Mary-Jane L Ma1,2, Sergey Yakovenko3,4, Haiqiang Zhang1,2, Suk Hang Cheng1,2, Valentina Apryshko3, Alex Zhavoronkov5, Peiyong Jiang1,2, K C Allen Chan1,2, Rossa W K Chiu1,2, Y M Dennis Lo1,2. 1. Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. 2. Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China. 3. Altravita IVF-clinic, ECO Center, Moscow, Russia. 4. Biophysics Department, Faculty of Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. 5. Insilico Medicine Ltd, Hong Kong Science and Technology Park, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Due to the maternally-inherited nature of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), there is a lack of information regarding fetal mtDNA in the plasma of pregnant women. We aim to explore the presence and topologic forms of circulating fetal and maternal mtDNA molecules in surrogate pregnancies. METHODS: Genotypic differences between fetal and surrogate maternal mtDNA were used to identify the fetal and maternal mtDNA molecules in plasma. Plasma samples were obtained from the surrogate pregnant mothers. Using cleavage-end signatures of BfaI restriction enzyme, linear and circular mtDNA molecules in maternal plasma could be differentiated. RESULTS: Fetal-derived mtDNA molecules were mainly linear (median: 88%; range: 80%-96%), whereas approximately half of the maternal-derived mtDNA molecules were circular (median: 51%; range: 42%-60%). The fetal DNA fraction of linear mtDNA was lower (median absolute difference: 9.8%; range: 1.1%-27%) than that of nuclear DNA (median: 20%; range: 9.7%-35%). The fetal-derived linear mtDNA molecules were shorter than the maternal-derived ones. CONCLUSION: Fetal mtDNA is present in maternal plasma, and consists mainly of linear molecules. Surrogate pregnancies represent a valuable clinical scenario for exploring the biology and potential clinical applications of circulating mtDNA, for example, for pregnancies conceived following mitochondrial replacement therapy.
OBJECTIVES: Due to the maternally-inherited nature of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), there is a lack of information regarding fetal mtDNA in the plasma of pregnant women. We aim to explore the presence and topologic forms of circulating fetal and maternal mtDNA molecules in surrogate pregnancies. METHODS: Genotypic differences between fetal and surrogate maternal mtDNA were used to identify the fetal and maternal mtDNA molecules in plasma. Plasma samples were obtained from the surrogate pregnant mothers. Using cleavage-end signatures of BfaI restriction enzyme, linear and circular mtDNA molecules in maternal plasma could be differentiated. RESULTS: Fetal-derived mtDNA molecules were mainly linear (median: 88%; range: 80%-96%), whereas approximately half of the maternal-derived mtDNA molecules were circular (median: 51%; range: 42%-60%). The fetal DNA fraction of linear mtDNA was lower (median absolute difference: 9.8%; range: 1.1%-27%) than that of nuclear DNA (median: 20%; range: 9.7%-35%). The fetal-derived linear mtDNA molecules were shorter than the maternal-derived ones. CONCLUSION: Fetal mtDNA is present in maternal plasma, and consists mainly of linear molecules. Surrogate pregnancies represent a valuable clinical scenario for exploring the biology and potential clinical applications of circulating mtDNA, for example, for pregnancies conceived following mitochondrial replacement therapy.
Authors: Peter Ulz; Gerhard G Thallinger; Martina Auer; Ricarda Graf; Karl Kashofer; Stephan W Jahn; Luca Abete; Gunda Pristauz; Edgar Petru; Jochen B Geigl; Ellen Heitzer; Michael R Speicher Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2016-08-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Laura E MacConaill; Robert T Burns; Anwesha Nag; Haley A Coleman; Michael K Slevin; Kristina Giorda; Madelyn Light; Kevin Lai; Mirna Jarosz; Matthew S McNeill; Matthew D Ducar; Matthew Meyerson; Aaron R Thorner Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Diana S C Han; Meng Ni; Rebecca W Y Chan; Vicken W H Chan; Kathy O Lui; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Stephen Cristiano; Alessandro Leal; Jillian Phallen; Jacob Fiksel; Vilmos Adleff; Daniel C Bruhm; Sarah Østrup Jensen; Jamie E Medina; Carolyn Hruban; James R White; Doreen N Palsgrove; Noushin Niknafs; Valsamo Anagnostou; Patrick Forde; Jarushka Naidoo; Kristen Marrone; Julie Brahmer; Brian D Woodward; Hatim Husain; Karlijn L van Rooijen; Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft; Anders Husted Madsen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Marcel Verheij; Annemieke Cats; Cornelis J A Punt; Geraldine R Vink; Nicole C T van Grieken; Miriam Koopman; Remond J A Fijneman; Julia S Johansen; Hans Jørgen Nielsen; Gerrit A Meijer; Claus Lindbjerg Andersen; Robert B Scharpf; Victor E Velculescu Journal: Nature Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kun Sun; Peiyong Jiang; Ada I C Wong; Yvonne K Y Cheng; Suk Hang Cheng; Haiqiang Zhang; K C Allen Chan; Tak Y Leung; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Roger Pique-Regi; Roberto Romero; Valeria Garcia-Flores; Azam Peyvandipour; Adi L Tarca; Errile Pusod; Jose Galaz; Derek Miller; Gaurav Bhatti; Robert Para; Tomi Kanninen; Ola Hadaya; Carmen Paredes; Kenichiro Motomura; Jeffrey R Johnson; Eunjung Jung; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Stanley M Berry; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2022-03-08