Heather J Baer1,2,3, Ronen Rozenblum1,2, Barbara A De La Cruz1, E John Orav1,2,3, Matthew Wien1, Nyryan V Nolido1, Kristina Metzler4, Katherine D McManus5, Florencia Halperin2,6, Louis J Aronne7,8, Guadalupe Minero7, Jason P Block1,2,9, David W Bates1,2,3. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Center for Clinical Investigation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Nutrition, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Intellihealth Inc, San Francisco, California. 8. Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 9. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: Online programs may help with weight loss but have not been widely implemented in routine primary care. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a combined intervention, including an online weight management program plus population health management, with the online program only and with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized trial with enrollment from July 19, 2016, through August 10, 2017, at 15 primary care practices in the US. Eligible participants had a scheduled primary care visit and were aged 20 to 70 years, had a body mass index between 27 and less than 40, and had a diagnosis of hypertension or type 2 diabetes. Follow-up ended on May 8, 2019. Interventions: Participants in the usual care group (n = 326) were mailed general information about weight management. Participants in the online program only group (n = 216) and the combined intervention group (n = 298) were registered for the online program. The participants in the combined intervention group also received weight-related population health management, which included additional support from nonclinical staff who monitored their progress in the online program and conducted periodic outreach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months based on measured weights recorded in the electronic health record. Weight change at 18 months was a secondary outcome. Results: Among the 840 participants who enrolled (mean age, 59.3 years [SD, 8.6 years]; 60% female; 76.8% White), 732 (87.1%) had a recorded weight at 12 months and the missing weights for the remaining participants were imputed. There was a significant difference in weight change at 12 months by group with a mean weight change of -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.1 to -0.3 kg) in the usual care group, -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.6 to -1.1 kg) in the online program only group, and -3.1 kg (95% CI, -3.7 to -2.5 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). The difference in weight change between the combined intervention group and the usual care group was -1.9 kg (97.5% CI, -2.9 to -0.9 kg; P < .001) and the difference between the combined intervention group and the online program only group was -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.2 to -0.3 kg; P = .01). At 18 months, the mean weight change was -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.8 to -1.0 kg) in the usual care group, -1.1 kg (95% CI, -2.0 to -0.3 kg) in the online program only group, and -2.8 kg (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.0 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among primary care patients with overweight or obesity and hypertension or type 2 diabetes, combining population health management with an online program resulted in a small but statistically significant greater weight loss at 12 months compared with usual care or the online program only. Further research is needed to understand the generalizability, scalability, and durability of these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02656693.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Online programs may help with weight loss but have not been widely implemented in routine primary care. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a combined intervention, including an online weight management program plus population health management, with the online program only and with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized trial with enrollment from July 19, 2016, through August 10, 2017, at 15 primary care practices in the US. Eligible participants had a scheduled primary care visit and were aged 20 to 70 years, had a body mass index between 27 and less than 40, and had a diagnosis of hypertension or type 2 diabetes. Follow-up ended on May 8, 2019. Interventions: Participants in the usual care group (n = 326) were mailed general information about weight management. Participants in the online program only group (n = 216) and the combined intervention group (n = 298) were registered for the online program. The participants in the combined intervention group also received weight-related population health management, which included additional support from nonclinical staff who monitored their progress in the online program and conducted periodic outreach. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months based on measured weights recorded in the electronic health record. Weight change at 18 months was a secondary outcome. Results: Among the 840 participants who enrolled (mean age, 59.3 years [SD, 8.6 years]; 60% female; 76.8% White), 732 (87.1%) had a recorded weight at 12 months and the missing weights for the remaining participants were imputed. There was a significant difference in weight change at 12 months by group with a mean weight change of -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.1 to -0.3 kg) in the usual care group, -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.6 to -1.1 kg) in the online program only group, and -3.1 kg (95% CI, -3.7 to -2.5 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). The difference in weight change between the combined intervention group and the usual care group was -1.9 kg (97.5% CI, -2.9 to -0.9 kg; P < .001) and the difference between the combined intervention group and the online program only group was -1.2 kg (95% CI, -2.2 to -0.3 kg; P = .01). At 18 months, the mean weight change was -1.9 kg (95% CI, -2.8 to -1.0 kg) in the usual care group, -1.1 kg (95% CI, -2.0 to -0.3 kg) in the online program only group, and -2.8 kg (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.0 kg) in the combined intervention group (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among primary care patients with overweight or obesity and hypertension or type 2 diabetes, combining population health management with an online program resulted in a small but statistically significant greater weight loss at 12 months compared with usual care or the online program only. Further research is needed to understand the generalizability, scalability, and durability of these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02656693.
Authors: Michael D Jensen; Donna H Ryan; Caroline M Apovian; Jamy D Ard; Anthony G Comuzzie; Karen A Donato; Frank B Hu; Van S Hubbard; John M Jakicic; Robert F Kushner; Catherine M Loria; Barbara E Millen; Cathy A Nonas; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; June Stevens; Victor J Stevens; Thomas A Wadden; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Harmon S Jordan; Karima A Kendall; Linda J Lux; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Laura C Morgan; Michael G Trisolini; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J E Ware; B Gandek; M Kosinski; N K Aaronson; G Apolone; J Brazier; M Bullinger; S Kaasa; A Leplège; L Prieto; M Sullivan; K Thunedborg Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Ronen Rozenblum; Barbara A De La Cruz; Nyryan V Nolido; Ihorma Adighibe; Kristina Secinaro; Katherine D McManus; Florencia Halperin; Jason P Block; David W Bates; Heather J Baer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David M Levine; Stella Savarimuthu; Allison Squires; Joseph Nicholson; Melanie Jay Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Heather J Baer; Barbara A De La Cruz; Ronen Rozenblum; Nyryan V Nolido; E John Orav; Kristina Metzler; Jason P Block; Florencia Halperin; Katherine D McManus; Louis J Aronne; Guadalupe Minero; David W Bates Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Jeanne M Clark; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Nae-Yuh Wang; Janelle W Coughlin; Gail Daumit; Edgar R Miller; Arlene Dalcin; Gerald J Jerome; Steven Geller; Gary Noronha; Thomas Pozefsky; Jeanne Charleston; Jeffrey B Reynolds; Nowella Durkin; Richard R Rubin; Thomas A Louis; Frederick L Brancati Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alline M Beleigoli; Andre Q Andrade; Alexandre G Cançado; Matheus Nl Paulo; Maria De Fátima H Diniz; Antonio L Ribeiro Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-01-08 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Margaret Raber; Yue Liao; Anne Rara; Susan M Schembre; Kate J Krause; Larkin Strong; Carrie Daniel-MacDougall; Karen Basen-Engquist Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Claire D Madigan; Henrietta E Graham; Elizabeth Sturgiss; Victoria E Kettle; Kajal Gokal; Greg Biddle; Gemma M J Taylor; Amanda J Daley Journal: BMJ Date: 2022-05-30
Authors: Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi; Renata Giacomini Occhiuto Ferreira Leite; Luísa Rocco Banzato; Vania Dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sumaiya Islam; Cordelia Elaiho; Guedy Arniella; Sheydgi Rivera; Nita Vangeepuram Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 4.614