Literature DB >> 33139330

Measuring daily functioning in older persons using a frailty index: a cohort study based on routine primary care data.

Willeke M Ravensbergen1, Jeanet W Blom1, Andrea Wm Evers2, Mattijs E Numans1, Margot Wm de Waal1, Jacobijn Gussekloo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used for research; however, multicomponent outcome measures such as daily functioning cannot yet be readily extracted. AIM: To evaluate whether an electronic frailty index based on routine primary care data can be used as a measure for daily functioning in research with community-dwelling older persons (aged ≥75 years). DESIGN AND
SETTING: Cohort study among participants of the Integrated Systemic Care for Older People (ISCOPE) trial (11 476 eligible; 7285 in observational cohort; 3141 in trial; over-representation of frail people).
METHOD: At baseline (T0) and after 12 months (T12), daily functioning was measured with the Groningen Activities Restriction Scale (GARS, range 18-72). Electronic frailty index scores (range 0-1) at T0 and T12 were computed from the EHRs. The electronic frailty index (electronic Frailty Index - Utrecht) was tested for responsiveness and compared with the GARS as a gold standard for daily functioning.
RESULTS: In total, 1390 participants with complete EHR and follow-up data were selected (31.4% male; median age = 81 years, interquartile range = 78-85). The electronic frailty index increased with age, was higher for females, and lower for participants living with a partner. It was responsive after an acute major medical event; however, the correlation between the electronic frailty index and GARS at T0 and over time was limited.
CONCLUSION: Because the electronic frailty index does not reflect daily functioning, further research on new methods to measure daily functioning with routine care data (for example, other proxies) is needed before EHRs can be a useful data source for research with older persons. © British Journal of General Practice 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activities of daily living; aged; electronic health records; frail older persons; general practice

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33139330      PMCID: PMC7643824          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  33 in total

1.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.

Authors:  S KATZ; A B FORD; R W MOSKOWITZ; B A JACKSON; M W JAFFE
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1963-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care.

Authors:  Linda P Fried; Luigi Ferrucci; Jonathan Darer; Jeff D Williamson; Gerard Anderson
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 3.  What are frailty instruments for?

Authors:  Kenneth Rockwood; Olga Theou; Arnold Mitnitski
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 4.  Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: how are we measuring outcome?

Authors:  Lynn Hutchings; Rebecca Fox; Tim Chesser
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people.

Authors:  Kenneth Rockwood; Xiaowei Song; Chris MacKnight; Howard Bergman; David B Hogan; Ian McDowell; Arnold Mitnitski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Prediction of adverse health outcomes in older people using a frailty index based on routine primary care data.

Authors:  Irene Drubbel; Niek J de Wit; Nienke Bleijenberg; René J C Eijkemans; Marieke J Schuurmans; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 6.053

7.  Identifying frailty: do the Frailty Index and Groningen Frailty Indicator cover different clinical perspectives? a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Irene Drubbel; Nienke Bleijenberg; Guido Kranenburg; René J C Eijkemans; Marieke J Schuurmans; Niek J de Wit; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  A standard procedure for creating a frailty index.

Authors:  Samuel D Searle; Arnold Mitnitski; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Thomas M Gill; Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Assessment of outcome after hip fracture: development of a universal assessment system for hip fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Bowers; Martyn J Parker
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-06-03

10.  Outcome assessment after hip fracture: is EQ-5D the answer?

Authors:  N Parsons; X L Griffin; J Achten; M L Costa
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Frail Patients by Using Electronic Health Records in Primary Care: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jianzhao Luo; Xiaoyang Liao; Chuan Zou; Qian Zhao; Yi Yao; Xiang Fang; John Spicer
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.