| Literature DB >> 33140329 |
Atsuko Hamada1, Eri Akagi1, Fumitaka Obayashi1, Sachiko Yamasaki1, Koichi Koizumi2, Manami Ohtaka3,4, Ken Nishimura5, Mahito Nakanishi3,4, Shigeaki Toratani2, Tetsuji Okamoto6.
Abstract
Noonan syndrome is an autosomal dominant developmental disorder. Although it is relatively common, and its phenotypical variability is well documented, its pathophysiology is not fully understood. Previously, with the aim of revealing the pathogenesis of genetic disorders, we reported the induction of cleidocranial dysplasia-specific human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) from patient's dental pulp cells (DPCs) under serum-free, feeder-free, and integration-free conditions. Notably, these cells showed potential for application to genetic disorder disease models. Furthermore, using similar procedures, we reported the induction of hiPSCs derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of healthy volunteers. These methods are beneficial, because they are carried out without invasive and painful biopsies. Using those procedures, we reprogrammed DPCs and PBMCs that were derived from a patient with Noonan syndrome (NS) to establish NS-specific hiPSCs (NS-DPC-hiPSCs and NS-PBMC-hiPSCs, respectively). The induction efficiency of NS-hiPSCs was higher than that of WT-hiPSCs. We hypothesize that this was caused by high NANOG expression. Here, we describe the experimental results and findings related to NS-hiPSCs. This is the first report on the establishment of NS-hiPSCs and their disease modeling.Entities:
Keywords: Disease modeling; Disease-specific human-induced pluripotent stem cells; Feeder-free; Integration-free; Noonan syndrome; Serum-free
Year: 2020 PMID: 33140329 PMCID: PMC7723931 DOI: 10.1007/s11626-020-00515-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim ISSN: 1071-2690 Impact factor: 2.416
Primers for Sanger sequence and RT-PCR
| Gene name | Primer sequence |
|---|---|
| KRAS | (F) 5′-ACACAAAACAGGCTCAGGACT-3′ |
| (R) 5′-AACAGTCTGrATGGAGCAGG-3′ | |
| Sox2 | (F) 5′-GGG AAA TGG GAG GGGTGCAAAAGAGG-3′ |
| (R) 5′-TIG CGT GAG TGT GGA TGG GAT TGG TG-3′ | |
| NANOG | (F) 5′-CAG CCC CGA TTC TTC CAC CAG TCC C-3′ |
| (R) 5′-CGG AAG ATICCC AGT CGG GTICAC C-3′ | |
| Oct3/4 | (F) 5′-GACAGG GGG AGG GGA GGAGCT AGG-3′ |
| (R) 5′-CTT CCCTCC AAC CAG TIG CCC CAAAC-3 | |
| Rex-1 | (F) 5′-CAG ATC CTAAACAGCTCG CAG AAT-3 |
| (R) 5′-GCG TAC GCA AAT TAA AGT CCA GA-3′ | |
| SeVdp NP | (F) 5′-AGA CCCTAA GAG GAC GAA GA-3′ |
| (R) 5′-ACT CCC ATG GCG TAA CTC CAT AGT G-3′ | |
| GAPDH | (F) 5′-TGA TGA CAT CAA GAA GGT GGT GAAG-31 |
| (R) 5′-TCC TIG GAG GCC ATG TGG GCCAT-3 |
RT-qPCR primers
| Gene name | Primer sequence | Universal ProbeLibrary probe |
|---|---|---|
| Sox2 | (F) 5′-GGG GGA ATG GAC CTT GTA TAG-3′ | #65 |
| (R) 5′-GCA AAG CTC CTA CCG TAC CA-3′ | ||
| NANOG | (F) 5′-ATG CCT CAC ACG GAG ACT GT-3′ | #69 |
| (R) 5′-GAG GGC TGT CCT GAA TAA GC-3′ | ||
| Oct3/4 | (F) 5′-CTT CGG AAG CCC TCA TTT C-3′ | #60 |
| (R) 5′-GAG AAG GCG AAA. TCC GAA G-3′ | ||
| GAPDH | (F) 5′-AGC CAC ATC GCT CAG ACA C-3′ | #60 |
| (R) 5′-GCC CAA TAC GAC CAA ATC C-3′ |
List of antibodies
| Antibody | Cat. no. | Antibody type | Dilution | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-Oct3/4 | MAB4401 | Mouse monoclonal | 1:200 | Millipore |
| Anti-SSEA4 | MC813-70 | Mouse monoclonal | 1:100 | Stemgent |
| Anti-Tra-1-60 | 09-0010 | Mouse monoclonal | 1:200 | Stemgent |
| Anti-β III tubulin | MAB3408/1/637 | Mouse monoclonal | 1:300 | Chemicon |
| Anti-α-SMA | NI584 | Mouse monoclonal | 1:1 | DAKO Cytomation |
| Anti-AFP | MAB1368 | Mouse monoclonal | 1:100 | R&D |
| Alexa Flour® 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG | A11001 | Goat polyclonal | 1:300 | Invitrogen |
Figure 1.Mutation analysis. The mutation CDS 456 A > T in KRAS was detected with MiSeq using a TruSight One Panel and was resequenced by Sanger sequencing.
Figure 2.High expression of NANOG in NS-PBMCs. The mRNA expression of OCT3/4, NANOG, and SOX2 in WT- and NS-PBMCs after 6-d cultivation. All data were normalized by GAPDH as internal control.
Figure 3.ALP-positive colonies and number of colonies. (A) Wells were stained with alkaline phosphate after 25-d culture. (B) The graph shows the induction efficiencies. The reprogramming efficiency of NS-PBMCs was significantly higher than that of WT-PBMCs. (C) The graph shows the colony size calculated by the following formula: ALP positive area/colony number; however, the observed difference in colony size was not significant.
Figure 4.Characterization of NS-PBMC-hiPSCs. (A) Gene expression of pluripotent markers by RT-PCR. Although OCT3/4 was detected before reprogramming, NANOG, SOX2, and REX1 were expressed after reprogramming. SeVdp was not detected under any conditions. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of pluripotent markers in NS-PBMC-hiPSC clone 13 (serum-free condition) at passage 20 (OCT, NANOG, TRA1-60, and SSEA4). Each bar indicates 100 μm in length. (C) Immunofluorescence staining of differentiation markers in NS-PBMC-hiPSCs clone 13 at passage 19 after 3 wk of differentiation in vivo (β-III tubulin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), and alpha fetoprotein (AFP)). Each bar indicates 100 μm in length. (D) Established NS-PBMC-hiPSCs differentiated into three germ layers in SCID mice. Each bar indicates 100 μm in length. (E) The karyotype was normal (2n = 44 + XX).