Literature DB >> 33139328

Structural comparisons of host and African swine fever virus dUTPases reveal new clues for inhibitor development.

Rui Liang1, Gang Wang1, Ding Zhang1, Gang Ye1, Mengxia Li1, Yuejun Shi2, Jiale Shi1, Huanchun Chen1, Guiqing Peng3.   

Abstract

African swine fever, caused by the African swine fever virus (ASFV), is among the most significant swine diseases. There are currently no effective treatments against ASFV. ASFV contains a gene encoding a dUTPase (E165R), which is required for viral replication in swine macrophages, making it an attractive target for inhibitor development. However, the full structural details of the ASFV dUTPase and those of the comparable swine enzyme are not available, limiting further insights. Herein, we determine the crystal structures of ASFV dUTPase and swine dUTPase in both their ligand-free and ligand-bound forms. We observe that the swine enzyme employs a classical dUTPase architecture made up of three-subunit active sites, whereas the ASFV enzyme employs a novel two-subunit active site. We then performed a comparative analysis of all dUTPase structures uploaded in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), which showed classical and non-classical types were mainly determined by the C-terminal β-strand orientation, and the difference was mainly related to the four amino acids behind motif IV. Thus, our study not only explains the reason for the structural diversity of dUTPase but also reveals how to predict dUTPase type, which may have implications for the dUTPase family. Finally, we tested two dUTPase inhibitors developed for the Plasmodium falciparum dUTPase against the swine and ASFV enzymes. One of these compounds inhibited the ASFV dUTPase at low micromolar concentrations (Kd = 15.6 μM) and with some selectivity (∼2x) over swine dUTPase. In conclusion, our study expands our understanding of the dUTPase family and may aid in the development of specific ASFV inhibitors.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASFV; dUTPase; inhibitor design; swine; variable conformations

Year:  2020        PMID: 33139328      PMCID: PMC7948977          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  4 in total

Review 1.  Structures and Functional Diversities of ASFV Proteins.

Authors:  Guoguo Wang; Mengjia Xie; Wei Wu; Zhongzhou Chen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.048

2.  Identification and Characterization of a Novel Epitope of ASFV-Encoded dUTPase by Monoclonal Antibodies.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Rui Wang; Xiaojing Zhu; Jiaxin Jin; Wenlong Lu; Xuyang Zhao; Bo Wan; Yifei Liao; Qin Zhao; Christopher L Netherton; Guoqing Zhuang; Aijun Sun; Gaiping Zhang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 3.  Viral dUTPases: Modulators of Innate Immunity.

Authors:  Maria Eugenia Ariza; Brandon Cox; Britney Martinez; Irene Mena-Palomo; Gloria Jeronimo Zarate; Marshall Vance Williams
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Deletion of the ASFV dUTPase Gene E165R from the Genome of Highly Virulent African Swine Fever Virus Georgia 2010 Does Not Affect Virus Replication or Virulence in Domestic Pigs.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Vuono; Elizabeth Ramirez-Medina; Sarah Pruitt; Ayushi Rai; Nallely Espinoza; Ediane Silva; Lauro Velazquez-Salinas; Douglas P Gladue; Manuel V Borca
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.818

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.