaid insurance are under‐represented in claims data. Second, a previously validated algorithm used to identify migraine patients in administrative claims data had a relatively high specificity but low sensitivity, meaning that a high proportion of people with migraine was missed. Assuming our migraine algorithm has similar performance statistics, the population analyzed in our study most likely represented patients seeking medical care for their headache and may not have included those who did not receive medications or diagnostic coding for migraine during their medical visit. Indeed, the medically insured population in this study is likely skewed toward individuals with migraine of sufficient severity to warrant medical intervention, but this is the most relevant population for physicians who are deciding to treat patients with novel medications such as monoclonal antibodies that target the CGRP pathway. Also, importantly, it is unknown whether the severity of migraine symptoms prompting more healthcare utilization would be expected to have any impact on cardiovascular risk. Third, our population had a higher percentage of females (82.5%) than reported for populations in large epidemiological studies of migraine (74.4‐79.9%), which may have had an effect on the baseline rate of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction in our study. Fourth, we used a broad categorization for medications of interest (eg, the nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug category included medications with and without antiplatelet characteristics), which prevented us from evaluating the potential effects of other groupings on vascular event rates. Fifth, we note that the results presented here are descriptive only, and are not intended for causal interpretation. Finally, we employed an intention‐to‐treat approach when estimating event rates, such that patients remained in the same vascular risk category assigned on the index date during the entirety of their follow‐up. An alternative approach, the per‐protocol analysis, would have censored individuals when they moved to a higher vascular risk category. The impact of using the intention‐to‐treat approach to estimate event rates is likely small, with rates slightly higher in the medium and low vascular risk categories than those that would have occurred with the per‐protocol approach.

Conclusion

In summary, our data provide updated evidence of the burden of vascular disease in patients with migraine, overall, by risk categories, and by baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Understanding the baseline rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events is particularly important among patients with migraine, as comorbid conditions and polypharmacy are common in this population. These baseline rates can help contextualize postmarketing data that arise after new classes of medications for the treatment of migraine are initiated in this population. In particular, our findings may be used to inform future assessments of the clinical risk:benefit of using newer therapies for migraine such as CGRP antagonists.

Statement of Authorship

Category 1 (a) Conception and Design Karminder Gill, Victoria M. Chia, Rohini K. Hernandez (b) Acquisition of Data Karminder Gill, Victoria M. Chia, Rohini K. Hernandez (c) Analysis and Interpretation of Data Karminder Gill, Victoria M. Chia, Rohini K. Hernandez, Marco Navetta Category 2 (a) Drafting the Manuscript Karminder Gill, Victoria M. Chia, Rohini K. Hernandez (b) Revising It for Intellectual Content Karminder Gill, Victoria M. Chia, Rohini K. Hernandez, Marco Navetta Category 3 (a) Final Approval of the Completed Manuscript Karminder Gill, Victoria M. Chia, Rohini K. Hernandez, Marco Navetta Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Migraine--current understanding and treatment.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Richard B Lipton; Michel D Ferrari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Migraine and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Markus Schürks; Pamela M Rist; Robert E Shapiro; Tobias Kurth
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  Early impact of the ICD-10-CM transition on selected health outcomes in 13 electronic health care databases in the United States.

Authors:  Catherine A Panozzo; Tiffany S Woodworth; Emily C Welch; Ting-Ying Huang; Qoua L Her; Kevin Haynes; Catherine Rogers; Talia J Menzin; Max Ehrmann; Katherine E Freitas; Nicole R Haug; Sengwee Toh
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Assessing the impact of the new ICD-10-CM coding system on pharmacoepidemiologic studies-An application to the known association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angioedema.

Authors:  Catherine A Panozzo; Emily C Welch; Tiffany S Woodworth; Ting-Ying Huang; Qoua L Her; Joshua J Gagne; Jenny W Sun; Catherine Rogers; Talia J Menzin; Max Ehrmann; Katherine E Freitas; Nicole R Haug; Sengwee Toh
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 6.  Migraine and the risk of stroke: an updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Xianming Hu; Yingchun Zhou; Hongyang Zhao; Cheng Peng
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Migraine headache and ischemic stroke risk: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  June T Spector; Susan R Kahn; Miranda R Jones; Monisha Jayakumar; Deepan Dalal; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Severe vascular events in migraine patients.

Authors:  Priscilla Velentgas; J Alexander Cole; Jingping Mo; Carolyn R Sikes; Alexander M Walker
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 9.  Adverse cardiovascular events associated with triptans and ergotamines for treatment of migraine: systematic review of observational studies.

Authors:  G Roberto; E Raschi; C Piccinni; V Conti; L Vignatelli; R D'Alessandro; F De Ponti; E Poluzzi
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 6.292

10.  Triptan use as a function of cardiovascular risk. A population-based study.

Authors:  Marcelo E Bigal; Wendy Golden; Dawn Buse; Ya-Ting Chen; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.887

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular Disease and Migraine: Are the New Treatments Safe?

Authors:  Jennifer Robblee; Lauren K Harvey
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-06-25

Review 2.  Risk of Stroke in Migrainous Women, a Hidden Association: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samia E Saddik; Sarah N Dawood; Ahmad M Rabih; Ahmad Niaj; Aishwarya Raman; Manish Uprety; Maria Calero; Maria Resah B Villanueva; Narges Joshaghani; Nicole Villa; Omar Badla; Raman Goit; Lubna Mohammed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.